OBJECTIVES: To intra-individually compare single-portal-phase low-tube-voltage (100-kVp) computed tomography (CT) with 120-kVp images for short-term follow-up assessment of CT severity index (CTSI) of acute pancreatitis, interobserver agreement and radiation dose. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 66 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent initial dual-contrast-phase CT (unenhanced, arterial, portal phase) at admission and short-term (mean interval 11.4 days) follow-up dual-contrast-phase dual-energy CT. The 100-kVp and linearly blended images representing 120-kVp acquisition follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by three radiologists using a modified CTSI assessing pancreatic inflammation, necrosis and extrapancreatic complications. Scores were compared with paired t test and interobserver agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Mean CTSI scores on unenhanced, portal- and dual-contrast-phase images were 4.9, 6.1 and 6.2 (120 kVp) and 5.0, 6.0 and 6.1 (100 kVp), respectively. Contrast-enhanced series showed a higher CTSI compared to unenhanced images (P < 0.05) but no significant differences between single- and dual-contrast-phase series (P > 0.7). CTSI scores were comparable for 100-kVp and 120-kVp images (P > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was substantial for all evaluated series and subcategories (ICC 0.67-0.93). DLP of single-portal-phase 100-kVp images was reduced by 41 % compared to 120-kVp images (363.8 versus 615.9 mGy cm). CONCLUSIONS: Low-tube-voltage single-phase 100-kVp CT provides sufficient information for follow-up evaluation of acute pancreatitis and significantly reduces radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • Single-portal-phase CT provides sufficient evaluation for follow-up of acute pancreatitis. • Follow-up CT does not benefit from unenhanced or arterial-phase acquisition. • CT severity index scores are equal for dual-contrast-phase 100-/120-kVp acquisition (P > 0.05). • 100-kVp single-portal-phase follow-up CT of acute pancreatitis significantly reduces radiation exposure.
OBJECTIVES: To intra-individually compare single-portal-phase low-tube-voltage (100-kVp) computed tomography (CT) with 120-kVp images for short-term follow-up assessment of CT severity index (CTSI) of acute pancreatitis, interobserver agreement and radiation dose. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 66 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent initial dual-contrast-phase CT (unenhanced, arterial, portal phase) at admission and short-term (mean interval 11.4 days) follow-up dual-contrast-phase dual-energy CT. The 100-kVp and linearly blended images representing 120-kVp acquisition follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by three radiologists using a modified CTSI assessing pancreatic inflammation, necrosis and extrapancreatic complications. Scores were compared with paired t test and interobserver agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Mean CTSI scores on unenhanced, portal- and dual-contrast-phase images were 4.9, 6.1 and 6.2 (120 kVp) and 5.0, 6.0 and 6.1 (100 kVp), respectively. Contrast-enhanced series showed a higher CTSI compared to unenhanced images (P < 0.05) but no significant differences between single- and dual-contrast-phase series (P > 0.7). CTSI scores were comparable for 100-kVp and 120-kVp images (P > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was substantial for all evaluated series and subcategories (ICC 0.67-0.93). DLP of single-portal-phase 100-kVp images was reduced by 41 % compared to 120-kVp images (363.8 versus 615.9 mGy cm). CONCLUSIONS: Low-tube-voltage single-phase 100-kVp CT provides sufficient information for follow-up evaluation of acute pancreatitis and significantly reduces radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • Single-portal-phase CT provides sufficient evaluation for follow-up of acute pancreatitis. • Follow-up CT does not benefit from unenhanced or arterial-phase acquisition. • CT severity index scores are equal for dual-contrast-phase 100-/120-kVp acquisition (P > 0.05). • 100-kVp single-portal-phase follow-up CT of acute pancreatitis significantly reduces radiation exposure.
Authors: Sascha Kaufmann; Alexander Sauter; Daniel Spira; Sergios Gatidis; Dominik Ketelsen; Martin Heuschmid; Claus D Claussen; Christoph Thomas Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Huiman Barnhart; Sebastian T Schindera; Lisa M Ho; Tracy A Jaffe; Terry T Yoshizumi; Richard Youngblood; Ehsan Samei Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Koenraad J Mortele; Walter Wiesner; Lisa Intriere; Shridhar Shankar; Kelly H Zou; Babek N Kalantari; Alex Perez; Eric vanSonnenberg; Pablo R Ros; Peter A Banks; Stuart G Silverman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Anna Darnell; Napoleón Macías; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Sonia Rodríguez; Jordi Rimola; Mario Pagés; Ángeles García-Criado; Marco Rengo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Laghi; Carmen Ayuso Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Simon S Martin; Franziska Trapp; Julian L Wichmann; Moritz H Albrecht; Lukas Lenga; James Durden; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Tommaso D'Angelo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Kristina Hüsers; Martin Beeres; Andreas M Bucher; Moritz Kaup; Simon S Martin; Sebastian Fischer; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 5.315