George M Hanna1, Irina Fishman2, David A Edwards3, Shiqian Shen4, Cheryl Kram5, Xulei Liu3, Matthew Shotwell3, Christopher Gilligan2. 1. *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts ghanna2@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Pain Management Center, Martha's Vineyard Hospital, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients in remote areas lack access to specialist care and pain management services. In order to provide pain management care to patients remote from our center, we created a telemedicine pain clinic (telepain) at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston, MA to extend services to the Island of Martha's Vineyard. DESIGN: Over 13 months, 238 telepain video clinic evaluations were conducted. A pain physician visited the island 1-2 days per month and performed 121 interventions. Given the novelty of telemedicine clinics, we surveyed patients to gauge satisfaction and identify perceived weaknesses in our approach that could be addressed. Forty-nine consecutive patients answered a 14-question, 5-point balanced Likert-scale survey with 1 (no, definitely not) being most negative and 5 (yes, definitely) being most positive. SETTING: Patients on Martha's Vineyard referred for pain management consultation services via telemedicine. PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine. INTERVENTIONS: Likert-scale survey administered. MEASURES: Questions measured patient impressions of video-based visits with their doctor, convenience of the visit, concerns about privacy, and whether they would recommend such a visit, among other items. RESULTS: Mean respondent scores for each question were >4.3 indicating a favorable impression of the telepain clinic experience. Lowest mean scores were found when respondents were asked to compare the care they received by telepain versus an in-person visit, or whether they were able to develop a friendly relationship with the doctor. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an overall positive reception of telepain by patients, yet highlight the challenge of building a patient-physician relationship remotely.
OBJECTIVE:Patients in remote areas lack access to specialist care and pain management services. In order to provide pain management care to patients remote from our center, we created a telemedicine pain clinic (telepain) at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston, MA to extend services to the Island of Martha's Vineyard. DESIGN: Over 13 months, 238 telepain video clinic evaluations were conducted. A pain physician visited the island 1-2 days per month and performed 121 interventions. Given the novelty of telemedicine clinics, we surveyed patients to gauge satisfaction and identify perceived weaknesses in our approach that could be addressed. Forty-nine consecutive patients answered a 14-question, 5-point balanced Likert-scale survey with 1 (no, definitely not) being most negative and 5 (yes, definitely) being most positive. SETTING:Patients on Martha's Vineyard referred for pain management consultation services via telemedicine. PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine. INTERVENTIONS: Likert-scale survey administered. MEASURES: Questions measured patient impressions of video-based visits with their doctor, convenience of the visit, concerns about privacy, and whether they would recommend such a visit, among other items. RESULTS: Mean respondent scores for each question were >4.3 indicating a favorable impression of the telepain clinic experience. Lowest mean scores were found when respondents were asked to compare the care they received by telepain versus an in-person visit, or whether they were able to develop a friendly relationship with the doctor. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an overall positive reception of telepain by patients, yet highlight the challenge of building a patient-physician relationship remotely.
Authors: Linda H Eaton; Debra B Gordon; Sheryl Wyant; Brian R Theodore; Alexa R Meins; Tessa Rue; Cara Towle; David Tauben; Ardith Z Doorenbos Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ruth E Dubin; John Flannery; Paul Taenzer; Andrew Smith; Karen Smith; Ralph Fabico; Jane Zhao; Lindsay Cameron; Dana Chmelnitsky; Rob Williams; Leslie Carlin; Hannah Sidrak; Sanjeev Arora; Andrea D Furlan Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2015
Authors: Joseph W Frank; Evan P Carey; Katherine M Fagan; David C Aron; Jeff Todd-Stenberg; Brent A Moore; Robert D Kerns; David H Au; P Michael Ho; Susan R Kirsh Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Brian R Theodore; Jan Whittington; Cara Towle; David J Tauben; Barbara Endicott-Popovsky; Alex Cahana; Ardith Z Doorenbos Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Nicholas James Rademacher; Gai Cole; Kevin J Psoter; Gabor Kelen; Jamie Wei Zhi Fan; Dennis Gordon; Junaid Razzak Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: David Anthony Provenzano; B Todd Sitzman; Samuel Ambrose Florentino; Glenn A Buterbaugh Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 6.288