Literature DB >> 25024760

Impact of homecare electronic health record on timeliness of clinical documentation, reimbursement, and patient outcomes.

P S Sockolow1, K H Bowles2, M C Adelsberger3, J L Chittams2, C Liao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Homecare is an important and effective way of managing chronic illnesses using skilled nursing care in the home. Unlike hospitals and ambulatory settings, clinicians visit patients at home at different times, independent of each other. Twenty-nine percent of 10,000 homecare agencies in the United States have adopted point-of-care EHRs. Yet, relatively little is known about the growing use of homecare EHRs.
OBJECTIVE: Researchers compared workflow, financial billing, and patient outcomes before and after implementation to evaluate the impact of a homecare point-of-care EHR.
METHODS: The design was a pre/post observational study embedded in a mixed methods study. The setting was a Philadelphia-based homecare agency with 137 clinicians. Data sources included: (1) clinician EHR documentation completion; (2) EHR usage data; (3) Medicare billing data; (4) an EHR Nurse Satisfaction survey; (5) clinician observations; (6) clinician interviews; and (7) patient outcomes.
RESULTS: Clinicians were satisfied with documentation timeliness and team communication. Following EHR implementation, 90% of notes were completed within the 1-day compliance interval (n = 56,702) compared with 30% of notes completed within the 7-day compliance interval in the pre-implementation period (n = 14,563; OR 19, p <. 001). Productivity in the number of clinical notes documented post-implementation increased almost 10-fold compared to pre-implementation. Days to Medicare claims fell from 100 days pre-implementation to 30 days post-implementation, while the census rose. EHR implementation impact on patient outcomes was limited to some behavioral outcomes. DISCUSSION: Findings from this homecare EHR study indicated clinician EHR use enabled a sustained increase in productivity of note completion, as well as timeliness of documentation and billing for reimbursement with limited impact on improving patient outcomes. As EHR adoption increases to better meet the needs of the growing population of older people with chronic health conditions, these results can inform homecare EHR development and implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation studies; aged; clinical information systems; homecare; patient care team; technology evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024760      PMCID: PMC4081747          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  15 in total

Review 1.  The use of electronic health information systems in home care: facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Paul Stolee; Brandie Steeves; Christine Glenny; Stephanie Filsinger
Journal:  Home Healthc Nurse       Date:  2010-03

2.  Initial home health outcomes under prospective payment.

Authors:  Robert E Schlenker; Martha C Powell; Glenn K Goodrich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

Authors:  E Ammenwerth; N de Keizer
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Complexity in geriatric home healthcare.

Authors:  Christopher Murtaugh; Timothy Peng; Annette Totten; Beth Costello; Stanley Moore; Hakan Aykan
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

5.  A new instrument for measuring clinician satisfaction with electronic health records.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Jonathan P Weiner; Kathryn H Bowles; Harold P Lehmann
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Challenges and facilitators to adoption of a point-of-care electronic health record in home care.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Kathryn H Bowles; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Jesse L Chittams; Cindy Liao
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2014

7.  Improving patient outcomes of home health care: findings from two demonstration trials of outcome-based quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter W Shaughnessy; David F Hittle; Kathryn S Crisler; Martha C Powell; Angela A Richard; Andrew M Kramer; Robert E Schlenker; John F Steiner; Nancy S Donelan-McCall; James M Beaudry; Kendra L Mulvey-Lawlor; Karen Engle
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Advice for Decision Makers Based on an Electronic Health Record Evaluation at a Program for All-inclusive Care for Elders Site.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; J P Weiner; K H Bowles; P Abbott; H P Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  EHR safety: the way forward to safe and effective systems.

Authors:  James M Walker; Pascale Carayon; Nancy Leveson; Ronald A Paulus; John Tooker; Homer Chin; Albert Bothe; Walter F Stewart
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Ashly D Black; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Chantelle Anandan; Kathrin Cresswell; Tomislav Bokun; Brian McKinstry; Rob Procter; Azeem Majeed; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  17 in total

1.  Improving Bridging from Informatics Theory to Practice.

Authors:  R Haux; S Koch
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Using Cognitive Load Theory to Improve Posthospitalization Follow-Up Visits.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Harry; Grace H Shin; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Gennady M Gorbovitsky; David W Bates; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Data Visualization of Home Care Admission Nurses' Decision-Making.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Yushi Yang; Ellen J Bass; Kathryn H Bowles; Annika Holmberg; Potashnik Sheryl
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Assessing Commercially Available Personal Health Records for Home Health: Recommendations for Design.

Authors:  Laura Kneale; Yong Choi; George Demiris
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Home health nurse decision-making regarding visit intensity planning for newly admitted patients: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Elliane Irani; Karen B Hirschman; Pamela Z Cacchione; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Based Real Time Remote Health Monitoring Systems: A Review on Patients Prioritization and Related "Big Data" Using Body Sensors information and Communication Technology.

Authors:  Naser Kalid; A A Zaidan; B B Zaidan; Omar H Salman; M Hashim; H Muzammil
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  How Does Managed Care Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Care Among Medicare-Insured Minority Women?

Authors:  Julie Smith-Gagen; Travis Loux; Chris Drake; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-10-21

Review 8.  Real-Time Remote Health-Monitoring Systems in a Medical Centre: A Review of the Provision of Healthcare Services-Based Body Sensor Information, Open Challenges and Methodological Aspects.

Authors:  O S Albahri; A A Zaidan; B B Zaidan; M Hashim; A S Albahri; M A Alsalem
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 9.  Real-Time Fault-Tolerant mHealth System: Comprehensive Review of Healthcare Services, Opens Issues, Challenges and Methodological Aspects.

Authors:  A S Albahri; A A Zaidan; O S Albahri; B B Zaidan; M A Alsalem
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Leveraging electronic health records to improve management of noncommunicable diseases at primary healthcare centres in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ahmed Hazazi; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.