BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA is rapidly rising. Surveillance using biannual ultrasound (US) is recommended, but actual practices are unknown. AIM: To determine current HCC surveillance practices among gastroenterology and hepatology providers in the USA. METHODS: A 21-question electronic survey was emailed to 12,485 gastroenterology and hepatology providers in the USA. The survey contained questions concerning provider background, surveillance practices, and opinions. Pearson chi-square and multivariate logistic regression tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: We received 777 responses (6.2% response rate); 656 were eligible for analysis. 92% place cirrhotic patients under surveillance independent of etiology, 79% exclusively use a 6-month interval, and 77% use alpha-fetoprotein. While 93% use US, only 36% use US exclusively and 60% use two or more imaging modalities. Providers from transplant centers favor using additional imaging modalities, instead of only US. Multivariate analysis showed transplant center providers who allocate more time to patient care (OR 1.96, p = 0.004) and see more cirrhotic patients (OR 2.07, p = 0.033) have increased odds of using additional imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Participating providers reported very high rates of surveillance utilization and use of a biannual interval. It is likely that the sample is composed of providers who are very engaged and informed about HCC surveillance. However, their surveillance imaging practices largely deviated from practice guidelines, which all recommend only using US. Providers affiliated with transplant centers tend to use additional imaging modalities such as computed tomography and MRI, instead of US only.
BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA is rapidly rising. Surveillance using biannual ultrasound (US) is recommended, but actual practices are unknown. AIM: To determine current HCC surveillance practices among gastroenterology and hepatology providers in the USA. METHODS: A 21-question electronic survey was emailed to 12,485 gastroenterology and hepatology providers in the USA. The survey contained questions concerning provider background, surveillance practices, and opinions. Pearson chi-square and multivariate logistic regression tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: We received 777 responses (6.2% response rate); 656 were eligible for analysis. 92% place cirrhotic patients under surveillance independent of etiology, 79% exclusively use a 6-month interval, and 77% use alpha-fetoprotein. While 93% use US, only 36% use US exclusively and 60% use two or more imaging modalities. Providers from transplant centers favor using additional imaging modalities, instead of only US. Multivariate analysis showed transplant center providers who allocate more time to patient care (OR 1.96, p = 0.004) and see more cirrhotic patients (OR 2.07, p = 0.033) have increased odds of using additional imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Participating providers reported very high rates of surveillance utilization and use of a biannual interval. It is likely that the sample is composed of providers who are very engaged and informed about HCC surveillance. However, their surveillance imaging practices largely deviated from practice guidelines, which all recommend only using US. Providers affiliated with transplant centers tend to use additional imaging modalities such as computed tomography and MRI, instead of US only.
Authors: Nam C Yu; Vinika Chaudhari; Steven S Raman; Charles Lassman; Myron J Tong; Ronald W Busuttil; David S K Lu Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Amit G Singal; Adam Yopp; Celette S Skinner; Milton Packer; William M Lee; Jasmin A Tiro Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Robert O Morgan; Peter A Richardson; Xianglin L Du; Katherine A McGlynn; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: N Chalasani; J C Horlander; A Said; H Hoen; K K Kopecky; S M Stockberger; R Manam; P Y Kwo; L Lumeng Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: A Singal; M L Volk; A Waljee; R Salgia; P Higgins; M A M Rogers; J A Marrero Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Gregg E Trahey; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Kristina Tzartzeva; Joseph Obi; Nicole E Rich; Neehar D Parikh; Jorge A Marrero; Adam Yopp; Akbar K Waljee; Amit G Singal Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Omair Atiq; Jasmin Tiro; Adam C Yopp; Adam Muffler; Jorge A Marrero; Neehar D Parikh; Caitlin Murphy; Katharine McCallister; Amit G Singal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: So Yeon Kim; Jihyun An; Young-Suk Lim; Seungbong Han; Ji-Young Lee; Jae Ho Byun; Hyung Jin Won; So Jung Lee; Han Chu Lee; Yung Sang Lee Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Nicole J Kim; Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror; David A Jacob; Nicole E Rich; Amit G Singal; Elizabeth S Aby; Ju Dong Yang; Veronica Nguyen; Anjana Pillai; Michael Fuchs; Andrew M Moon; Hersh Shroff; Parul D Agarwal; Ponni Perumalswami; Shaun Chandna; Kali Zhou; Yuval A Patel; Nyan L Latt; Robert Wong; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Christina C Lindenmeyer; Catherine Frenette; Jin Ge; Neil Mehta; Francis Yao; Jihane N Benhammou; Patricia P Bloom; Michael Leise; Hyun-Seok Kim; Cynthia Levy; Abbey Barnard; Mandana Khalili; George N Ioannou Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 11.382