Literature DB >> 17005058

A decremental PEEP trial identifies the PEEP level that maintains oxygenation after lung recruitment.

Karim Girgis1, Hala Hamed, Yehia Khater, Robert M Kacmarek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a decremental trial of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to identify an optimal PEEP level that maintains oxygenation after a lung-recruitment maneuver.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty sedated patients with acute lung injury and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome, ventilated for 1.2 +/- 0.4 d. INTERVENTION: Each patient received up to 3 lung-recruitment maneuvers with continuous positive airway pressure of 40 cm H2O sustained for 40 s to increase the ratio of P(aO2) to F(IO2) by > 20%. Following the lung-recruitment maneuver, PEEP was set at 20 cm H2O and then the F(IO2) was decreased until the oxygen saturation (measured via pulse oximetry [S(pO2)]) was 90-94%. PEEP was then decreased in 2-cm H2O steps until the S(pO2) dropped below 90%. The step preceding the drop to below 90% was considered the optimal PEEP. The lung was then re-recruited and PEEP and F(IO2) were set at the identified levels. The patients were followed for 4 h after the PEEP trial and the setting of PEEP and F(IO2).
RESULTS: After the lung-recruitment maneuver, all the patients' P(aO2)/F(IO2) increased > 50%. The mean + SD P(aO2)/F(IO2) on the optimal decremental trial PEEP was 211 + 79 mm Hg, versus 135 + 37 mm Hg at baseline (p < 0.001), and was sustained at that level for the 4-h study period (227 + 81 mm Hg at 4 h). F(IO2) at baseline was 0.54 + 0.12 versus 0.38 + 0.12 (p < 0.001) at 4 h. PEEP was 11.9 + 3.0 cm H2O at baseline and 9.1 + 4.7 cm H2O (p = 0.011) at 4 h.
CONCLUSION: A decremental PEEP trial identifies a PEEP setting that sustains for 4 h the oxygenation benefit of a 40-cm H2O, 40-s lung-recruitment maneuver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  24 in total

1.  The "open lung" compromise.

Authors:  John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Can we estimate transpulmonary pressure without an esophageal balloon?-yes.

Authors:  Ola Stenqvist; Per Persson; Stefan Lundin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

3.  What is new in refractory hypoxemia?

Authors:  Jesús Villar; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Efficacy and safety of lung recruitment in pediatric patients with acute lung injury.

Authors:  Juan P Boriosi; Anil Sapru; James H Hanson; Jeanette Asselin; Ginny Gildengorin; Vivienne Newman; Katie Sabato; Heidi R Flori
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Should the ART trial change our practice?

Authors:  Jesús Villar; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Ventilator management for acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus infection: A case series.

Authors:  Hui Xie; Zhi-Gang Zhou; Wei Jin; Cheng-Bin Yuan; Jiang Du; Jian Lu; Rui-Lan Wang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2018

7.  Time to reach a new steady state after changes of positive end expiratory pressure.

Authors:  D Chiumello; S Coppola; S Froio; C Mietto; L Brazzi; E Carlesso; L Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A comparison of methods to identify open-lung PEEP.

Authors:  Maria Paula Caramez; Robert M Kacmarek; Mohamed Helmy; Eriko Miyoshi; Atul Malhotra; Marcelo B P Amato; R Scott Harris
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Zhanqi Zhao; Daniel Steinmann; Inéz Frerichs; Josef Guttmann; Knut Möller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.