Thymidylate is a critical DNA nucleotide that has to be synthesized in cells de novo by all organisms. Flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase (FDTS) catalyzes the final step in this de novo production of thymidylate in many human pathogens, but it is absent from humans. The FDTS reaction proceeds via a chemical route that is different from its human enzyme analogue, making FDTS a potential antimicrobial target. The chemical mechanism of FDTS is still not understood, and the two most recently proposed mechanisms involve reaction intermediates that are unusual in pyrimidine biosynthesis and biology in general. These mechanisms differ in the relative timing of the reaction of the flavin with the substrate. The consequence of this difference is significant: the intermediates are cationic in one case and neutral in the other, an important consideration in the construction of mechanism-based enzyme inhibitors. Here we test these mechanisms via chemical trapping of reaction intermediates, stopped-flow, and substrate hydrogen isotope exchange techniques. Our findings suggest that an initial activation of the pyrimidine substrate by reduced flavin is required for catalysis, and a revised mechanism is proposed on the basis of previous and new data. These findings and the newly proposed mechanism add an important piece to the puzzle of the mechanism of FDTS and suggest a new class of intermediates that, in the future, may serve as targets for mechanism-based design of FDTS-specific inhibitors.
Thymidylate is a critical DNA nucleotide that has to be synthesized in cells de novo by all organisms. Flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase (FDTS) catalyzes the final step in this de novo production of thymidylate in many human pathogens, but it is absent from humans. The FDTS reaction proceeds via a chemical route that is different from its human enzyme analogue, making FDTS a potential antimicrobial target. The chemical mechanism of FDTS is still not understood, and the two most recently proposed mechanisms involve reaction intermediates that are unusual in pyrimidine biosynthesis and biology in general. These mechanisms differ in the relative timing of the reaction of the flavin with the substrate. The consequence of this difference is significant: the intermediates are cationic in one case and neutral in the other, an important consideration in the construction of mechanism-based enzyme inhibitors. Here we test these mechanisms via chemical trapping of reaction intermediates, stopped-flow, and substrate hydrogen isotope exchange techniques. Our findings suggest that an initial activation of the pyrimidine substrate by reduced flavin is required for catalysis, and a revised mechanism is proposed on the basis of previous and new data. These findings and the newly proposed mechanism add an important piece to the puzzle of the mechanism of FDTS and suggest a new class of intermediates that, in the future, may serve as targets for mechanism-based design of FDTS-specific inhibitors.
Thymidylate
(2′-deoxythymidine-5′-monophosphate,
or dTMP), an important DNA precursor, can be either scavenged by cells
from thymidine in the environment, via thymidine kinase-catalyzed
phosphorylation, or generated in cells de novo. The
last committed step in the intracellular de novo biosynthesis
of dTMP is catalyzed by the enzyme thymidylate synthase (TSase). TSase
is encoded by thyA gene in eukaryotes and TYMS gene in mammals, while in many pathogenic bacteria
and viruses this protein is the product of a completely different
gene, thyX.[1−3] TSase enzymes realize two chemical
transformations: substitution of the C5 hydrogen of substrate 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-monophosphate
(dUMP) with the methylene from the N5,N10-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate (CH2H4fol) cofactor, and reduction of the transferred
methylene by a hydride to form the C5 methyl of the product dTMP (Scheme 1). The thyA-encoded TSase uses
CH2H4fol as a source of both the methylene and
the reducing hydride.[4,5] In thyX-encoded
TSase, on the other hand, the hydride is supplied by the reduced flavin
adenine dinucleotide prosthetic group (FADH2).[6,7] Furthermore, the thyA- and thyX-encoded TSases share no sequence or structural resemblance and have
been shown to catalyze dUMP→dTMP conversion by completely
different chemical mechanisms.[8] This structural
and mechanistic divergence of the two enzymes provides an attractive
direction for the design of drugs tailored to microbial thymidylate
biosynthesis.
