Literature DB >> 27294748

How Does Managed Care Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Care Among Medicare-Insured Minority Women?

Julie Smith-Gagen1, Travis Loux2, Chris Drake3, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate if evidence-based clinical guidelines are implemented equitability among ethnic minority breast cancer patients using Medicare Advantage and investigate if presumed advantages of managed care over fee-for-service are greater for minorities than for Whites.
METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare were used to examine 70,755 women over age 65 diagnosed with early stage breast cancer between 2005 and 2009. Implementation of two clinical guidelines was assessed: receipt of radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery and estrogen receptor status documentation. Multilevel logistic regression and inverse propensity weighting controlled for confounding.
RESULTS: African Americans are still less likely than Whites to receive radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery, whether they use Medicare fee-for-service (OR 95 % CI) = 0.90 (0.83, 0.98) or managed care (OR 95 % CI) = 0.87 (0.76, 1.00). Differences between receipt of radiation therapy by insurance plan type was nonexistent. Relative to FFS, the use of managed care improved the odds of having estrogen receptor status documented by 44 % in African Americans, (OR 95 % CI) = 1.44 (1.15, 1.83) and by 42 % in Latina patients (OR 95 % CI) = 1.42 (1.17, 1.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Medicare fee-for-service, ethnic and racial disparities among Medicare Advantage users were reduced. We observed fewer disparities, but not an elimination of disparities, among Medicare Advantage enrollees receiving breast cancer care with an organizational and patient component of care. This suggests managed care may still need to focus on minority patient empowerment and involvement in care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Disparities; Medicare managed care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27294748     DOI: 10.1007/s40615-015-0167-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities        ISSN: 2196-8837


  57 in total

1.  Understanding biased selection in Medicare HMOs.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Sally C Stearns; Edward C Norton; Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of homecare electronic health record on timeliness of clinical documentation, reimbursement, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; K H Bowles; M C Adelsberger; J L Chittams; C Liao
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.

Authors:  Susanne Stampf; Erika Graf; Claudia Schmoor; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.

Authors:  Travis M Loux; Christiana Drake; Julie Smith-Gagen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer C Livaudais; Dawn L Hershman; Laurel Habel; Lawrence Kushi; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Christopher I Li; Alfred I Neugut; Louis Fehrenbacher; Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: an HMO and fee-for-service comparison.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; C N Klabunde; J L Warren; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  An investigation into the social context of low-income, urban Black and Latina women: implications for adherence to recommended health behaviors.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Roberta E Goldman; Karen M Emmons; Glorian Sorensen; Jennifer D Allen
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-08-19

8.  Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.

Authors:  Valerie S Harder; Elizabeth A Stuart; James C Anthony
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-09

9.  Insurance policies and perceived quality of primary care among privately insured patients: do features of managed care widen the racial, ethnic, and language-based gaps?

Authors:  Irena Stepanikova; Karen S Cook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.