Literature DB >> 25026953

The gradient technique improves success rates in intrauterine insemination cycles of unexplained subfertile couples when compared to swim up technique; a prospective randomized study.

Hatice Karamahmutoglu1, Ahmet Erdem, Mehmet Erdem, Mehmet Firat Mutlu, Nuray Bozkurt, Mesut Oktem, Derya Deniz Ercan, Seyhan Gumuslu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of gradient and swim-up semen preparation techniques on pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with low dose gonadotropin stimulation with the diagnosis of unexplained or mild male subfertility.
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty three couples were randomized into swim up or gradient technique groups for sperm preperation. The clinical and on going pregnancy rates per cycle and per patient were evaluated.
RESULTS: Both clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle were significantly higher in the "gradient" group (19% and 16.9%) in comparision with the "swim up" group (9.7% and 6.9%) (p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy and on-going pregnancy rates per patient were higher in the "gradient" group (26.1% and 23.4%) when compared to the "swim up" group (15.2% and 10.7%), (p < 0.05). In the subgroup of 191 unexplained subfertile couples with 290 cycles; the "gradient" group also revealed significantly higher clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle (21.6% and 17.9%) when compared with the "swim up" group (10.3% and 7.1%) (p < 0.05). In total of 48 treatment cycles upon 32 couples with mild male factor subfertility no significant difference were found between the two sperm preparation techniques in terms of clinical (% 5.3 vs %6.9, p > 0.05) and ongoing (% 5.3 vs %6.9, p > 0.05) pregnancy rates per cycle.
CONCLUSION: The gradient technique significantly improves clinical outcome in IUI cycles of unexplained subfertile couples when compared to swim up technique. In male subfertile patients, both techniques yield similar clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25026953      PMCID: PMC4156944          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0274-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  14 in total

1.  Intra-uterine insemination with prepared sperm vs. unprepared first split ejaculates. A randomized study.

Authors:  M Goldenberg; J Rabinovici; D Bider; B Lunenfeld; J Blankstein; R Weissenberg
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.775

2.  Reduced senescence and retained nuclear DNA integrity in human spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  J M Morrell; O Moffatt; D Sakkas; G C Manicardi; D Bizzaro; M Tomlinson; H Nilsson; P V Holmes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preparation by differential gradient centrifugation is better than swim-up in selecting sperm with normal morphology (strict criteria).

Authors:  P Prakash; L Leykin; Z Chen; T Toth; R Sayegh; I Schiff; K Isaacson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Intrauterine insemination in male subfertility: a comparative study of sperm preparation using a commercial Percoll kit and conventional sperm wash.

Authors:  H Depypere; S Milingos; F Comhaire
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Sperm recovery techniques to maximize fertilizing capacity.

Authors:  D Mortimer
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E G Hughes
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies.

Authors:  D Sakkas; G C Manicardi; M Tomlinson; M Mandrioli; D Bizzaro; P G Bianchi; U Bianchi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Erdem; Songul Atmaca; Umit Korucuoglu; Onur Karabacak
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  W C Dodson; J Moessner; J Miller; R S Legro; C L Gnatuk
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Efficacy and pregnancy outcome of two methods of semen preparation for intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mahmood Morshedi; Hakan E Duran; Steven Taylor; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  10 in total

1.  The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.

Authors:  Yuksel Oguz; Ismail Guler; Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Seyhan Gumuslu; Mesut Oktem; Nuray Bozkurt; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Carolien M Boomsma; Ben J Cohlen; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 3.  Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Erica T Y Leung; Cheuk-Lun Lee; Xinyi Tian; Kevin K W Lam; Raymond H W Li; Ernest H Y Ng; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Fluorescence-Based Ratiometric Analysis of Sperm Centrioles (FRAC) Finds Patient Age and Sperm Morphology Are Associated With Centriole Quality.

Authors:  Katerina A Turner; Emily L Fishman; Mariam Asadullah; Brooke Ott; Patrick Dusza; Tariq A Shah; Puneet Sindhwani; Nagalakshmi Nadiminty; Emanuela Molinari; Pasquale Patrizio; Barbara S Saltzman; Tomer Avidor-Reiss
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-22

5.  Comparison of the effect of different media on the clinical outcomes of the density-gradient centrifugation/swim-up and swim-up methods.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim; Eun-Ha Kim; Eun-Ah Kim; Kyung-Ah Lee; Ji-Eun Shin; Hwang Kwon
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  Comparison of two sperm processing techniques for low complexity assisted fertilization: sperm washing followed by swim-up and discontinuous density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  Cássio L Fácio; Lígia F Previato; Ligiane A Machado-Paula; Paulo Cs Matheus; Edilberto Araújo
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 7.  Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.

Authors:  Iván Oseguera-López; Sara Ruiz-Díaz; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Serafín Pérez-Cerezales
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-11-29

8.  Relationship between sperm parameters and clinical outcomes of Intra Uterine Insemination (IUI).

Authors:  Fatemeh Mohammadi; Zohreh Mehdinia; Samaneh Ghasemi; Zahra Zolfaghari; Fatemeh Sadat Amjadi; Mahnaz Ashrafi; Zahra Zandieh
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2021

Review 9.  Outcome reporting across randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male infertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael P Rimmer; Ruth A Howie; Venkatesh Subramanian; Richard A Anderson; Ricardo Pimenta Bertolla; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Pietro Bortoletto; Sesh K Sunkara; Rod T Mitchell; Allan Pacey; Madelon van Wely; Cindy M Farquhar; James M N Duffy; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-03-04

10.  A comprehensive evaluation of pre- and post-processing sperm parameters for predicting successful pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperms.

Authors:  Yumei Luo; Mingxing Liu; Shunhong Wu; Mimi Zhang; Jingru Yuan; Yufang Zhong; Qing Li; Xiaofang Sun; Xia Xu; Detu Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.105

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.