Scheme 1
Proposed Chemical
Mechanisms for FDTS
Adapted with permission
from
ref (11). R = 2′-deoxyribose-5′-phosphate;
R′ = (p-aminobenzoyl)glutamate; R″
= adenosine-5′-pyrophosphate-ribityl.
The catalytic mechanism of thyA-encoded classical
TSase enzymes has been studied for many years. In the chemical mechanism
of classical TSase,[4,5] the enzyme activates dUMP for
subsequent reaction via a nucleophilic attack at C6 of the uracil
by an active-site cysteine. This mechanistic feature is conserved
in all thyA-encoded TSases, as well as in other uracil-methylating
enzymes (e.g., rRNA- and tRNA-methyltransferases),[8] and has been exploited by chemotherapeutic drugs targeting
TSase (e.g., 5-fluorouracil).[9] In contrast
to thyA-encoded TSase, flavin-dependent TSase (FDTS)
bypasses the need for an active-site nucleophile.[10] Instead, FDTS has been proposed to accomplish substrate
activation by either direct FADH2 reduction of dUMP to
form reactive enolate (step 1 in Scheme 1a)
or polarization of the uracil moiety in the active site to make the
C5 nucleophilic (resonance form of dUMP in Scheme 1b).[11] The possibility that the
N5 of FADH2 nucleophilically activates dUMP has been eliminated
by the observation that 5-deaza-FAD-FDTS is still active.[10] As described below, hydrogen isotope exchange
on dUMP supports substrate activation by the reduced flavin (Scheme 1a). However, the deuteration of the substrate and
product but not the trapped intermediate in FDTS reactions in D2O cannot be explained by either of the mechanisms in Scheme 1; thus an alternative proposal is called for.Direct hydride transfer from the N5 of reduced flavin to dUMP (Scheme 1a) was proposed to initiate the reaction based on
the deuterium incorporation at C6 of dTMP, in the reactions of Thermatoga maritima FDTS in D2O conducted at
sub-physiological temperatures.[10] In all
FDTS crystal structures in complex with both FAD and dUMP, the N5
of FAD is indeed in close proximity of the C6 of dUMP (ca. 3.4 Å),
consistent with the postulated direct hydride transfer from the flavin.
This chemistry is unusual in thymidylate biosynthesis and uridine
methylation in general, but it is not without precedent in enzymology.
For example, direct hydride addition from reduced flavin to an equivalent
position of α,β-unsaturated substrates similar to dUMP
occurs in reactions catalyzed by the old-yellow enzyme[12] and dihydroorotate dehydrogenase.[13] In the proposed mechanism in Scheme 1a, substrate reduction by FADH2 (i.e.,
flavin oxidation) takes place prior to the methylene
transfer; consequently, the reaction intermediates along this path
are reduced and non-aromatic in nature.
Proposed Chemical
Mechanisms for FDTS
Adapted with permission
from
ref (11). R = 2′-deoxyribose-5′-phosphate;
R′ = (p-aminobenzoyl)glutamate; R″
= adenosine-5′-pyrophosphate-ribityl.In an alternative mechanism (Scheme 1b),
dUMP is activated for the reaction with CH2H4fol via electronic polarization of the uracil moiety in the enzyme’s
active site upon binding. This dUMP polarization was proposed as the
initial step on the basis of the disappearance of dUMP in a single-turnover
experiment occurring before flavin oxidation (ref (11) and the green trace in
Figure 1). To the best of our knowledge, no
such addition of formaldehyde and/or Mannich amines (analogous to
iminium CH2H4fol) to the C5 of uracil has been
observed before without the aid of a nucleophile, either in enzymes
or in solution; nevertheless, such chemistry does not violate any
obvious chemical rules. Following elimination of H4fol
from the dUMP-folate adduct (step 3 in Scheme 1b), a positively charged exocyclic methylene intermediate would be
obtained. This intermediate could then be reduced by FADH2 at C6 to yield the same isomer proposed in Scheme 1a, accounting for the observed D6 in the product dTMP.[10] In such a mechanism, flavin oxidation happens after the methylene transfer; as a consequence, the reaction
intermediates are not reduced, in sharp contrast to the mechanism
in Scheme 1a.
