Literature DB >> 25025225

Detecting novel genetic variants associated with isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Sandhya Shekar1, Zhen Xuan Yeo1, Joshua C L Wong1, Maurice K L Chan1, Danny C T Ong1, Pumipat Tongyoo1, Sin-Yew Wong2, Ann S G Lee3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Isoniazid (INH) is a highly effective antibiotic central for the treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). INH-resistant MTB clinical isolates are frequently mutated in the katG gene and the inhA promoter region, but 10 to 37% of INH-resistant clinical isolates have no detectable alterations in currently known gene targets associated with INH-resistance. We aimed to identify novel genes associated with INH-resistance in these latter isolates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: INH-resistant clinical isolates of MTB were pre-screened for mutations in the katG, inhA, kasA and ndh genes and the regulatory regions of inhA and ahpC. Twelve INH-resistant isolates with no mutations, and 17 INH-susceptible MTB isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing. Phylogenetically related variants and synonymous mutations were excluded and further analysis revealed mutations in 60 genes and 4 intergenic regions associated with INH-resistance. Sanger sequencing verification of 45 genes confirmed that mutations in 40 genes were observed only in INH-resistant isolates and not in INH-susceptible isolates. The ratios of non-synonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS ratio) for the INH-resistance associated mutations identified in this study were 1.234 for INH-resistant and 0.654 for INH-susceptible isolates, strongly suggesting that these mutations are indeed associated with INH-resistance.
CONCLUSION: The discovery of novel targets associated with INH-resistance described in this study may potentially be important for the development of improved molecular detection strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25025225      PMCID: PMC4099304          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is a leading cause of mortality globally, with about 8.7 million new cases of tuberculosis and 1.4 million deaths reported in 2011 [1], with the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis further hampering the control of the disease. Drug resistance in MTB develops when random naturally occurring chromosomal mutations occur in genes encoding a drug target or a drug-activating enzyme, and the subsequent selection of these mutants when there is incomplete suppression of growth, typically when patients have poor adherence to the therapeutic regimen. It has been estimated that in 2011, there were 630,000 cases of MDR TB [1], defined as strains of TB that are resistant to isoniazid (INH) and rifampin. INH is a highly effective anti-tuberculosis drug, central for the treatment of MTB. The mode of action of INH is to inhibit mycolic acid synthesis [2]. The complex cell envelope of MTB protects the bacterium from antibiotics, oxidative stress and toxic macromolecules, and is composed of a plasma membrane at the base, and a thick outer layer that includes complex lipids such as mycolic acid and phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) [3]–[5]. INH is a prodrug activated by the catalase-peroxidase enzyme, KatG [6]. The majority of resistance-associated mutations occur in the katG gene, with mutations resulting in diminished activation of INH [6]. Other important resistance-conferring mutations are promoter or structural mutations in inhA, ahpC, kasA and ndh [7]–[11]. However, many of the mutations detected in these genes have been also observed in INH-susceptible isolates and/or in association with katG mutations [2], [12]–[16]. Between 10 to 37% of INH-resistant clinical isolates have no detectable alterations in any of the currently known gene targets [7], [15], [16], suggesting that there are other loci involved in INH resistance that have yet to be identified. To date, none of the studies that performed genome sequencing on drug-resistant MTB have focussed on INH resistance [17]–[20]. Our aim was to identify novel genes associated with INH resistance by sequencing the whole genomes of INH-resistant clinical isolates of MTB with no detectable mutations in the known genes associated with INH resistance, and to validate the identified candidate genes in an independent set of MTB strains. Several novel genes associated with INH resistance are described.

Materials and Methods

MTB Isolates and DNA Extraction

Clinical isolates of MTB were from the Central Tuberculosis Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital. Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing was done with the BACTEC 460 system (Becton Dickinson, Towson, MD), as previously described [14]. The BACTEC system is a well recognised method for susceptibility testing, and uses radiometric technology for the rapid, qualitative detection of mycobacterial growth in the presence of isoniazid, tested at a concentration of 0.1 ug/ml. DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen slants by heat-inactivation, digestion with lysozyme and proteinase K, followed by precipitation of the nucleic acids, as described previously [21], [22].

