Literature DB >> 11559727

Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.

L Stocchi1, H Nelson, D J Sargent, M J O'Connell, J E Tepper, J E Krook, R Beart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Substantial and successful effort has been focused on decreasing the risk of local failure after rectal cancer surgery through the use of adjuvant therapies. Our study examined data from studies conducted by United States cooperative groups to investigate the impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical and pathologic reports from 673 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer enrolled onto three adjuvant clinical trials were reviewed for tumor and surgical variables. Additional information on individual institutions and operating surgeon was collected. Variables were tested for association with 5-year local recurrence and survival after adjustment for adjuvant treatments and other important prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Five-year local recurrence and survival rates were 16% and 59%, respectively. Surgeons treating more than 10 study cases had lower local recurrence rates than those treating < or = 10 (11% v 17%, P =.02). Free radial margins also correlated with local recurrence (P =.01). Type of surgery, distal margins, and tumor radial spread were not significant. Tumor adherence to adjacent structures predicted local recurrence (35% v 14%, P <.001) and survival (30% v 63%, P <.001), regardless of en bloc resection. Although T and N classification predicted survival (P <.001), only N classification correlated with local recurrence. The number and percentage of positive nodes correlated with survival, but only the percentage independently predicted local recurrence. Several pathologic and surgical variables were reported suboptimally.
CONCLUSION: Moderate variability in outcomes among surgeons was detected in this high-risk population. Efforts to improve surgical results will require changes in reporting practices to allow for more accurate assessment of the quality of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559727     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  40 in total

1.  The effect of the surgeon and the pathologist on patient survival after resection of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  James W Fleshman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Yao-Jen Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Kah Hoong Chang; Myles J Smith; Oliver J McAnena; Arifin S Aprjanto; Joe F Dowdall
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Nodal spread and micrometastasis within mesorectum.

Authors:  Cun Wang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhao Wang; Dai-Yun Chen; Yang-Chun Zheng; Gao-Ping Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The surgeon's expertise-outcome relationship in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Wansik Yu; Young Kook Yun; Ilwoo Whang; Gyu Seok Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Local recurrence after rectal cancer treatment in Manitoba.

Authors:  Steven Latosinsky; Donna Turner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Sphincter-sparing resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

8.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Wladimir Nadalin; Jorge Sabbaga; Ulysses Ribeiro; Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa; Fábio Guilherme Campos; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.