| Literature DB >> 25028944 |
Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas, Alexandre Marini Isola, Augusto Manoel de Carvalho Farias, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Ana Maria Casati Gama, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Duarte, Arthur Vianna, Ary Serpa Neto, Bruno de Arruda Bravim, Bruno do Valle Pinheiro, Bruno Franco Mazza, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho, Carlos Toufen Júnior, Cid Marcos Nascimento David, Corine Taniguchi, Débora Dutra da Silveira Mazza, Desanka Dragosavac, Diogo Oliveira Toledo, Eduardo Leite Costa, Eliana Bernardete Caser, Eliezer Silva, Fabio Ferreira Amorim, Felipe Saddy, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas, Gisele Sampaio Silva, Gustavo Faissol Janot de Matos, João Claudio Emmerich, Jorge Luis Dos Santos Valiatti, José Mario Meira Teles, Josué Almeida Victorino, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Luciana Passuello do Vale Prodomo, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Luiz Cláudio Martins, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas, Marco Antonio Soares Reis, Marcelo Brito Passos Amato, Marcelo Alcântara Holanda, Marcelo Park, Marcia Jacomelli, Marcos Tavares, Marta Cristina Paulette Damasceno, Murillo Santucci César Assunção, Moyzes Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno, Nazah Cherif Mohamad Youssef, Paulo José Zimmermann Teixeira, Pedro Caruso, Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte, Octavio Messeder, Raquel Caserta Eid, Ricardo Goulart Rodrigues, Rodrigo Francisco de Jesus, Ronaldo Adib Kairalla, Sandra Justino, Sérgio Nogueira Nemer, Simone Barbosa Romero, Verônica Moreira Amado.
Abstract
Perspectives on invasive and noninvasive ventilatory support for critically ill patients are evolving, as much evidence indicates that ventilation may have positive effects on patient survival and the quality of the care provided in intensive care units in Brazil. For those reasons, the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine (Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB) and the Brazilian Thoracic Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumonia e Tisiologia - SBPT), represented by the Mechanical Ventilation Committee and the Commission of Intensive Therapy, respectively, decided to review the literature and draft recommendations for mechanical ventilation with the goal of creating a document for bedside guidance as to the best practices on mechanical ventilation available to their members. The document was based on the available evidence regarding 29 subtopics selected as the most relevant for the subject of interest. The project was developed in several stages, during which the selected topics were distributed among experts recommended by both societies with recent publications on the subject of interest and/or significant teaching and research activity in the field of mechanical ventilation in Brazil. The experts were divided into pairs that were charged with performing a thorough review of the international literature on each topic. All the experts met at the Forum on Mechanical Ventilation, which was held at the headquarters of AMIB in São Paulo on August 3 and 4, 2013, to collaboratively draft the final text corresponding to each sub-topic, which was presented to, appraised, discussed and approved in a plenary session that included all 58 participants and aimed to create the final document.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25028944 PMCID: PMC4103936 DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva ISSN: 0103-507X
Contraindications to noninvasive ventilation
| Absolute |
| Need for emergency intubation |
| Cardiac or respiratory arrest |
| Relative |
| Inability to cooperate, protect the airways, or abundant secretions |
| Reduced level of consciousness (excepting hypercapnic acidosis in COPD) |
| Non-respiratory organ failure (encephalopathy, malignant arrhythmia, severe gastrointestinal bleeding with hemodynamic instability) |
| Face or neurological surgery |
| Face trauma or deformity |
| High risk of aspiration |
| Upper airway obstruction |
| Recent esophageal anastomosis (avoid pressurization above 15cmH2O) |
COPD - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Patients considered to be at risk of extubation failure and who could benefit from noninvasive ventilation immediately after extubation (prophylactic use)
| Hypercapnia |
| Congestive heart failure |
| Ineffective cough or secretions retained in the airways |
| More than one failure in the spontaneous respiration test |
| More than one comorbidity |
| Upper airway obstruction |
| Age >65 years old |
| Increase of severity of illness, as indicated by APACHE >12 on the day of extubation |
| Duration of mechanical ventilation >72 hours |
| Patients with neuromuscular diseases |
| Obese patients |
Types of modes of ventilation for noninvasive support
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CPAP | Constant airway pressure | Recommendation: in cardiogenic APE, PO of abdominal surgery, andmild/moderate sleep apnea |
| Spontaneous ventilation | ||
| BIPAP (BILEVEL) | Two pressure levels (IPAP and EPAP) | Recommendation: in acute hypercapnia, for respiratory muscle rest; in cardiogenic APE; and in immunosuppressed individuals with infection |
| Flow cycled |
CPAP - continuous positive airway pressure; BIPAP - bilevel positive airway pressure; APE - acute pulmonary edema; PO - postoperative period; IPAP - inspiratory positive airway pressure; EPAP - expiratory positive airway pressure.