Whole-Genome Sequencing

All INH-resistant isolates had previously been screened for known mutations found in katG, inhA, kasA, ndh genes, and the regulatory regions of inhA and ahpC, and had no detectable mutations [7], [14], [23]. Whole-genome sequencing was done in two stages. In the first stage, DNA from 12 INH-resistant and 6 INH-susceptible isolates was sequenced on the Applied Biosystems SOLiD 3 plus system by Mission Biotech Co., Ltd. Taiwan and AITBIOTECH Pte Ltd., Singapore. However, preliminary Sanger sequencing analysis showed that many of the mutations detected in INH-resistant isolates were also found in INH-susceptible isolates (data not shown). In the second stage, DNA from 11 additional INH-susceptible isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing to facilitate the selection of INH-resistant specific mutations, and these were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2000 Sequencing System by 1st Base Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Mapping Assembly and Mutation Detection

SOLiD 3 single-end reads and Illumina paired-end reads were aligned against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (GenBank accession no. AL123456.2) using BWA 0.5.9, which takes into account read quality during alignment, resulting in low quality reads not being aligned [24]. Mutations were detected using GATK (version 1.3-24-gc8b1c92), whereby the BAM alignment file was pre-processed by local realignment and de-duplication [25]. Subsequently, variant calling was performed using UnifiedGenotyper and VariantFiltration from GATK against the pre-processed BAM file. Mutations detected in all isolates with <50% allele frequency were filtered. Only mutations that were specific to INH-resistant isolates were selected for subsequent analyses. Some INH-resistant specific mutations could be incorrectly detected if coverage in susceptible isolates is low (less than 4×), thus only mutations with ≥4× coverage (at the mutation site) in at least one susceptible isolate were retained. ANNOVAR was used to annotate mutations by gene name, mutation type and genomic features [26].

Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetically related mutations could affect the accuracy in selecting the INH resistance associated genes and intergenic regions. Phylogenetic analysis of 29 isolates that were whole genome sequenced was carried out using TreeBeST, which uses a maximum likelihood approach for phylogenetic tree construction. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic tree constructed with Mycobacterium canetti as an outlier [27].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of 29 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.

The whole genome sequences of the 29 isolates were used to construct the tree, with Mycobacterium canetti used as an outlier, in order to identify and eliminate mutations that were phylogenetically related. Drug-resistant isolates were coded according to the drugs they were resistant to: isolates resistant to isoniazid were coded with “I”; those resistant to rifampicin, “R”; those resistant to streptomycin, “S”; those resistant to ethambutol, “E”. All isolates coded with 5-digit numbers (2XXXX), were INH-susceptible isolates. Spoligotyping assigned the isolates into these lineages: I64, S41, S16, I74, R7, I88, I100, I47, IR2, IE7 and IR12 belonged to the Beijing lineage; 26258, 25155, 23733, I37 and 27793, the U lineage; 27809, 27288, I21, I39, S19, 24362, 25594 and 28249, the T lineage; S12, the Haarlem lineage; I60, the LAM lineage; 28905, the H37Rv lineage; and the isolates S11 and 20250, the EAI lineage.

Phylogenetic tree of 29 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.

The whole genome sequences of the 29 isolates were used to construct the tree, with Mycobacterium canetti used as an outlier, in order to identify and eliminate mutations that were phylogenetically related. Drug-resistant isolates were coded according to the drugs they were resistant to: isolates resistant to isoniazid were coded with “I”; those resistant to rifampicin, “R”; those resistant to streptomycin, “S”; those resistant to ethambutol, “E”. All isolates coded with 5-digit numbers (2XXXX), were INH-susceptible isolates. Spoligotyping assigned the isolates into these lineages: I64, S41, S16, I74, R7, I88, I100, I47, IR2, IE7 and IR12 belonged to the Beijing lineage; 26258, 25155, 23733, I37 and 27793, the U lineage; 27809, 27288, I21, I39, S19, 24362, 25594 and 28249, the T lineage; S12, the Haarlem lineage; I60, the LAM lineage; 28905, the H37Rv lineage; and the isolates S11 and 20250, the EAI lineage. Filtering of phylogenetically related mutations was performed in the following way, as has been described previously in [17]: mutations that were present only within one single clade of the tree (Figure 1) were removed; mutations that were present in two or more subclades (Figure 1) and in which there was an INH-susceptible isolate, were removed. The remaining set of 4229 variants was used to identify INH- resistance associated genes and intergenic regions.

