Literature DB >> 15778794

An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

E Ammenwerth1, N de Keizer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into historical perspective of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic review on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care from 1982 to 2002.
METHODS: The inventory is based on a systematic literature search in PubMed. Abstracts were included when they described an evaluation study of a computer-based component in health care. We identified 1035 papers from 1982 to 2002 and indexed them based on a multi-axial classification describing type of information system, study location, evaluation strategy, evaluation methods, evaluation setting, and evaluation focus. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: We found interesting developments in evaluation research in the last 20 years. For example, there has been a strong shift from medical journals to medical informatics journals. With regard to methods, explanatory research and quantitative methods have dominated evaluation studies in the last 20 years. Since 1982, the number of lab studies and technical evaluation studies has declined, while the number of studies focusing on the influence of information technology on quality of care processes or outcome of patient care has increased. We interpret this shift as a sign of maturation of evaluation research in medical informatics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15778794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  25 in total

Review 1.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Improving Bridging from Informatics Theory to Practice.

Authors:  R Haux; S Koch
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  The effects and quality of IT evaluation studies: Trends in 1982 - 2002.

Authors:  Nicolette de Keizer; Elske Ammenwerth
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review.

Authors:  David Dorr; Laura M Bonner; Amy N Cohen; Rebecca S Shoai; Ruth Perrin; Edmund Chaney; Alexander S Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Maqui Ortiz; Kevin J Anstrom; David R Crosslin; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  A viewpoint on evidence-based health informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Nicolette de Keizer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: a literature review.

Authors:  Bahlol Rahimi; Vivian Vimarlund
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Confronting and resolving an ethical dilemma associated with a practice based evaluation using observational methodology of health information technology.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; H A Taylor
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Advice for Decision Makers Based on an Electronic Health Record Evaluation at a Program for All-inclusive Care for Elders Site.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; J P Weiner; K H Bowles; P Abbott; H P Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Use of Headings and Classifications by Physicians in Medical Narratives of EHRs: An evaluation study in a Finnish hospital.

Authors:  K Häyrinen; K Harno; P Nykänen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.