Literature DB >> 25027183

A one night stand? Reproductive excursions of female roe deer as a breeding dispersal tactic.

Lucie Debeffe1, Stefano Focardi, Christophe Bonenfant, A J Mark Hewison, Nicolas Morellet, Cécile Vanpé, Marco Heurich, Petter Kjellander, John D C Linnell, Atle Mysterud, Maryline Pellerin, Pavel Sustr, Ferdinando Urbano, Francesca Cagnacci.   

Abstract

Breeding dispersal, defined as the net movement between successive breeding sites, remains a poorly understood and seldom reported phenomenon in mammals, despite its importance for population dynamics and genetics. In large herbivores, females may be more mobile during the breeding season, undertaking short-term trips (excursions) outside their normal home range. If fertilisation occurs, leading to gene flow of the male genome, this behaviour could be considered a form of breeding dispersal from a genetic point of view. Here, we investigated ranging behaviour of 235 adult roe deer using intensive GPS monitoring in six populations across Europe within the EURODEER initiative. We show that excursions are common from June to August among females, with 41.8% (vs. 18.1% of males) making at least one excursion. Most individuals performed only one excursion per season and departure dates for females were concentrated in time, centred on the rutting period, suggesting a link with reproduction. The distance females travelled during excursions was significantly greater than the site-specific average diameter of a male home range, while travel speed decreased once they progressed beyond this diameter, indicating search behaviour or interaction with other male(s) outside the resident male's territory. Because adults are normally highly sedentary, the potential for mating with relatives is substantial; hence, we conclude that rut excursions could be an alternative tactic enabling females to avoid mating with a closely related male. To understand better the ultimate drivers at play, it will be crucial to explore the genetic causes and consequences of this behaviour.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027183     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3021-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates.

Authors:  Luca Börger; Novella Franconi; Giampiero De Michele; Alberto Gantz; Fiora Meschi; Andrea Manica; Sandro Lovari; Tim Coulson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Heterozygosity-fitness correlations revealed by neutral and candidate gene markers in roe deer from a long-term study.

Authors:  Anne Da Silva; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; A J Mark Hewison; Max Galan; Tim Coulson; Dominique Allainé; Laurence Vial; Daniel Delorme; Guy Van Laere; François Klein; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Access to mates in a territorial ungulate is determined by the size of a male's territory, but not by its habitat quality.

Authors:  Cécile Vanpé; Nicolas Morellet; Petter Kjellander; Michel Goulard; Olof Liberg; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Excursion behaviour of female roe deer may depend on density.

Authors:  A Bocci; V Aiello; S Lovari
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Territoriality and reproductive behaviour of roe deer.

Authors:  P S Bramley
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1970-03

8.  Progesterone and estrogen levels in peripheral plasma of the pregnant and nonpregnant roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).

Authors:  B Hoffmann; D Barth; H Karg
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  No difference between the sexes in fine-scale spatial genetic structure of roe deer.

Authors:  Nadège Bonnot; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Aurélie Coulon; Maxime Galan; Jean-François Cosson; Daniel Delorme; François Klein; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Local density and group size interacts with age and sex to determine direction and rate of social dispersal in a polygynous mammal.

Authors:  Paula H Marjamäki; Adrienne L Contasti; Tim N Coulson; Philip D McLoughlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sex differences in condition dependence of natal dispersal in a large herbivore: dispersal propensity and distance are decoupled.

Authors:  A J M Hewison; J-M Gaillard; N Morellet; F Cagnacci; L Debeffe; B Cargnelutti; B Gehr; M Kröschel; M Heurich; A Coulon; P Kjellander; L Börger; S Focardi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds.

Authors:  Josephine D'Urban Jackson; Natalie Dos Remedios; Kathryn H Maher; Sama Zefania; Susan Haig; Sara Oyler-McCance; Donald Blomqvist; Terry Burke; Michael W Bruford; Tamás Székely; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Breeding behavior of female white-tailed deer relative to conception: Evidence for female mate choice.

Authors:  Jeffery D Sullivan; Stephen S Ditchkoff; Bret A Collier; Charles R Ruth; Joshua B Raglin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Role of breeding and natal movements in lifetime dispersal of a forest-dwelling rodent.

Authors:  Vesa Selonen; Ralf Wistbacka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent.

Authors:  Martin Mayer; Andreas Zedrosser; Frank Rosell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors.

Authors:  R Terry Bowyer; Dale R McCullough; Janet L Rachlow; Simone Ciuti; Jericho C Whiting
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  A novel method for detecting extra-home range movements (EHRMs) by animals and recommendations for future EHRM studies.

Authors:  Todd C Jacobsen; Kevyn H Wiskirchen; Stephen S Ditchkoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.