Identification of INH resistance associated mutations within coding regions and intergenic regions

Mutations associated with INH-resistance were identified using the approach described previously by Zhang et al. [17]. In brief, the Poisson distribution (p<0.05) was used to identify mutations in coding and intergenic regions, not occurring by chance. The Normal distribution (p<0.05) was used to select mutations that were present in a higher proportion in INH-resistant isolates than in INH-susceptible isolates (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Flowchart showing the steps used for identifying INH-resistance associated genes and intergenic regions.

The whole genome sequences of 29 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were aligned with the reference genome H37Rv (GenBank accession no. AL123456.2) and mutations in the sequences were identified. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out to eliminate phylogenetically related mutations. The Poisson and Normal distributions were used to identify mutations associated with INH-resistance.

Flowchart showing the steps used for identifying INH-resistance associated genes and intergenic regions.

The whole genome sequences of 29 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were aligned with the reference genome H37Rv (GenBank accession no. AL123456.2) and mutations in the sequences were identified. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out to eliminate phylogenetically related mutations. The Poisson and Normal distributions were used to identify mutations associated with INH-resistance.

dN/dS Calculation

To confirm our findings, the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS ratio) of the INH-resistance associated genes as well as whole genome sequences of both INH-resistance and INH-susceptible isolates was determined [28]. The ancestral sequences for the dN/dS ratio calculation was found using PAML [29]. The dN/dS ratio was calculated using the KaKs Calculator [30].

Sanger Sequencing

Specific primers were designed to amplify regions of ∼300 to 600 base pairs flanking mutations detected from whole-genome sequencing (Table S1). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed using HotStar Taq polymerase (Qiagen, USA) and the PCR products were purified with FastAP (Fermentas, Canada) and Exonuclease I enzyme (Fermentas), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sanger sequencing was performed using the standard dye terminator chemistry (BigDye Terminator v3.1, Applied Biosystems, USA), and analysed on a 3130xl Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing results were aligned to the MTB H37Rv sequence (GenBank accession no. AL123456) using SeqMan Pro Lasergene 8 software (DNASTAR, Wisconsin, USA).

Data Access

Raw sequence data has been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/) under accession number ERP001993.

Results

Mutations detected by Whole-Genome Sequencing

To identify INH-resistance specific mutations, we performed whole-genome sequencing for twelve INH-resistant MTB isolates (n = 12) with no detectable mutations in the inhA, kasA and ndh genes, codon 315 of katG and the promoter regions of inhA and ahpC. Nine of these twelve INH-resistant isolates were mono-resistant to INH. Whole-genome sequencing of 17 INH-susceptible isolates was also done to allow for the discrimination of resistance-associated mutations (Table S2). The average depth of coverage for the twelve INH-resistant MTB isolates was 33-fold (19- to 41-fold), with an average of 86% of bases with at least 8-fold coverage. For the 17 INH-susceptible MTB isolates, the average depth of coverage was 534-fold, and an average of 94% bases had at least 8-fold coverage. As whole-genome sequencing had been performed using two sequencing platforms, the 11 INH-susceptible isolates sequenced in the second stage had higher read coverage, as the more advanced Illumina HiSeq2000 Sequencing System was utilized. The overall higher coverage for INH-susceptible MTB isolates resulted in a higher specificity in detecting INH-resistant specific mutations. In total, we detected 8087 mutations of which 1054 were found only in INH-resistant strains (Table 1). Of these 1054 mutations, 289 were synonymous, 565 were non-synonymous, 9 were nonsense, and 65 were insertions or deletions. Thus, a total of 639 non-synonymous and nonsense mutations, insertions and deletions were identified in INH-resistant strains (Table S2).
Table 1

Variants identified by whole genome sequencing of 12 isoniazid-resistant and 17 isoniazid-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.

