Thoracic electrical impedance tomography is a real-time, noninvasive monitoring tool of the regional pulmonary ventilation distribution. Its bedside use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome has the potential to aid in alveolar recruitment maneuvers, which are often necessary in cases of refractory hypoxemia. In this case report, we describe the monitoring results and interpretation of thoracic electrical impedance tomography used during alveolar recruitment maneuvers in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome, with transient application of high alveolar pressures and optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration. Furthermore, we provide a brief literature review regarding the use of alveolar recruitment maneuvers and monitoring using thoracic electrical impedance tomography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Thoracic electrical impedance tomography is a real-time, noninvasive monitoring tool of the regional pulmonary ventilation distribution. Its bedside use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome has the potential to aid in alveolar recruitment maneuvers, which are often necessary in cases of refractory hypoxemia. In this case report, we describe the monitoring results and interpretation of thoracic electrical impedance tomography used during alveolar recruitment maneuvers in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome, with transient application of high alveolar pressures and optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration. Furthermore, we provide a brief literature review regarding the use of alveolar recruitment maneuvers and monitoring using thoracic electrical impedance tomography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by acute onset respiratory
failure associated with severe hypoxemia (oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired
oxygen - PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300mmHg) and bilateral pulmonary
infiltrates not fully explained by heart failure or fluid overload.( According to the Berlin criteria, ARDS
may be classified as mild (PaO2/FiO2 ranging from 201 to 300mmHg),
moderate (PaO2/FiO2 ranging from 101 to 200mmHg) or severe
(PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100mmHg).( ARDS continues to be correlated with high mortality
rates, which may reach 36% to 44% in specialized centers, despite the progress made in
treatment in recent decades.(Patients with ARDS often require intensive treatment using mechanical ventilation (MV),
given the severity of their respiratory failure. However, MV may have deleterious
effects on lung tissue and may even contribute to worsening of ARDS.(
This deleterious effect was demonstrated in studies evaluating the impact of MV with
high tidal volumes and plateau pressure levels.( Therefore, MV adjustment
is recommended to avoid or minimize ventilator-associated lung injuries.( This goal must be dynamically reached and should be based on
information from the monitoring of the pulmonary function and respiratory mechanics of
patients with ARDS.The use of alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) has been proposed as complementary
therapy to ventilation strategies for patients with severe ARDS and refractory
hypoxemia.( Those maneuvers aim to expand collapsed alveoli using a
transient increase in transpulmonary pressure and by subsequently applying adequate
positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent alveolar derecruitment. This strategy
aims to strike an adequate balance between the number of collapsed and hyperextended
alveoli, which reduces the pulmonary shunt and therefore improves the
ventilation/perfusion ratio and hypoxemia.(The bedside use of thoracic electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in patients with ARDS
may be a key auxiliary tool for ARM by enabling clinicians to choose an optimal PEEP for
maximum recruitment after considering key variables, including pulmonary static
compliance (Cst), recruitable alveolar collapse and alveolar overdistension. That
examination is based on existing differences in electrical properties generated by
changes in air content in small lung areas, which create an impedance relationship
between such areas.( The pixels
generated in the image of the monitor represent changes in the percentage of local
impedance compared with a reference assessed in the beginning of the image acquisition.
Thus, the dynamic image of the thoracic EIT monitor shows local air change during
ventilation in real time. Color variation in the generated image shows areas within the
alveoli that undergo air changes, with a scale ranging from dark blue (lower aeration)
to light blue (higher aeration). Grey images represent areas in which no aeration change
occurred.( During the
decremental PEEP titration maneuver, alveolar collapse may occur in specific lung areas
(causing reduced Cst), and alveolar overdistension relief may occur in other lung areas
(causing increased Cst). The degree of recruitable alveolar collapse is estimated by the
reduction in pixel compliance, in relation to its best compliance, caused by the reduced
PEEP value. Conversely, alveolar overdistension represents the reduction in pixel
compliance, in relation to its best compliance, caused by increased PEEP.In the present case report, we describe the application of thoracic EIT in a patient
with severe ARDS during ARM with transient application of high alveolar pressures and
optimal PEEP titration.
