Literature DB >> 21753039

Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories.

Paolo Domenici1, Jonathan M Blagburn, Jonathan P Bacon.   

Abstract

Escape responses are used by many animal species as their main defence against predator attacks. Escape success is determined by a number of variables; important are the directionality (the percentage of responses directed away from the threat) and the escape trajectories (ETs) measured relative to the threat. Although logic would suggest that animals should always turn away from a predator, work on various species shows that these away responses occur only approximately 50-90% of the time. A small proportion of towards responses may introduce some unpredictability and may be an adaptive feature of the escape system. Similar issues apply to ETs. Theoretically, an optimal ET can be modelled on the geometry of predator-prey encounters. However, unpredictability (and hence high variability) in trajectories may be necessary for preventing predators from learning a simple escape pattern. This review discusses the emerging trends in escape trajectories, as well as the modulating key factors, such as the surroundings and body design. The main ET patterns identified are: (1) high ET variability within a limited angular sector (mainly 90-180 deg away from the threat; this variability is in some cases based on multiple peaks of ETs), (2) ETs that allow sensory tracking of the threat and (3) ETs towards a shelter. These characteristic features are observed across various taxa and, therefore, their expression may be mainly related to taxon-independent animal design features and to the environmental context in which prey live - for example whether the immediate surroundings of the prey provide potential refuges.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753039      PMCID: PMC4495464          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.029652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  41 in total

1.  [Laterality of the initial stage of escape response in roach (Rutilus rutilus) upon impact of alternating electric current].

Authors:  E I Izvekov; V A Nepomniashchikh
Journal:  Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

2.  Protean defence by prey animals.

Authors:  D A Humphries; P M Driver
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Lateralization of trunk muscle volume, and lateralization of swimming turns of fish responding to external stimuli.

Authors:  B A Heuts
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start.

Authors:  Saskia Wöhl; Stefan Schuster
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Behavioral analyses of wind-evoked escape of the cricket, Gryllodes sigillatus.

Authors:  Masamichi Kanou; Atsuko Konishi; Rie Suenaga
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.931

6.  The wind-evoked escape behavior of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: integration of behavioral elements

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Phase encoding in the Mauthner system: implications in left-right sound source discrimination.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Thomas Preuss; Donald S Faber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Preparing for escape: anti-predator posture and fast-start performance in gobies.

Authors:  Håkan Turesson; Andrea Satta; Paolo Domenici
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Visually mediated motor planning in the escape response of Drosophila.

Authors:  Gwyneth Card; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  How stimulus direction determines the trajectory of the Mauthner-initiated escape response in a teleost fish.

Authors:  R C Eaton; D S Emberley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  37 in total

1.  Prey should hide more randomly when a predator attacks more persistently.

Authors:  Shmuel Gal; Steve Alpern; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Fish prey change strategy with the direction of a threat.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Kelsey Changsing; William J Stewart; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The effects of steady swimming on fish escape performance.

Authors:  Sanam B Anwar; Kelsey Cathcart; Karin Darakananda; Ashley N Gaing; Seo Yim Shin; Xena Vronay; Dania N Wright; David J Ellerby
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  The decision to move: response times, neuronal circuits and sensory memory in a simple vertebrate.

Authors:  Alan Roberts; Roman Borisyuk; Edgar Buhl; Andrea Ferrario; Stella Koutsikou; Wen-Chang Li; Stephen R Soffe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Predator-induced flow disturbances alert prey, from the onset of an attack.

Authors:  Jérôme Casas; Thomas Steinmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Parental effects improve escape performance of juvenile reef fish in a high-CO2 world.

Authors:  Bridie J M Allan; Gabrielle M Miller; Mark I McCormick; Paolo Domenici; Philip L Munday
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Escape trajectories are deflected when fish larvae intercept their own C-start wake.

Authors:  Gen Li; Ulrike K Müller; Johan L van Leeuwen; Hao Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  When Optimal Strategy Matters to Prey Fish.

Authors:  Alberto Soto; William J Stewart; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.326

10.  Visual Threat Assessment and Reticulospinal Encoding of Calibrated Responses in Larval Zebrafish.

Authors:  Kiran Bhattacharyya; David L McLean; Malcolm A MacIver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.