Kristina Tzartzeva1, Joseph Obi1, Nicole E Rich1, Neehar D Parikh2, Jorge A Marrero1, Adam Yopp3, Akbar K Waljee4, Amit G Singal5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: amit.singal@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Society guidelines differ in their recommendations for surveillance to detect early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. We compared the performance of surveillance imaging, with or without alpha fetoprotein (AFP), for early detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Two reviewers searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1990 through August 2016 to identify published sensitivity and specificity of surveillance strategies for overall and early detection of HCC. Pooled estimates were calculated and compared using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (comprising 13,367 patients) characterized sensitivity of imaging with or without AFP measurement for detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Ultrasound detected any stage HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-92%), but early-stage HCC with only 47% sensitivity (95% CI 33%-61%). In studies comparing ultrasound with vs without AFP measurement, ultrasound detected any stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and early-stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93). However, ultrasound alone detected HCC with a higher level of specificity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.09). Ultrasound with vs without AFP detected early-stage HCC with 63% sensitivity (95% CI 48%-75%) and 45% sensitivity (95% CI 30%-62%), respectively (P = .002). Only 4 studies evaluated computed tomography or magnetic resonance image-based surveillance, which detected HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% CI 70%-92%). CONCLUSIONS: We found ultrasound alone has a low sensitivity to detect early stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Addition of AFP to ultrasound significantly increases sensitivity of early HCC detection in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Society guidelines differ in their recommendations for surveillance to detect early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. We compared the performance of surveillance imaging, with or without alpha fetoprotein (AFP), for early detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Two reviewers searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1990 through August 2016 to identify published sensitivity and specificity of surveillance strategies for overall and early detection of HCC. Pooled estimates were calculated and compared using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (comprising 13,367 patients) characterized sensitivity of imaging with or without AFP measurement for detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Ultrasound detected any stage HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-92%), but early-stage HCC with only 47% sensitivity (95% CI 33%-61%). In studies comparing ultrasound with vs without AFP measurement, ultrasound detected any stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and early-stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93). However, ultrasound alone detected HCC with a higher level of specificity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.09). Ultrasound with vs without AFP detected early-stage HCC with 63% sensitivity (95% CI 48%-75%) and 45% sensitivity (95% CI 30%-62%), respectively (P = .002). Only 4 studies evaluated computed tomography or magnetic resonance image-based surveillance, which detected HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% CI 70%-92%). CONCLUSIONS: We found ultrasound alone has a low sensitivity to detect early stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Addition of AFP to ultrasound significantly increases sensitivity of early HCC detection in clinical practice.
Authors: Omair Atiq; Jasmin Tiro; Adam C Yopp; Adam Muffler; Jorge A Marrero; Neehar D Parikh; Caitlin Murphy; Katharine McCallister; Amit G Singal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Purva Gopal; Adam C Yopp; Akbar K Waljee; Jason Chiang; Mahendra Nehra; Pragathi Kandunoori; Amit G Singal Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: D Pateron; N Ganne; J C Trinchet; M H Aurousseau; F Mal; C Meicler; E Coderc; P Reboullet; M Beaugrand Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-03-14 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Jinping Liu; Wei Tang; Anuradha Budhu; Marshonna Forgues; Maria O Hernandez; Julián Candia; Yujin Kim; Elise D Bowman; Stefan Ambs; Yongmei Zhao; Bao Tran; Xiaolin Wu; Christopher Koh; Pallavi Surana; T Jake Liang; Maria Guarnera; Dean Mann; Manoj Rajaure; Tim F Greten; Zhanwei Wang; Herbert Yu; Xin Wei Wang Journal: Cell Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Monica A Konerman; Aashesh Verma; Betty Zhao; Amit G Singal; Anna S Lok; Neehar D Parikh Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Shuchi K Rodgers; David T Fetzer; Helena Gabriel; James H Seow; Hailey H Choi; Katherine E Maturen; Ashish P Wasnik; Tara A Morgan; Nirvikar Dahiya; Mary K O'Boyle; Yuko Kono; Claude B Sirlin; Aya Kamaya Journal: Radiographics Date: 2019 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333