Literature DB >> 10367255

Experience of 1446 rectal cancer patients in Korea and analysis of prognostic factors.

Y J Park1, E G Youk, H S Choi, S U Han, K J Park, K U Lee, K J Choe, J G Park.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the changing pattern of rectal cancers in Korea and to identify prognostic factors, we investigated the case histories of 1446 rectal cancer patients who had received surgical treatment. During the study period there were trends toward a decrease in the ratio of rectal cancer to colon cancer, earlier detection (more Dukes' stages A and B and fewer C), a decrease in the number of abdominoperineal resections, and an increase in the number of sphincter-preserving operations. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors showed that gender, obstruction symptoms, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor size, depth of bowel wall invasion, lymph node metastases (presence and number), tumor differentiation, operative method, and date of operation were significant, but age, symptom duration, and tumor location were not. The use of sphincter-saving operations did not adversely affect the clinical outcome. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node metastasis factor to be the most significant factor (P < 0.001); the depth of bowel wall invasion, differentiation, CEA level, and date of operation were also significant (0.001 < P < 0.05). This study shows that although anatomical extent of disease (depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis) is the most reliable prognostic predictor in rectal cancer, other factors such as preoperative CEA level and tumor differentiation also provide important information on the outcome and use of an anal-preserving operation does not adversely affect the patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10367255     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic inhomogeneity in pT3 rectal carcinomas: what are the clinical consequences?

Authors:  B Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Progress in the development of prognostic and predictive markers for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Crystal S Denlinger; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-10

3.  Evaluation of preoperative serum markers for individual patient prognosis in stage I-III rectal cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Giessen; Dorothea Nagel; Maria Glas; Fritz Spelsberg; Ulla Lau-Werner; Dominik Paul Modest; Marlies Michl; Volker Heinemann; Petra Stieber; Christoph Schulz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-17

4.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal rectal cancer surgery: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Siegel; M A Cuesta; E Targarona; F G Bader; M Morino; R Corcelles; A M Lacy; L Påhlman; E Haglind; K Bujko; H P Bruch; M M Heiss; M Eikermann; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical features of colorectal cancer detected by the national cancer screening program.

Authors:  Dae-Do Park; Rumi Shin; Ji-Sun Kim; Heung-Kwon Oh; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-12-31

6.  Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Gahb Park; Min-Ro Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang-Won Hong; Sang-Nam Yoon; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung-Chul Heo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Rectal adenocarcinoma: proposal for a model based on pretreatment prognostic factors.

Authors:  Fernando Cabanillas; Mariely Nieves-Plaza; Gerardo Quevedo; Ignacio A Echenique
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.705

Review 8.  Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Di Betta; A D'Hoore; L Filez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Single immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Sohn; Seung-Yong Jeong; Hyo Seong Choi; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Myeong Huh; Dae-Hyun Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Kyung Hae Jung; Joong-Bae Ahn; Hyun Kyung Kim; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 10.  Staging, prognostic factors, and therapy of localized rectal cancer.

Authors:  Prajnan Das; Christopher H Crane
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.