except when contraindicated.
Differences between noninvasive ventilation using portable ventilators specific for noninvasive ventilation and intensive care unit microprocessor-controlled ventilators with a non-invasive ventilation module
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Exhalation | Exhalation valve | Exhalation through port or exhalation valve in the mask or circuit |
| Air leak | Compensated when PCV (time-cycled) or NIV-specific module is used | Automatic compensation |
| O2 supplementation | Regulated by the ventilator blender | Regulated by the ventilator blender or O2 supplementation through the mask and/or circuit |
| PEEP | In the ventilator exhalation valve | Ventilator exhalation valve and/or adjustable valve in mask |
| Type of interface | Interfaces for dual-limb circuit | Allows for use of masks with built-in exhalation valve or in the ventilator circuit |
ICU - intensive care unit; PCV - pressure-controlled ventilation; NIV - noninvasive ventilation; O2 - oxygen; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.
Advantages and disadvantages of the various types of interfaces
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal | Less risk of aspiration | Mouth air leak | Continuous-flow single-limb circuit devices |
| Facilitates expectoration | Depressurization through the mouth | ||
| Less claustrophobia | Nose irritation | ||
| Allows talking | Limited use in patients with nasal obstruction | ||
| Allows eating | Mouth dryness | ||
| Easy handling | |||
| Less dead space | |||
| Facial | Less mouth air leak | Higher risk of pressure ulcer on the nose or support points | Continuous-flow or demand-flow devices |
| More appropriate for acute conditions because it allows for greater flow rates and pressure levels | Greater claustrophobia | Single- or dual-limb circuit | |
| Greater risk of aspiration | When dual-limb circuit devices are used, leak automatic compensation in the circuit is necessary | ||
| Hinders eating | |||
| Hinders communication | |||
| Risk of asphyxia in case of ventilator malfunction | |||
| Risk of bronchial aspiration | |||
| Total-face | More comfortable for prolonged use | Greater dead space | Continuous-flow devices |
| Easy to adjust | Should not be used in association with aerosol therapy | Single-limb circuit | |
| Less risk of face skin injury | Monitor for vomiting (attention to aspiration) | Use preferentially with NIV-specific ventilators or conventional ventilators with NIV module | |
| Minimum air leak | |||
| Helmet | More comfortable for prolonged use | Greater risk of CO2 rebreathing | Continuous-flow or demand-flow devices |
| No risk of face or skin injury | Favors patient-ventilator asynchrony | Dual- or single-limb circuit with PEEP valve in the helmet | |
| Risk of asphyxia in case of ventilator malfunction | |||
| Should not be used in association with aerosol therapy | |||
| High internal noise and greater feeling of pressure in the ears | |||
| Need of higher pressures to compensate for the dead space | |||
| Skin injury can occur in the axillae |
NIV - noninvasive ventilation; CO2 - carbon dioxide; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.