Figure 1
Single-turnover
FDTS reaction kinetics overlaid with stopped-flow
flavin absorbance trace (green, this work). Reduced flavin (FADH2) has no 420 nm absorbance, while oxidized flavin (FAD) does.
Adapted with permission from ref (11).
Single-turnover
FDTS reaction kinetics overlaid with stopped-flow
flavin absorbance trace (green, this work). Reduced flavin (FADH2) has no 420 nm absorbance, while oxidized flavin (FAD) does.
Adapted with permission from ref (11).Recently, we isolated and characterized a derivative of an
intermediate(s)
in FDTS-catalyzed thymidylate synthesis, in rapid acid-quenching experiments
conducted at room temperature.[11] This trapped
species (5-hydroxymethyl-dUMP, or 5-HM-dUMP, Scheme 2) already contains the methylene of CH2H4fol. 5-HM-dUMP is consistent with either of the two proposed mechanisms
for FDTS (Scheme 1) and does not distinguish
between them. In the current work, in an attempt to differentiate
between the mechanisms, we repeated acid-quenching experiments with
FDTS reactions taking place in deuterated water (D2O).
The reaction conditions were kept the same as in the quenching studies
in H2O,[11] except all reactants
and buffers were exchanged into D2O by cycles of lyophilization
and resuspension in heavy water (99.9% D). In D2O, all
exchangeable hydrogens, including the N5 hydrogen of the reduced flavin
to be transferred to the uracil moiety, are exchanged with their heavier
isotopes. Thus, we anticipated that, if the hydride from the flavin
is transferred to dUMP before the methylene (Scheme 1a), then a portion of acid-trapped 5-HM-dUMP would be deuterated,
i.e., one mass unit heavier than in the reactions conducted in H2O (Scheme 2a). On the other hand, on
the basis of the mechanism proposed in Scheme 1b, no effect on the mass of the trapped intermediate was expected
(Scheme 2b). As shown in Figure 2, no deuterium enrichment is observed in 5-HM-dUMP isolated
in the D2O experiment. Importantly, all dTMP product present
in D2O reactions was singly deuterated, eliminating the
possibility of protium contamination in the experiment and in accordance
with previously reported deuterium incorporation into dTMP.[10]
Scheme 2
Acid Trapping of the Proposed Intermediates
in the Reaction with
Deuterium-Labeled Flavin (FADD2)
Formation
of 5-HM-dUMP in (a)
requires oxidation of the reduced intermediates at C6, i.e., loss
of a hydron (H+ or D+) and two electrons. Due
to an isotope effect on this nonenzymatic oxidation, the majority
of 5-HM-dUMP is expected to be deuterated. Molecular oxygen has been
proposed as the oxidant,[11] since quenched
reactions are exposed to oxygen during quenching.
Figure 2
HRMS of
5-hydroxymethyl-dUMP isolated from the acid-quenched FDTS
reactions in H2O and D2O.