Mutation typeResistant and Susceptible isolates* Resistant isolates onlySusceptible isolates only
All (n = 8087) 1949 1054 5084
Coding 1669 928 4392
 Synonymous5732891552
 Nonsynonymous9775652397
 Nonsense14957
 Insertions/Deletions10565386
Non-coding (intergenic) 280 126 692

* Variants that can be found in both isoniazid-resistant and -susceptible isolates.

* Variants that can be found in both isoniazid-resistant and -susceptible isolates.

Genes and intergenic regions associated with INH resistance

A total of 2,365 non-synonymous and 144 intergenic variants were identified in INH-resistant and INH-susceptible strains, after excluding phylogenetically related and synonymous mutations (Figure 2). We further excluded potential random and non-resistance specific variations (Figure 2). This resulted in 61 non-synonymous mutations in 60 genes (Tables 2, S3 and S4) and 4 intergenic variations (Tables 2, Tables S5 and S6) selected as candidates associated with INH-resistance.
Table 2

Genes and intergenic regions potentially associated with INH-resistance in M. tuberculosis.

Gene NameRv No.Functional Category* Function*
- Rv0175 Cell wall and cell processesUnknown
- Rv0236c Cell wall and cell processesBiosynthesis of the mycobacterial Cell wall
pstS2 Rv0932c Cell wall and cell processesActive transport of inorganic phosphate across the membrane; required for binding-protein-mediated phosphate transport
mscL Rv0985c Cell wall and cell processesRegulation of osmotic pressure changes within the cell
- Rv0987 Cell wall and cell processesActive transport of adhesion component across the membrane; translocation of the substrate across the membrane
esxL Rv1198 Cell wall and cell processesUnknown
- Rv1362c Cell wall and cell processesUnknown
- Rv1877 Cell wall and cell processesUnknown; possibly involved in transport of drug across the membrane.
- Rv2576c Cell wall and cell processesUnknown
- Rv2869c Cell wall and cell processesControls membrane composition
dacB2 Rv2911 Cell wall and cell processesPeptidoglycan synthesis
lppY Rv2999 Cell wall and cell processesUnknown
lytB1 Rv3382c Cell wall and cell processesUnknown; possibly involved in drug/antibiotic tolerance
- Rv3448 Cell wall and cell processesUnknown; possibly involved in transport across the membrane
- Rv0194 Cell wall and cell processesActive transport of drugs across the membrane; energy coupling to the transport system and for the translocation of the substrate across the membrane
hycQ Rv0086 Metabolism and respirationInvolved in hydrogen metabolism
- Rv0338c Metabolism and respirationUnknown; probably involved in cellular metabolism
- Rv0517 Metabolism and respirationUnknown; probably involved in cellular metabolism
- Rv0793 Metabolism and respirationUnknown
fprB Rv0886 Metabolism and respirationElectron transfer protein
eno Rv1023 Metabolism and respirationGlycolysis
moeY Rv1355c Metabolism and respirationBiosynthesis of a demolybdo cofactor (molybdopterin), necessary for molybdoenzymes; activation of the small subunit of the molybdopterin converting factor (MOAD)
frdD Rv1555 Metabolism and respirationInterconversion of fumarate and succinate
gnd1 Rv1844c Metabolism and respirationInvolved in hexose monophosphate shunt
ureC Rv1850 Metabolism and respirationConversion of urea to NH3
- Rv2296 Metabolism and respirationConverts haloalkanes to corresponding alcohol and halides
pca Rv2967c Metabolism and respirationGluconeogenesis and lipogenesis
atsB Rv3299c Metabolism and respirationSulfate and phenol generation from phenol sulfate
- Rv3401 Metabolism and respirationUnknown; probably enzyme involved in cellular metabolism.
- Rv3537 Metabolism and respirationProbably involved in cellular metabolism; predicted to be involved in lipid catabolism
- Rv0104 Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv0574c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv1069c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv1118c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv1504c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv1896c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv1977 Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv2184c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv2432c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv2917 Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv2955c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
- Rv3181c Hypothetical proteinUnknown
fadE1 Rv0131c Lipid metabolismUnknown; but involved in lipid degradation
gpsA Rv0564c Lipid metabolismPhospholipid biosynthesis
- Rv0726c Lipid metabolismPossible methyltransferase
pks5 Rv1527c Lipid metabolismPolyketide metabolism
- Rv1729c Lipid metabolismPossible methyltransferase
mbtB Rv2383c Lipid metabolismBiogenesis of the hydroxyphenyloxazoline-containing siderophore mycobactins
mbtA Rv2384 Lipid metabolismBiogenesis of the hydroxyphenyloxazoline-containing siderophore mycobactins
cmaA1 Rv3392c Lipid metabolismCyclopropane function
- Rv3480c Lipid metabolismMay be involved in synthesis of triacylglycerol
rpoB Rv0667 Information pathwaysCatalyzes the transcription of DNA into RNA
sigI Rv1189 Information pathwaysPromotes attachment of the RNA polymerase to specific initiation sites
- Rv3649 Information pathwaysHelicase activity
PPE8 Rv0355c PE/PPE# Unknown
PE_PGRS7 Rv0578c PE/PPE# Unknown
PPE24 Rv1753c PE/PPE# Unknown
- Rv0094c Insertion seqs and phagesUnknown
- Rv2659c Insertion seqs and phagesIntegration of a phage into the host genome by site-specific recombination
- Rv1358 Regulatory proteinsInvolved in transcriptional mechanism
- Rv0835-Rv0836c --
- Rv1068c-Rv1069c --
- Rv3812-Rv3813c --
- Rv3822-Rv3823c --

