Literature DB >> 26079130

Genome-wide ultraconserved elements exhibit higher phylogenetic informativeness than traditional gene markers in percomorph fishes.

Princess S Gilbert1, Jonathan Chang2, Calvin Pan3, Eric M Sobel4, Janet S Sinsheimer5, Brant C Faircloth6, Michael E Alfaro7.   

Abstract

Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) have become popular markers in phylogenomic studies because of their cost effectiveness and their potential to resolve problematic phylogenetic relationships. Although UCE datasets typically contain a much larger number of loci and sites than more traditional datasets of PCR-amplified, single-copy, protein coding genes, a fraction of UCE sites are expected to be part of a nearly invariant core, and the relative performance of UCE datasets versus protein coding gene datasets is poorly understood. Here we use phylogenetic informativeness (PI) to compare the resolving power of multi-locus and UCE datasets in a sample of percomorph fishes with sequenced genomes (genome-enabled). We compare three data sets: UCE core regions, flanking sequence adjacent to the UCE core and a set of ten protein coding genes commonly used in fish systematics. We found the net informativeness of UCE core and flank regions to be roughly ten-fold and 100-fold more informative than that of the protein coding genes. On a per locus basis UCEs and protein coding genes exhibited similar levels of phylogenetic informativeness. Our results suggest that UCEs offer enormous potential for resolving relationships across the percomorph tree of life.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molecular evolution; Next-generation sequencing; Non-coding DNA; Phylogenetic informativeness; Phylogenomics; Ultraconserved elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26079130      PMCID: PMC4583375          DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  41 in total

1.  Optimal data partitioning and a test case for ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on ten nuclear loci.

Authors:  Chenhong Li; Guoqing Lu; Guillermo Ortí
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs.

Authors:  Nicholas G Crawford; Brant C Faircloth; John E McCormack; Robb T Brumfield; Kevin Winker; Travis C Glenn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Transposon-free regions in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Cas Simons; Michael Pheasant; Igor V Makunin; John S Mattick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Mammalian ultraconserved elements are strongly depleted among segmental duplications and copy number variants.

Authors:  Adnan Derti; Frederick P Roth; George M Church; C-ting Wu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-09-24       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  28-way vertebrate alignment and conservation track in the UCSC Genome Browser.

Authors:  Webb Miller; Kate Rosenbloom; Ross C Hardison; Minmei Hou; James Taylor; Brian Raney; Richard Burhans; David C King; Robert Baertsch; Daniel Blankenberg; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Anton Nekrutenko; Belinda Giardine; Robert S Harris; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Mark Diekhans; Thomas H Pringle; William J Murphy; Arthur Lesk; George M Weinstock; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Richard A Gibbs; Eric S Lander; Adam Siepel; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Phylogenetic informativeness reconciles ray-finned fish molecular divergence times.

Authors:  Alex Dornburg; Jeffrey P Townsend; Matt Friedman; Thomas J Near
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  A Phylogenomic Perspective on the Radiation of Ray-Finned Fishes Based upon Targeted Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs).

Authors:  Brant C Faircloth; Laurie Sorenson; Francesco Santini; Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  PhyDesign: an online application for profiling phylogenetic informativeness.

Authors:  Francesc López-Giráldez; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Target enrichment of ultraconserved elements from arthropods provides a genomic perspective on relationships among Hymenoptera.

Authors:  Brant C Faircloth; Michael G Branstetter; Noor D White; Seán G Brady
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.090

View more
  15 in total

1.  Phylogenomics indicates Amazonia as the major source of Neotropical swarm-founding social wasp diversity.

Authors:  Rodolpho S T Menezes; Michael W Lloyd; Seán G Brady
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Prolonged morphological expansion of spiny-rayed fishes following the end-Cretaceous.

Authors:  Ava Ghezelayagh; Richard C Harrington; Edward D Burress; Matthew A Campbell; Janet C Buckner; Prosanta Chakrabarty; Jessica R Glass; W Tyler McCraney; Peter J Unmack; Christine E Thacker; Michael E Alfaro; Sarah T Friedman; William B Ludt; Peter F Cowman; Matt Friedman; Samantha A Price; Alex Dornburg; Brant C Faircloth; Peter C Wainwright; Thomas J Near
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 3.  Perfect and imperfect views of ultraconserved sequences.

Authors:  Valentina Snetkova; Len A Pennacchio; Axel Visel; Diane E Dickel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 59.581

4.  Confronting Sources of Systematic Error to Resolve Historically Contentious Relationships: A Case Study Using Gadiform Fishes (Teleostei, Paracanthopterygii, Gadiformes).

Authors:  Adela Roa-Varón; Rebecca B Dikow; Giorgio Carnevale; Luke Tornabene; Carole C Baldwin; Chenhong Li; Eric J Hilton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Phylogenomic analysis of carangimorph fishes reveals flatfish asymmetry arose in a blink of the evolutionary eye.

Authors:  Richard C Harrington; Brant C Faircloth; Ron I Eytan; W Leo Smith; Thomas J Near; Michael E Alfaro; Matt Friedman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  PhyInformR: phylogenetic experimental design and phylogenomic data exploration in R.

Authors:  Alex Dornburg; J Nick Fisk; Jules Tamagnan; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Early-branching euteleost relationships: areas of congruence between concatenation and coalescent model inferences.

Authors:  Matthew A Campbell; Michael E Alfaro; Max Belasco; J Andrés López
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Phylogenomic methods outperform traditional multi-locus approaches in resolving deep evolutionary history: a case study of formicine ants.

Authors:  Bonnie B Blaimer; Seán G Brady; Ted R Schultz; Michael W Lloyd; Brian L Fisher; Philip S Ward
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Genomic Mining of Phylogenetically Informative Nuclear Markers in Bark and Ambrosia Beetles.

Authors:  Dario Pistone; Sigrid Mugu; Bjarte Henry Jordal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) resolve the phylogeny of Australasian smurf-weevils.

Authors:  Matthew H Van Dam; Athena W Lam; Katayo Sagata; Bradley Gewa; Raymond Laufa; Michael Balke; Brant C Faircloth; Alexander Riedel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.