CASE REPORT
A 63-year-old Caucasian male patient with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis caused by
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary
hospital for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Upon hospital admission, the patient
had fever, productive cough and dyspnea. Chest X-ray showed an initial focus of
bronchopneumonic consolidation in the right lower lobe. The patient developed hypoxic
respiratory failure associated with worsened pulmonary radiological condition, showing
extensive bilateral alveolar consolidations, even after initiation of antibiotic therapy
using piperacillin/tazobactam and clarithromycin, hydration and respiratory support with
oxygen therapy by nasal cannula. Bedside transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal
systolic function of the left and right ventricles. Following the diagnosis of ARDS, the
patient was managed with continuous parenteral sedoanalgesia, neuromuscular block and
protective MV with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted weight and PEEP/FIO2
ratio according to the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSnet)
protocol.( However, severe
hypoxemia (112mmHg PaO2/FiO2) and high alveolar pressures
(34cmH2O plateau pressure) persisted, even after MV optimization. At that
time, the patient was monitored using a Timpel Enlight 1800® (São
Paulo, Brasil) thoracic electrical impedance tomograph (Figure 1), which showed asymmetric ventilation distribution (Figure 2), highlighting the hypoventilation of the
left lung and posterior lung fields. Alveolar recruitment with transient application of
high alveolar pressures, using the pressure-controlled ventilation mode
(40cmH2O PEEP, 20cmH2O pressure above PEEP and 1:1
inspiratory/expiratory time ratio) for 2 minutes was used after normovolemia was
confirmed using ultrasonographic evaluation of the inferior cava vein variability. No
hemodynamic instability occurred during the process. The analysis of the thoracic EIT
following ARM (Figure 3) showed improved lung
ventilation distribution compared with the initial examination, highlighting the
increased ventilation in previously collapsed areas. Following ARM, the optimal PEEP was
calculated using the ratios between PEEP, Cst and alveolar collapse and overdistension
indices (Figures 4, 5 and 6). Decremental PEEP titration was
performed in 2-cmH2O steps. The PEEP associated with the highest Cst values
and lowest alveolar collapse and overdistension values was chosen. Based on the analysis
of the plot generated by the thoracic EIT, 16cmH2O PEEP was deemed optimal in
this situation because it showed the best ratio between Cst and alveolar collapse and
overdistension; values lower than 16cmH2O were associated with lower Cst
values and higher lung collapse values, and PEEP values higher than 16cmH2O
were associated with higher values of alveolar overdistension. Then, the patient was
recruited again, as described above, and the ventilatory parameters were maintained with
a tidal volume of 6mL/kg predicted weight and 16cmH2O PEEP. At this time, the
plateau pressure measured was 26cmH2O, and the
PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 226mmHg.
Figure 1
Positioning of the electrodes for thoracic electrical impedance tomography.
The electrodes for thoracic electrical impedance tomography are attached to the
chest wall using a strap placed across the chest, near the level of the mammary
line (between the fourth and fifth intercostal spaces). A flow sensor
positioned between the endotracheal tube and the "Y" of the ventilator circuit
is also connected to the monitor for electrical impedance tomography, in
addition to the electrocardiogram electrodes (not shown in this Figure). EIT -
electrical impedance tomography.
Figure 2
Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: distribution of pulmonary ventilation
before the alveolar recruitment maneuver.
Image of a chest cross-section (at the level of the electrode position). An
asymmetric distribution of alveolar ventilation is noted with reduced
distribution of ventilation in the left lung and in posterior lung fields. R -
right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.
Figure 3
Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: distribution of pulmonary ventilation
after the alveolar recruitment maneuver.
Image of a chest cross-section (at the level of the electrode position). A more
homogeneous distribution of alveolar ventilation is noted in comparison with
Figure 2. A higher ventilation of
previously underventilated lung areas (left lung and posterior lung fields)
occurred. R - right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.
Figure 4
Graphical representation of decremental positive end-expiratory pressure
titration after the alveolar recruitment maneuver.
Graphical representation of the plateau pressure performance and pulmonary
plethysmography during the decremental positive end-expiratory pressure
titration. PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.
Figure 5
Ratios between static compliance, alveolar collapse and alveolar overdistension
according to the positive end-expiratory pressure applied.
