Literature DB >> 25027407

Evaluation of preoperative serum markers for individual patient prognosis in stage I-III rectal cancer.

Clemens Giessen1, Dorothea Nagel, Maria Glas, Fritz Spelsberg, Ulla Lau-Werner, Dominik Paul Modest, Marlies Michl, Volker Heinemann, Petra Stieber, Christoph Schulz.   

Abstract

Several independent serum biomarkers have been proposed as prognostic and/or predictive markers for colorectal cancer (CRC). To this date, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) remains the only recommended serological CRC biomarker. The present retrospective analysis investigates the prognostic value of several serum markers. A total of 256 patients with rectal cancer underwent surgery for curative intent in a university cancer center between January 1988 and June 2007. Preoperative serum was retrospectively analyzed for albumin, alkaline phosphatase (aP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, bilirubin, CA 125, cancer antigen 19-9, cancer antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4), CEA, CRP, CYFRA 21-1, ferritin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, glutamate oxaloacetate transanunase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, hemoglobin, haptoglobin, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, creatinine, lactate-dehydrogenase, serum amyloid A (SAA), and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated. Median follow-up time was 8.4 years. Overall 3- and 5-year CSS was 88.6 and 78.9 %, respectively. DFS rates were 72.8 % (3 years) and 67.5 % (5 years). Univariate analysis of CSS indicated aP, CA 72-4, CEA, and SAA as prognostic factors, while aP, CEA, and SAA were also prognostic with regard to DFS. Multivariate analysis confirmed SAA together with T and N stage as prognostic factors. According to UICC stage, CEA and SAA add prognostic value in stages II and III with regard to DFS and CSS, respectively. The combined use of CEA and SAA is able to identify patients with favorable and poor prognosis. In addition to tumor baseline parameters, routine analysis of SAA together with CEA provided markedly improved prognostic value on CSS and DFS in resected rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027407     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2338-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  29 in total

1.  Outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer depends on the primary tumor site (midgut vs. hindgut): analysis of the FIRE1-trial (FuFIRI or mIROX as first-line treatment).

Authors:  Dominik P Modest; Christoph Schulz; Ludwig F von Weikersthal; Detlef Quietzsch; Jobst C von Einem; Andreas Schalhorn; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Rüdiger P Laubender; Clemens Giessen; Sebastian Stintzing; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.248

2.  Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.

Authors:  L Stocchi; H Nelson; D J Sargent; M J O'Connell; J E Tepper; J E Krook; R Beart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Experience of 1446 rectal cancer patients in Korea and analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Y J Park; E G Youk; H S Choi; S U Han; K J Park; K U Lee; K J Choe; J G Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Serum amyloid A protein (SAA) in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  I Glojnarić; M T Casl; D Simić; J Lukac
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012.

Authors:  J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Serum amyloid A (SAA) variations in patients with cancer: correlation with disease activity, stage, primary site, and prognosis.

Authors:  H Biran; N Friedman; L Neumann; M Pras; R Shainkin-Kestenbaum
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use.

Authors:  M J Duffy; A van Dalen; C Haglund; L Hansson; E Holinski-Feder; R Klapdor; R Lamerz; P Peltomaki; C Sturgeon; O Topolcan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Serum amyloid A: an acute-phase protein involved in tumour pathogenesis.

Authors:  E Malle; S Sodin-Semrl; A Kovacevic
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Prognostic significance of CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal cancer in Kuwait.

Authors:  A I Behbehani; H Al-Sayer; M Farghaly; N Kanawati; A Mathew; A al-Bader; A Van Dalen
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of vitamin D in hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Shaw; N Massaro; N T Brockton
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Revelation of Proteomic Indicators for Colorectal Cancer in Initial Stages of Development.

Authors:  Arthur T Kopylov; Alexander A Stepanov; Kristina A Malsagova; Deepesh Soni; Nikolay E Kushlinsky; Dmitry V Enikeev; Natalia V Potoldykova; Andrey V Lisitsa; Anna L Kaysheva
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Gustaw Lech; Robert Słotwiński; Maciej Słodkowski; Ireneusz Wojciech Krasnodębski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Alkaline phosphatase: a potential biomarker for stroke and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Allison L Brichacek; Candice M Brown
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  Preoperative serum markers for individual patient prognosis in stage I-III colon cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Giessen-Jung; Dorothea Nagel; Maria Glas; Fritz Spelsberg; Ulla Lau-Werner; Dominik Paul Modest; Christoph Schulz; Volker Heinemann; Dorit Di Gioia; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-08

6.  The prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase levels in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanghua Li; Zhao Wang; Jianbo Xu; Hui Wu; Shirong Cai; Yulong He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Preoperative Serum Interleukin-6 Is a Potential Prognostic Factor for Colorectal Cancer, including Stage II Patients.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Shiga; Masayasu Hara; Takaya Nagasaki; Takafumi Sato; Hiroki Takahashi; Mikinori Sato; Hiromitsu Takeyama
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Nomogram basing pre-treatment parameters predicting early response for locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: a subgroup efficacy analysis of FOWARC study.

Authors:  Jianwei Zhang; Yue Cai; Huabin Hu; Ping Lan; Lei Wang; Meijin Huang; Liang Kang; Xiaojian Wu; Hui Wang; Jiayu Ling; Jian Xiao; Jianping Wang; Yanhong Deng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-26

9.  Serum Ferritin as a Prognostic Biomarker for Survival in Relapsed or Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sookyung Lee; Anna Song; Wankyu Eo
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Elevated CA19-9 as the Most Significant Prognostic Factor in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Lu-Ning Zhang; Pu-Yun OuYang; Wei-Wei Xiao; Xin Yu; Kai-Yun You; Zhi-Fan Zeng; Rui-Hua Xu; Yuan-Hong Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.