Acid Trapping of the Proposed Intermediates
in the Reaction with
Deuterium-Labeled Flavin (FADD2)
Formation
of 5-HM-dUMP in (a)
requires oxidation of the reduced intermediates at C6, i.e., loss
of a hydron (H+ or D+) and two electrons. Due
to an isotope effect on this nonenzymatic oxidation, the majority
of 5-HM-dUMP is expected to be deuterated. Molecular oxygen has been
proposed as the oxidant,[11] since quenched
reactions are exposed to oxygen during quenching.HRMS of
5-hydroxymethyl-dUMP isolated from the acid-quenched FDTS
reactions in H2O and D2O.The above observation appears to support the mechanism suggested
in Scheme 1b; however, while analyzing acid-quenched
FDTS reactions conducted in D2O by MS, we noticed that
a significant portion (>60%) of unreacted substrate, dUMP, was
singly
deuterated (Figure 3b). Much longer incubations
of the same reaction mixture with the oxidized FDTS yielded no trace
of deuterated dUMP (Figure 3c). This observation
is inconsistent with the polarization mechanism in Scheme 1b, which does not require reduced flavin. In stark
contrast to classical TSase-catalyzed H/D exchange at C5 of dUMP,
which is strongly dependent on CH2H4folate,[14] the dUMP in FDTS reactions is deuterated to
the same extent whether CH2H4folate is present
or absent, depending only on the flavin being reduced (Figure 3c). The location of the incorporated deuterium was
confirmed to be the C5 of uracil by the following series of observations:
(i) incubation of reduced enzyme with 5D-dUMP in H2O resulted
in loss of the deuterium label (Figure S1b); (ii) tritium of [5-3H]-dUMP was released into water
upon incubation with reduced FDTS (Figure S2e) but not with oxidized FDTS or without the enzyme; and (iii) in
the same experiment with [6-3H]-dUMP, all of the tritium
remained on dUMP (Figure S2b), indicating
that the reduced enzyme catalyzes the exchange of the C5 hydrogen
and not that of C6. The choice of the reducing agent (sodium dithionite
vs NADPH) had no effect on the observed dUMP deuteration (Figure 3b,d), ruling against dithionite decomposition products
(e.g., thiosulfate)[15] as uracil activators.
The exchange on C5 of uracil generally requires Michael addition at
C6 (Scheme S1), as demonstrated with a
variety of nucleophiles in solution (see Supporting
Information for references). Altogether, the above observations
and controls are in line with the H/D exchange at C5 of dUMP being
catalyzed by the attack of hydride from the enzyme-bound FADH2 on the C6 of dUMP, as proposed in step 1 of Scheme 1a. The possibility that substrate H/D exchange is
enabled by a significant conformational change in FDTS upon reduction
is not supported by any of the current crystal structures of FDTSs
from several organisms and with various ligands and mutations, but
it cannot be positively excluded.
Figure 3
ESI-MS spectra of dUMP incubated in D2O with dithionite
(a), dithionite-reduced FDTS (b), oxidized FDTS (c), and NADPH-reduced
FDTS (d). All spectra were collected in the negative-ion mode.
ESI-MS spectra of dUMP incubated in D2O with dithionite
(a), dithionite-reduced FDTS (b), oxidized FDTS (c), and NADPH-reduced
FDTS (d). All spectra were collected in the negative-ion mode.Neither of the mechanisms in Scheme 1 can
explain all of the findings described in this work. Specifically:
when incubating the mixture in D2O, deuteration of the
substrate dUMP at C5 occurs only with reduced enzyme-bound flavin;
in D2O, the product dTMP is mono-deuterated at either C6
or C7, yet the acid-trapped intermediate is not deuterated, and the
flavin is still reduced as this intermediate is trapped (Figure 1). A new mechanism is proposed in Scheme 3 that reconciles these seemingly contradictory observations.
By this mechanism the H/D exchange at C5 of dUMP in D2O
(after step 1) requires the flavin to be reduced, as observed experimentally
(Figure 3). A reversible stereospecific hydride
transfer from N5 of the reduced flavin to C6 of the uracil moiety,
similar to the one proposed in Scheme 3 (steps
1 and 3), has been observed before in dihydrouridine synthase[16,17] and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.[18] If steps 1–3 are fast and occur within the dead-time of the
flow experiments (2 ms), this would also be in accordance with the
presence of the methylene in the earliest intermediate trapped.[11] We attempted to detect the presumed initial
intermediate that follows the first hydride transfer from the flavin
(step 1 in Scheme 3) using the substrate dUMP
with and without the unreactive CH2H4folate