Figure 1Trigger asynchronies identified in volume-, flow- and pressure-time curves, indicated by arrows. Negative deflections in the pressure-time curves represent the patient’s inspiratory effort (muscle pressure), which are only visible when the esophageal pressure is monitored.
Panel A) Lost efforts. The first arrow indicates a weak stimulus, which is unable to trigger the ventilator, thus resulting in a small positive flow wave and minimal tidal volume. The second arrow points to effort during expiration, which failed to trigger the ventilator and merely sufficed for the flow to return to baseline and become slightly positive. Panel B) Double-triggering. Example in volume-controlled ventilation. The patient’s inspiratory efforts persist at the time of cycling-off, thus triggering another cycle. The corresponding volumes are added together (stacking), and the airway pressure increases, causing the high-pressure alarm to go off. Panel C) Auto-triggering. In the support pressure mode, some cycles are triggered without a patient inspiratory effort, which can be facilitated by leaks; this is observed in the volume-time curve, which does not return to baseline (the inspired volume is greater than the expired volume). Figures obtained at Xlung.net, a virtual mechanical ventilation simulator. Available at: http//:www.xlung.net.
Figure 2Flow asynchrony.
In volume-controlled mode, the flow rate was adjusted below the patient’s demand; the patient thus maintained muscle effort throughout inspiration, and the curve consequently became concave and upward. The asynchrony exhibits increasing intensity from the first to the third cycle, as represented in the figure. The negative deflections in the pressure-time curve represent the patient’s inspiratory effort (muscle pressure) and are only visible when esophageal pressure is monitored. Figures obtained at Xlung.net, a virtual mechanical ventilation simulator. Available at: http//:www.xlung.net.
Figure 3Cycling asynchronies during pressure support ventilation.
In the first cycle, the cutoff point of 25% of the peak inspiratory flow (percentage of the cycling criterion) was reached rapidly; the ventilator’s inspiratory time was therefore shorter than the time desired by the patient. This is shown in the expiratory segment of the flow curve, which tends to return to the baseline as a result of the patient’s inspiratory effort, which is still present. The last cycle represents the opposite situation, i.e., delayed cycling. The flow reduction occurs very slowly, which is typical of airway obstruction; the cycling threshold is therefore reached with some delay. Sometimes, the cycle is interrupted by a contraction of the respiratory muscles, which causes an increase above the support pressure adjusted at the end of inspiration (not shown in this figure). Figures obtained at Xlung.net, a virtual mechanical ventilation simulator. Available at: http//:www.xlung.net
Figure 4Inspiratory pause maneuver and estimation of the airway resistance and pause (or plateau) pressure.
VCV - volume-controlled ventilation. Paw - airway pressure; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure; Vt - tidal volume; Pel - elastic pressure; Palv - alveolar pressure.
The Berlin classification of acute respiratory distress syndrome(
|
|
|
|
|
| Timing | Acute onset within one week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms | ||
| Hypoxemia (PaO2/FlO2) | 201-300 with PEEP/CPAP ≥5 | 101-200 with PEEP ≥5 | ≤100 with PEEP ≥5 |
| Origin of edema | Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure orfluid overload | ||
| Chest imaging | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities | Bilateral opacities |
PaO2/FIO2 - relationship between oxygen partial pressure and fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure; CPAP - continuous positive airway pressure.
PEEP versus FiO2 to identify optimal PEEP in cases of mild ARDS
| FIO2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| PEEP | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 18↔24 |
Adapted from: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301-8. FiO2 - fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.
Adjustment of PEEP at high values to find the optimal PEEP in cases of moderate or severe ARDS
|
| |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIO2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5↔0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |||||
| PEEP | 12 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 22↔24 | |||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
| FIO2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |||||||
| PEEP | 5↔10 | 10↔18 | 18↔20 | 20 | 20 | 20↔22 | 22 | 22↔24 | |||||||
Based on studies ALVEOLI( and LOVS(. FiO2 - fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.