Graphical representation of the values of lung static compliance, alveolar
collapse index and alveolar overdistension index for each positive
end-expiratory pressure value. Note the decrease in alveolar overdistension
index and increase in alveolar collapse index with the progressive decrease in
positive end-expiratory pressure. The values of lung static compliance have a
nonlinear correlation with the positive end-expiratory pressure, producing a
more pronounced decrease in lung static compliance for positive end-expiratory
pressure values lower than 15cmH2O in this case. PEEP - positive
end-expiratory pressure.
Figure 6
Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: alveolar collapse and overdistension
areas according to the positive end-expiratory pressure applied.
Graphical representation of the sites of occurrence of alveolar overdistension
and collapse for each positive end-expiratory pressure applied. The
hyperdistended areas are shown in white. The collapsed areas are shown in dark
blue. The occurrence of alveolar overdistension is noted in anterior right lung
fields for higher values of positive end-expiratory pressure. The occurrence of
alveolar collapse is noted, especially in the left lung and posterior lung
fields, for lower values of positive end-expiratory pressure. PEEP - positive
end-expiratory pressure; R - right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.
Positioning of the electrodes for thoracic electrical impedance tomography.The electrodes for thoracic electrical impedance tomography are attached to the
chest wall using a strap placed across the chest, near the level of the mammary
line (between the fourth and fifth intercostal spaces). A flow sensor
positioned between the endotracheal tube and the "Y" of the ventilator circuit
is also connected to the monitor for electrical impedance tomography, in
addition to the electrocardiogram electrodes (not shown in this Figure). EIT -
electrical impedance tomography.Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: distribution of pulmonary ventilation
before the alveolar recruitment maneuver.Image of a chest cross-section (at the level of the electrode position). An
asymmetric distribution of alveolar ventilation is noted with reduced
distribution of ventilation in the left lung and in posterior lung fields. R -
right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: distribution of pulmonary ventilation
after the alveolar recruitment maneuver.Image of a chest cross-section (at the level of the electrode position). A more
homogeneous distribution of alveolar ventilation is noted in comparison with
Figure 2. A higher ventilation of
previously underventilated lung areas (left lung and posterior lung fields)
occurred. R - right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.Graphical representation of decremental positive end-expiratory pressure
titration after the alveolar recruitment maneuver.Graphical representation of the plateau pressure performance and pulmonary
plethysmography during the decremental positive end-expiratory pressure
titration. PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure.Ratios between static compliance, alveolar collapse and alveolar overdistension
according to the positive end-expiratory pressure applied.Graphical representation of the values of lung static compliance, alveolar
collapse index and alveolar overdistension index for each positive
end-expiratory pressure value. Note the decrease in alveolar overdistension
index and increase in alveolar collapse index with the progressive decrease in
positive end-expiratory pressure. The values of lung static compliance have a
nonlinear correlation with the positive end-expiratory pressure, producing a
more pronounced decrease in lung static compliance for positive end-expiratory
pressure values lower than 15cmH2O in this case. PEEP - positive
end-expiratory pressure.Thoracic electrical impedance tomography: alveolar collapse and overdistension
areas according to the positive end-expiratory pressure applied.Graphical representation of the sites of occurrence of alveolar overdistension
and collapse for each positive end-expiratory pressure applied. The
hyperdistended areas are shown in white. The collapsed areas are shown in dark
blue. The occurrence of alveolar overdistension is noted in anterior right lung
fields for higher values of positive end-expiratory pressure. The occurrence of
alveolar collapse is noted, especially in the left lung and posterior lung
fields, for lower values of positive end-expiratory pressure. PEEP - positive
end-expiratory pressure; R - right; L - left; A - anterior; P - posterior.