* Functional Category and Functions of genes are retrieved from Tuberculist [39] (http://tuberculist.epfl.ch/).

Proteins whose N-termini contain the characteristic motifs Pro-Glu (PE) or Pro-Pro-Glu (PPE).

Intergenic regions.

* Functional Category and Functions of genes are retrieved from Tuberculist [39] (http://tuberculist.epfl.ch/). Proteins whose N-termini contain the characteristic motifs Pro-Glu (PE) or Pro-Pro-Glu (PPE). Intergenic regions.

dN/dS ratios

Table 3 shows the dN/dS ratio for INH-resistant and INH-susceptible isolates for the whole genome and for the 60 genes associated with INH resistance identified in this study. The dN/dS ratios for INH-resistant and INH-susceptible isolates were 1.234 and 0.654 respectively for the 60 genes associated with INH resistance.
Table 3

The ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS) in INH-resistant (n = 12) and INH-susceptible (n = 17) isolates, in (1) whole genome sequences and in (2) 60 INH-resistance associated genes.

INH-resistant isolatesINH-susceptible isolates
Whole Genome0.7940.766
60 genes1.2340.654

INH-resistant mutations verified by Sanger sequencing

To determine if the mutations identified from whole genome sequencing occurred only in INH-resistant isolates and not in INH-susceptible isolates, verification was done on additional INH-resistant and INH-susceptible isolates by Sanger sequencing. For each mutation, the number of isolates used for verification by Sanger sequencing is shown in Supplementary Table S7. Importantly, the majority of these mutations were detected in additional INH-resistant isolates (column J, Table S7), suggesting that these could be high-confidence mutations. Of the 45 genes screened for mutations, only 5 (gpsA, gnd1, atsB, Rv1069c and Rv2869c) had mutations in INH-susceptible isolates (Table S7). A list of all the INH-resistant and INH-susceptible isolates used for verification is provided in Table S8.