analogue, folinic acid (see Supporting Information for experimental details and results). That step is reversible,
and if at equilibrium a significant amount of oxidized flavin were
to accumulate, its detection would have supported the mechanism in
Scheme 3. As no oxidation of FADH2 was detected, this attempt cannot support or rule out the proposed
mechanism. The unusual intermediates between steps 3 and 5 accumulate
and are trapped by the acid in the quench-flow experiment.[11] Step 5 (or 4b) seems to occur ∼20 s before
step 6, in accordance with the delay observed between the stopped-flow
kinetics and the formation of dTMP product (Figure 1). Because the oxidized FAD is formed only transiently and
does not accumulate kinetically, the flavin is expected to appear
spectrally reduced, in agreement with the stopped-flow kinetics in
Figure 1. Finally, the intermediates forming
between steps 3 and 5 would contain no deuterium in D2O
and could readily undergo hydroxyl addition at the methylene carbon
to yield non-deuterated 5-hydroxymethyl-dUMP observed in acid-quenched
FDTS reactions (Figure 2). It is noteworthy
that the bridged intermediate between steps 3 and 4 has recently been
suggested by QM/MM calculations in classical thymidylate synthase.[19]
Scheme 3
Proposed Alternative Mechanism for FDTS
That Agrees with Both Current
and Past Findings
The hypothesis is that steps
1–3 occur within the dead-time of the flow experiments (2 ms),
and that intermediates between steps 3 and 5 accumulate and are trapped
by the acid in the quench-flow experiment.[11] At this time it is not clear if the elimination of H4fol precedes the hydride transfer from the flavin (step 4a) or is
concerted with it (the green arrows in step 4b). Note that FAD prosthetic
group remains bound to the enzyme throughout the catalytic cycle,
although its isoalloxazine ring fluctuates toward and away from the
substrate as described in ref (21).
Proposed Alternative Mechanism for FDTS
That Agrees with Both Current
and Past Findings
The hypothesis is that steps
1–3 occur within the dead-time of the flow experiments (2 ms),
and that intermediates between steps 3 and 5 accumulate and are trapped
by the acid in the quench-flow experiment.[11] At this time it is not clear if the elimination of H4fol precedes the hydride transfer from the flavin (step 4a) or is
concerted with it (the green arrows in step 4b). Note that FAD prosthetic
group remains bound to the enzyme throughout the catalytic cycle,
although its isoalloxazine ring fluctuates toward and away from the
substrate as described in ref (21).FDTS is a promising antibiotic
drug target because, while it is
absent in humans, it is present in ∼30% of all microorganisms,
several of which are severe human pathogens. For example, all Rickettsia rely solely on FDTS for thymidylate, and the
essentiality of FDTS has been recently illustrated in M. tuberculosis.[20] FDTS is the only known uracil-methylating
enzyme that does not employ an enzymatic nucleophile for uridylate
activation,[8] thus presenting a unique target
for small-molecule inhibition. The current study sheds new light on
the complex mechanism of the reaction catalyzed by this enzyme. Further
investigation of the proposed mechanistic features is underway to
build the platform for mechanism-based design of FDTS inhibitors.
The mechanism proposed here is unique to FDTS, which lends confidence
in high specificity of such inhibitors.
Authors: Damien Leduc; Sébastien Graziani; Gerard Lipowski; Christophe Marchand; Pierre Le Maréchal; Ursula Liebl; Hannu Myllykallio Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Frederick W Stull; Steffen M Bernard; Aparna Sapra; Janet L Smith; Erik R P Zuiderweg; Bruce A Palfey Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Tatiana V Mishanina; Liping Yu; Kalani Karunaratne; Dibyendu Mondal; John M Corcoran; Michael A Choi; Amnon Kohen Journal: Science Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Charles Bou-Nader; Frederick W Stull; Ludovic Pecqueur; Philippe Simon; Vincent Guérineau; Antoine Royant; Marc Fontecave; Murielle Lombard; Bruce A Palfey; Djemel Hamdane Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Yan-Jiun Lee; Nan Dai; Stephanie I Müller; Chudi Guan; Mackenzie J Parker; Morgan E Fraser; Shannon E Walsh; Janani Sridar; Andrew Mulholland; Krutika Nayak; Zhiyi Sun; Yu-Cheng Lin; Donald G Comb; Katherine Marks; Reyaz Gonzalez; Daniel P Dowling; Vahe Bandarian; Lana Saleh; Ivan R Corrêa; Peter R Weigele Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 16.971