DISCUSSION
Alveolar recruitment may be defined as a strategy that transiently increases alveolar
pressure above the regular tidal ventilation, including (but not limited to) sustained
inflation maneuvers, gradual PEEP increase, tidal volume increase or controlled pressure
and extended sighs. Alveolar recruitment aims to improve gas exchange through maximum
recruitment of alveolar units, providing more homogeneous ventilation of the lung
parenchyma. The ARM described in the case reported, with subsequent PEEP titration to
maintain open lungs with an optimal ratio between alveolar collapse and overdistension,
was initially evaluated by computerized tomographic analysis.( This strategy aims to open the lungs early and to keep
them open, as initially advocated by Lachmann,( in order to achieve improved lung function and avoid a potential
lung injury associated with MV.(Because ARDS is a biphasic disease that progresses from an acute exudative phase to an
organization phase with persistent alveolar and interstitial fibrosis, early diagnosis,
preferably within 72 hours, is crucial for effective ARM and for maintenance of alveolar
opening with sufficient PEEP.( A study analyzing 85 patients with ARDS
classified according to the extent of fibroproliferation in the computed tomography scan
showed that higher computed tomography scores were associated with a significant
decrease in days free of organ dysfunction and days free of MV; higher scores were an
independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio: 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]:
1.06 - 1.36; p < 0.005).( A
recent meta-analysis( of 10
randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effects of ARM on patients with ARDS
showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.95) for in-hospital mortality.
However, the quality of evidence was low, given the risk of bias in the included
studies, as ARM was usually performed in conjunction with other ventilatory
interventions that may have affected the outcome of interest. In the present study, no
differences were observed in the barotrauma rates (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.78 - 1.57) or in
the need for rescue therapies (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.41 - 1.40). Most studies failed to
show any difference between groups regarding the duration of MV and the length of ICU or
hospital stay. Ongoing studies may best assess whether ARM should be routinely applied
to optimize the clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS.(EIT is a noninvasive method of bedside monitoring that provides real-time information on
the regional distribution of changes in the electrical resistivity of the lung tissue
resulting from ventilation or blood flow (perfusion) variations in relation to a
predetermined reference.( Data provided by EIT may directly
quantify local pulmonary impedance changes. Therefore, functionally active pulmonary
structures are shown, while functionally static, normal or pathologically structures
(for example, pleural or pneumothorax effusion) are not captured by the method and are
not imaged. Several animal and human studies have validated the pulmonary findings of
thoracic EIT.( However, that linear correlation fundamentally depends
on the position of the electrode, changes in the thoracic wall and diaphragm shape and
the ratio of tidal ventilation distributed in lung areas.(The definition of collapsed and overdistended lung areas may enable thoracic EIT to be
used as a bedside clinical tool for adjusting the MV parameters. When calculating the
potentially recruitable lung volume as the difference between the open, totally
recruited and non-recruited lung volume at 40cmH2O, Lowhagen et
al.( observed a significant
value of potentially recruitable lung volume of 26 ± 11% (11% to 47%) in patients with
ARDS. The same group also analyzed the regional distribution of intratidal gas upon
changes in regional lung mechanics using EIT data and airway pressure at different PEEP
levels.( The tidal volume was
primarily distributed in the medio-ventral areas, although the increase in PEEP caused
redistribution into the more dorsal areas, regardless of the PEEP level. A recent
clinical study showed that thoracic EIT performed immediately above the diaphragm could
detect alveolar derecruitment during a decremental PEEP maneuver, both in dependent and
non-dependent lung areas, and also show alveolar collapse.( Recently, Costa et al.( evaluated a new algorithm to estimate hyperinsuflation
during a decremental PEEP maneuver and showed that the hyperinsuflation lung areas were
particularly similar when comparing EIT with CT, although EIT systematically had a
higher overdistension coefficient. The authors concluded that the EIT estimates of
hyperinsuflation mostly account for the functional deterioration of pulmonary units,
rather than anatomic changes of those areas.
CONCLUSION
The bedside use of thoracic electrical impedance tomography may be a clinical tool that
is able to guide, at each breath, possible adjustments of regional ventilation,
including the decision for alveolar recruitment maneuvers, in patients with acute
respiratory distress syndrome. Furthermore, electrical impedance tomography may refine
the choice of optimal post-recruitment positive end-expiratory pressure, considering the
quantification of possibly deleterious variables, including alveolar collapse and
overdistension. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the use of this device combined
with software to help identify situations in which mechanical ventilation could be
optimized.
Authors: M B Amato; C S Barbas; D M Medeiros; R B Magaldi; G P Schettino; G Lorenzi-Filho; R A Kairalla; D Deheinzelin; C Munoz; R Oliveira; T Y Takagaki; C R Carvalho Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Li Su; Rihong Zhai; Chau-Chyun Sheu; Diana C Gallagher; Michelle N Gong; Paula Tejera; B Taylor Thompson; David C Christiani Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272