Literature DB >> 25027139

Telecare collaborative management of chronic pain in primary care: a randomized clinical trial.

Kurt Kroenke1, Erin E Krebs2, Jingwei Wu3, Zhangsheng Yu3, Neale R Chumbler4, Matthew J Bair1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is among the most prevalent, costly, and disabling medical disorders. However, few clinical trials have examined interventions to improve chronic pain in primary care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a telecare intervention for chronic pain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Stepped Care to Optimize Pain Care Effectiveness (SCOPE) study was a randomized trial comparing a telephone-delivered collaborative care management intervention vs usual care in 250 patients with chronic (≥3 months) musculoskeletal pain of at least moderate intensity (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] score ≥5). Patients were enrolled from 5 primary care clinics in a single Veterans Affairs medical center from June 2010 through May 2012, with 12-month follow-up completed by June 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized either to an intervention group (n = 124) or to a usual care group whose members received all pain care as usual from their primary care physicians (n = 126). The intervention group received 12 months of telecare management that coupled automated symptom monitoring with an algorithm-guided stepped care approach to optimizing analgesics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was the BPI total score, which ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine") and for which a 1-point change is considered clinically important. Secondary pain outcomes included BPI interference and severity, global pain improvement, treatment satisfaction, and use of opioids and other analgesics.
RESULTS: Overall, mean (SD) baseline BPI scores in the intervention and control groups were 5.31 (1.81) and 5.12 (1.80), respectively. Compared with usual care, the intervention group had a 1.02-point lower (95% CI, -1.58 to -0.47) BPI score at 12 months (3.57 vs 4.59). Patients in the intervention group were nearly twice as likely to report at least a 30% improvement in their pain score by 12 months (51.7% vs 27.1%; relative risk, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.4 to 2.7]), with a number needed to treat of 4.1 (95% CI, 3.0 to 6.4) for a 30% improvement. Secondary pain outcomes also improved. Few patients in either group required opioid initiation or dose escalation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Telecare collaborative management increased the proportion of primary care patients with improved chronic musculoskeletal pain. This was accomplished by optimizing nonopioid analgesic medications using a stepped care algorithm and monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00926588.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027139     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.7689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  57 in total

1.  Automated Self-management (ASM) vs. ASM-Enhanced Collaborative Care for Chronic Pain and Mood Symptoms: the CAMMPS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Fitsum Baye; Spencer G Lourens; Erica Evans; Sharon Weitlauf; Stephanie McCalley; Brian Porter; Marianne S Matthias; Matthew J Bair
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  [Current capabilities of telemedicine in anaesthesiology].

Authors:  M Czaplik; J Brokmann; N Hochhausen; S K Beckers; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Does telemedicine reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare? A systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Purohit; James Smith; Arthur Hibble
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

4.  The SPADE Symptom Cluster in Primary Care Patients With Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Lorie L Davis; Kurt Kroenke; Patrick Monahan; Jacob Kean; Timothy E Stump
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Patient experience survey in telemedicine for spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  J Yuen; C A Thiyagarajan; M Belci
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Associations between pre-, post-, and peri-operative variables and health resource use following surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Maximiliano Sobrero; Joshua Chen; Tamar Kotz; Eric Genden; Andrew G Sikora; Brett Miles
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  A Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Primary Care Provider Adherence to Chronic Opioid Therapy Guidelines and Reduce Opioid Misuse: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Christopher Shanahan; Victoria Parker; Donna Beers; Ziming Xuan; Orlaith Heymann; Allison Lange; Jane M Liebschutz
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Development and Patient Satisfaction of a New Telemedicine Service for Pain Management at Massachusetts General Hospital to the Island of Martha's Vineyard.

Authors:  George M Hanna; Irina Fishman; David A Edwards; Shiqian Shen; Cheryl Kram; Xulei Liu; Matthew Shotwell; Christopher Gilligan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Joel D Howell; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kathryn M Harms; Noura Bashshur; Charles R Doarn
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.536

10.  Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale: Initial Validation in Three Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Jingwei Wu; Zhangsheng Yu; Matthew J Bair; Jacob Kean; Timothy Stump; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.