Discussion

This is the first study to our knowledge that has whole-genome sequenced INH-resistant isolates with no mutations in known regions associated with INH resistance. Although there are several recent reports in the literature on MTB genomes, these studies did not sequence MTB isolates pre-screened for mutations in INH-resistance associated genes [17]–[20], [31]–[35]. Recently, two landmark studies employed genome sequencing of M. tuberculosis to identify genes and intergenic regions associated with drug resistance, but did not focus on INH resistance. Zhang et al. [17] performed genome sequencing on multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates, while Farhat and colleagues [20] sequenced a combination of epidemiologically linked, non-epidemiologically linked, drug-resistant and drug-sensitive MTB isolates. Our work described here is thus novel. In particular the unique approach used, i.e. the pre-screening of M. tuberculosis isolates to select isolates with no detectable alterations in known INH resistance genes, has resulted in the identification of several novel genes and intergenic regions associated with INH-resistance. Of the 60 genes identified as INH-resistance associated, 12 were hypothetical proteins of unknown functions, 15 had annotated functions in cell wall and cell processes, 15 were associated with metabolism and respiration, and 9 were genes involved in lipid metabolism. This current study and two recent ones have identified members of the polyketide synthase family in drug-resistant MTB isolates [17], [20]. Polyketide synthases are involved in complex lipid biosynthesis and assembly [5]. The pks5 gene is a mas-like polyketide synthase gene; MTB with pks5 mutants introduced into the lungs of mice had lower rates of multiplication as compared to wild-type strains [36]. Hence mutations in pks genes may be associated with INH-resistance and further functional validation is warranted. Mutations within intergenic regions such as the regulatory (promoter) regions of inhA and ahpC are associated with INH-resistance. Recent genome sequencing of M. tuberculosis have identified additional drug resistance-associated intergenic regions [17], [20]. For example, the newly discovered intergenic regions, thyA-Rv2765 and thyX-hsdS.1, were shown to increase the levels of gene expression of flanking genes as compared to non-mutant controls in vitro, providing functional evidence that these regions may be important in drug resistance [17]. The ratio of non-synonymous mutations to synonymous mutations (dN/dS) suggests the rate of evolution of genes and such rates play a major role in identifying potential drug targets [37]. In the case of positive selection, genes with dN/dS ratio >1 have adapted themselves such that they become fit to reproduce themselves against drugs that act on them. This current work has identified genes that have dN/dS ratio of 1.234 in INH-resistant isolates, in contrast to a dN/dS ratio of 0.654 in INH-susceptible isolates, strongly suggesting that mutations in these genes are indeed associated with INH-resistance. One limitation of this study is that the small number of isolates that were whole-genome sequenced (12 INH-resistant and 17 INH-susceptible isolates) may have led to the identification of only some INH-resistant mutations, which occur in very low frequencies. It is anticipated that whole genome sequencing of more MTB isolates could potentially reveal additional novel mutations associated with INH-resistance. In addition, due to the limited number of clinical isolates in this study, statistical confirmation that the INH-resistance associated mutations are indeed linked to the INH-resistant phenotype, has not been shown. Another limitation of this study is that cloning of each mutant allele and determination of their functional effect in INH resistance has not been performed. Functional analysis will be required to conclusively show that each of these mutations is associated with INH resistance. Allelic exchange has also been proposed as an approach for validating the effect of mutations associated with antibiotic resistance [38]. However this approach will involve the culture of MTB in BSL-3 laboratories. In conclusion, the search for identification of the additional genes associated with INH-resistance as described in this current study, will be important for the development of comprehensive molecular detection strategies, more efficient than current susceptibility testing methods based on culture. Such molecular screening methods could aid in more appropriate treatment given earlier to patients and have the potential to decrease transmission of the resistant strains. In addition, the discovery of the new loci reported here may reveal novel targets suitable for the development of alternative therapeutic options. List of primers used for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of nonsynonymous and nonsense mutations, insertions and deletions identified by whole genome sequencing in INH-resistant isolates. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of nonsynonymous, stoploss and stopgain mutations with Poisson distribution p-value<0.05. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of nonsynonymous, stoploss and stopgain mutations with Normal distribution p-value<0.05. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of intergenic mutations with Poisson distribution p-value<0.05. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of intergenic mutations with Normal distribution p-value<0.05. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. List of mutations verified using Sanger sequencing. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. Drug susceptibility of 101 INH-resistant isolates & 99 INH-susceptible isolates tested. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  Mutations in extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis that do not code for known drug-resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  Alifiya S Motiwala; Yang Dai; Edward C Jones-López; Soo-Hee Hwang; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Nae Cho; Laura E Via; Clifton E Barry; David Alland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Allelic exchange and mutant selection demonstrate that common clinical embCAB gene mutations only modestly increase resistance to ethambutol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Hassan Safi; Robert D Fleischmann; Scott N Peterson; Marcus B Jones; Behnam Jarrahi; David Alland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Polyketide versatility in the biosynthesis of complex mycobacterial cell wall lipids.

