Literature DB >> 25030982

The evolution of peafowl and other taxa with ocelli (eyespots): a phylogenomic approach.

Keping Sun1, Kelly A Meiklejohn2, Brant C Faircloth3, Travis C Glenn4, Edward L Braun2, Rebecca T Kimball5.   

Abstract

The most striking feature of peafowl (Pavo) is the males' elaborate train, which exhibits ocelli (ornamental eyespots) that are under sexual selection. Two additional genera within the Phasianidae (Polyplectron and Argusianus) exhibit ocelli, but the appearance and location of these ornamental eyespots exhibit substantial variation among these genera, raising the question of whether ocelli are homologous. Within Polyplectron, ocelli are ancestral, suggesting ocelli may have evolved even earlier, prior to the divergence among genera. However, it remains unclear whether Pavo, Polyplectron and Argusianus form a monophyletic clade in which ocelli evolved once. We estimated the phylogeny of the ocellated species using sequences from 1966 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and three mitochondrial regions. The three ocellated genera did form a strongly supported clade, but each ocellated genus was sister to at least one genus without ocelli. Indeed, Polyplectron and Galloperdix, a genus not previously suggested to be related to any ocellated taxon, were sister genera. The close relationship between taxa with and without ocelli suggests multiple gains or losses. Independent gains, possibly reflecting a pre-existing bias for eye-like structures among females and/or the existence of a simple mutational pathway for the origin of ocelli, appears to be the most likely explanation.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  eyespots; homology; ocelli; sexual selection; ultraconserved elements

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030982      PMCID: PMC4123699          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Comparative molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of 3'-UTRs and introns in Galliformes.

Authors:  Amber J Bonilla; Edward L Braun; Rebecca T Kimball
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Fast and consistent estimation of species trees using supermatrix rooted triples.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; James H Degnan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic.

Authors:  R T Kimball; E L Braun; P W Zwartjes; T M Crowe; J D Ligon
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis.

Authors:  Rami A Dalloul; Julie A Long; Aleksey V Zimin; Luqman Aslam; Kathryn Beal; Le Ann Blomberg; Pascal Bouffard; David W Burt; Oswald Crasta; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Kristal Cooper; Roger A Coulombe; Supriyo De; Mary E Delany; Jerry B Dodgson; Jennifer J Dong; Clive Evans; Karin M Frederickson; Paul Flicek; Liliana Florea; Otto Folkerts; Martien A M Groenen; Tim T Harkins; Javier Herrero; Steve Hoffmann; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Andrew Jiang; Pieter de Jong; Pete Kaiser; Heebal Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Sungwon Kim; David Langenberger; Mi-Kyung Lee; Taeheon Lee; Shrinivasrao Mane; Guillaume Marcais; Manja Marz; Audrey P McElroy; Thero Modise; Mikhail Nefedov; Cédric Notredame; Ian R Paton; William S Payne; Geo Pertea; Dennis Prickett; Daniela Puiu; Dan Qioa; Emanuele Raineri; Magali Ruffier; Steven L Salzberg; Michael C Schatz; Chantel Scheuring; Carl J Schmidt; Steven Schroeder; Stephen M J Searle; Edward J Smith; Jacqueline Smith; Tad S Sonstegard; Peter F Stadler; Hakim Tafer; Zhijian Jake Tu; Curtis P Van Tassell; Albert J Vilella; Kelly P Williams; James A Yorke; Liqing Zhang; Hong-Bin Zhang; Xiaojun Zhang; Yang Zhang; Kent M Reed
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A phylogeny of birds based on over 1,500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  John E McCormack; Michael G Harvey; Brant C Faircloth; Nicholas G Crawford; Travis C Glenn; Robb T Brumfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genome-wide ultraconserved elements exhibit higher phylogenetic informativeness than traditional gene markers in percomorph fishes.

Authors:  Princess S Gilbert; Jonathan Chang; Calvin Pan; Eric M Sobel; Janet S Sinsheimer; Brant C Faircloth; Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Conserved Nonexonic Elements: A Novel Class of Marker for Phylogenomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; Alison Cloutier; Allan J Baker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  A method for identification of highly conserved elements and evolutionary analysis of superphylum Alveolata.

Authors:  Lev I Rubanov; Alexandr V Seliverstov; Oleg A Zverkov; Vassily A Lyubetsky
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Ice ages and butterflyfishes: Phylogenomics elucidates the ecological and evolutionary history of reef fishes in an endemism hotspot.

Authors:  Joseph D DiBattista; Michael E Alfaro; Laurie Sorenson; John H Choat; Jean-Paul A Hobbs; Tane H Sinclair-Taylor; Luiz A Rocha; Jonathan Chang; Osmar J Luiz; Peter F Cowman; Matt Friedman; Michael L Berumen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Ultraconserved element (UCE) probe set design: Base genome and initial design parameters critical for optimization.

Authors:  Grey T Gustafson; Alana Alexander; John S Sproul; James M Pflug; David R Maddison; Andrew E Z Short
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Museomics and phylogenomics with protein-encoding ultraconserved elements illuminate the evolution of life history and phallic morphology of flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  Eliana Buenaventura
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-28

7.  Divergence time estimation of Galliformes based on the best gene shopping scheme of ultraconserved elements.

Authors:  Peter A Hosner; Donna L Dittmann; John P O'Neill; Sharon M Birks; Edward L Braun; Rebecca T Kimball
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-22

8.  Genome Sequence of Peacock Reveals the Peculiar Case of a Glittering Bird.

Authors:  Shubham K Jaiswal; Ankit Gupta; Rituja Saxena; Vishnu P K Prasoodanan; Ashok K Sharma; Parul Mittal; Ankita Roy; Aaron B A Shafer; Nagarjun Vijay; Vineet K Sharma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.