BACKGROUND: Medical examination is the main source of artificial radiation exposure. Because children present an increased sensitivity to ionising radiation, radiology practices at a national level in paediatrics should be monitored. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the ionising radiation exposure from diagnostic medical examinations of the French paediatric population in 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on frequency of examinations were provided by the French National Health Insurance through a representative sample including 107,627 children ages 0-15 years. Effective doses for each type of procedure were obtained from the published French literature. Median and mean effective doses were calculated for the studied population. RESULTS: About a third of the children were exposed to at least one examination using ionising radiation in 2010. Conventional radiology, dental exams, CT scans and nuclear medicine and interventional radiology represent respectively 55.3%, 42.3%, 2.1% and 0.3% of the procedures. Children 10-15 years old and babies from birth to 1 year are the most exposed populations, with respectively 1,098 and 734 examinations per 1,000 children per year. Before 1 year of age, chest and pelvis radiographs are the most common imaging tests, 54% and 32%, respectively. Only 1% of the studied population is exposed to CT scan, with 62% of these children exposed to a head-and-neck procedure. The annual median and mean effective doses were respectively 0.03 mSv and 0.7 mSv for the exposed children. CONCLUSION: This study gives updated reference data on French paediatric exposure to medical ionising radiation that can be used for public health or epidemiological purposes. Paediatric diagnostic use appears much lower than that of the whole French population as estimated in a previous study.
BACKGROUND: Medical examination is the main source of artificial radiation exposure. Because children present an increased sensitivity to ionising radiation, radiology practices at a national level in paediatrics should be monitored. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the ionising radiation exposure from diagnostic medical examinations of the French paediatric population in 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on frequency of examinations were provided by the French National Health Insurance through a representative sample including 107,627 children ages 0-15 years. Effective doses for each type of procedure were obtained from the published French literature. Median and mean effective doses were calculated for the studied population. RESULTS: About a third of the children were exposed to at least one examination using ionising radiation in 2010. Conventional radiology, dental exams, CT scans and nuclear medicine and interventional radiology represent respectively 55.3%, 42.3%, 2.1% and 0.3% of the procedures. Children 10-15 years old and babies from birth to 1 year are the most exposed populations, with respectively 1,098 and 734 examinations per 1,000 children per year. Before 1 year of age, chest and pelvis radiographs are the most common imaging tests, 54% and 32%, respectively. Only 1% of the studied population is exposed to CT scan, with 62% of these children exposed to a head-and-neck procedure. The annual median and mean effective doses were respectively 0.03 mSv and 0.7 mSv for the exposed children. CONCLUSION: This study gives updated reference data on French paediatric exposure to medical ionising radiation that can be used for public health or epidemiological purposes. Paediatric diagnostic use appears much lower than that of the whole French population as estimated in a previous study.
Authors: M-O Bernier; J-L Rehel; H J Brisse; X Wu-Zhou; S Caer-Lorho; S Jacob; J F Chateil; B Aubert; D Laurier Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Francis R Verdun; Daniel Gutierrez; John Paul Vader; Abbas Aroua; Leonor Trinidad Alamo-Maestre; François Bochud; François Gudinchet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Andrew Williams; Robert T Greenlee; Sheila Weinmann; Leif I Solberg; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Douglas Roblin; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas Vanneman; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-21
Authors: Andrea Pola; Daniela Corbella; Andrea Righini; Alberto Torresin; Paola E Colombo; Luigi Vismara; Luca Trombetta; Michele Maddalo; Maria Vittoria Introini; Daniela Tinelli; Laura Strohmenger; Giovanna Garattini; Angelica Munari; Fabio Triulzi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mark Inman; Anthony Otley; Trevor Dummer; Yunsong Cui; Matthias H Schmidt; Louise Parker Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: N Journy; J-L Rehel; H Ducou Le Pointe; C Lee; H Brisse; J-F Chateil; S Caer-Lorho; D Laurier; M-O Bernier Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 7.640