Authors:  Tarun Chopra; Rajesh S Gokhale
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Rapid detection of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by high-resolution melting analysis.

Authors:  Danny C T Ong; Wing-Cheong Yam; Gilman K H Siu; Ann S G Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The non-clonality of drug resistance in Beijing-genotype isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the Western Cape of South Africa.

Authors:  Thomas R Ioerger; Yicheng Feng; Xiaohua Chen; Karen M Dobos; Thomas C Victor; Elizabeth M Streicher; Robin M Warren; Nicolaas C Gey van Pittius; Paul D Van Helden; James C Sacchettini
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Genomic diversity among drug sensitive and multidrug resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with identical DNA fingerprints.

Authors:  Stefan Niemann; Claudio U Köser; Sebastien Gagneux; Claudia Plinke; Susanne Homolka; Helen Bignell; Richard J Carter; R Keira Cheetham; Anthony Cox; Niall A Gormley; Paula Kokko-Gonzales; Lisa J Murray; Roberto Rigatti; Vincent P Smith; Felix P M Arends; Helen S Cox; Geoff Smith; John A C Archer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genome analysis of multi- and extensively-drug-resistant tuberculosis from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Thomas R Ioerger; Sunwoo Koo; Eun-Gyu No; Xiaohua Chen; Michelle H Larsen; William R Jacobs; Manormoney Pillay; A Willem Sturm; James C Sacchettini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography.

Authors:  Ruth Hershberg; Mikhail Lipatov; Peter M Small; Hadar Sheffer; Stefan Niemann; Susanne Homolka; Jared C Roach; Kristin Kremer; Dmitri A Petrov; Marcus W Feldman; Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering Within-Host Microevolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through Whole-Genome Sequencing: the Phenotypic Impact and Way Forward.

Authors:  A Van Rie; R M Warren; S D Ley; M de Vos
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Redefining MTBDRplus test results: what do indeterminate results actually mean?

Authors:  C Nikam; R Patel; M Sadani; K Ajbani; M Kazi; R Soman; A Shetty; S B Georghiou; T C Rodwell; A Catanzaro; C Rodrigues
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Significance of the coexistence of non-codon 315 katG, inhA, and oxyR-ahpC intergenic gene mutations among isoniazid-resistant and multidrug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a report of novel mutations.

Authors:  Fatemeh Norouzi; Sharareh Moghim; ShimaSadat Farzaneh; Hossein Fazeli; Mahshid Salehi; Bahram Nasr Esfahani
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.735

4.  Deciphering the virulence factors of the opportunistic pathogen Mycobacterium colombiense.

Authors:  M N Gonzalez-Perez; M I Murcia; C Parra-Lopez; J Blom; A Tauch
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2016-09-10

5.  Signatures of Selection at Drug Resistance Loci in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Tatum D Mortimer; Alexandra M Weber; Caitlin S Pepperell
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 6.496

6.  Immuno Nanosensor for the Ultrasensitive Naked Eye Detection of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Noremylia Mohd Bakhori; Nor Azah Yusof; Jaafar Abdullah; Helmi Wasoh; Siti Suraiya Md Noor; Nurul Hanun Ahmad Raston; Faruq Mohammad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A novel Ancestral Beijing sublineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis suggests the transition site to Modern Beijing sublineages.

Authors:  Pravech Ajawatanawong; Hideki Yanai; Nat Smittipat; Areeya Disratthakit; Norio Yamada; Reiko Miyahara; Supalert Nedsuwan; Worarat Imasanguan; Pacharee Kantipong; Boonchai Chaiyasirinroje; Jiraporn Wongyai; Supada Plitphonganphim; Pornpen Tantivitayakul; Jody Phelan; Julian Parkhill; Taane G Clark; Martin L Hibberd; Wuthiwat Ruangchai; Panawun Palittapongarnpim; Tada Juthayothin; Yuttapong Thawornwattana; Wasna Viratyosin; Sissades Tongsima; Surakameth Mahasirimongkol; Katsushi Tokunaga; Prasit Palittapongarnpim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.