Literature DB >> 25025827

Optimization of pulse duration and pulse charge during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

G Alon, J Allin, G F Inbar.   

Abstract

The main effects and interaction of pulse duration and pulse charge on sensory, motor and painful stimulation were examined on six male subjects. Surface electrodes were placed over the triceps brachii muscle. Pulse duration was varied between 5 and 1000 µs. Peak current, muscle torque and four excitatory responses were determined. Sequential order of sensory, motor and painful stimulation was evidenced. Selective excitation of these different physiological responses was easier and required less charge as pulse duration became shorter. The greatest non-painful torque was reached at 100 µs pulse duration. The most suitable range for motor stimulation was 20 to 200 µs. For painful stimulation, a 5 to 10 µs duration was favoured. A range of 20 to 100 µs was recommended for sensory stimulation.
Copyright © 1983 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by . All rights reserved.

Year:  1983        PMID: 25025827     DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60670-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise.

Authors:  K Hainaut; J Duchateau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Magnetic field excitation of peripheral nerves and the heart: a comparison of thresholds.

Authors:  J P Reilly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the anterior neck region: The impact of pulse duration and frequency on maximum amplitude tolerance and perceived discomfort.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Giselle Carnaby; Donald Bolser; Ronald Rozensky; Michael Crary
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Dynamic optimization of stimulation frequency to reduce isometric muscle fatigue using a modified Hill-Huxley model.

Authors:  Brian D Doll; Nicholas A Kirsch; Xuefeng Bao; Brad E Dicianno; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Interferential electric stimulation applied to the neck increases swallowing frequency.

Authors:  Takayuki Furuta; Masanori Takemura; Junzo Tsujita; Yoshitaka Oku
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Gary A Dudley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Cutaneous sensation of electrical stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Gavin Hsu; Forouzan Farahani; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Effects of Varying Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Pulse Duration on Swallowing Kinematics in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Alexis L Clark
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Noninvasive spinal stimulation safely enables upright posture in children with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anastasia Keller; Goutam Singh; Joel H Sommerfeld; Molly King; Parth Parikh; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Jessica D'Amico; Yury Gerasimenko; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  Electrically Elicited Force Response Characteristics of Forearm Extensor Muscles for Electrical Muscle Stimulation-Based Haptic Rendering.

Authors:  Jungeun Lee; Yeongjin Kim; Hoeryong Jung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.