Literature DB >> 25024208

Friendship and natural selection.

Nicholas A Christakis1, James H Fowler2.   

Abstract

More than any other species, humans form social ties to individuals who are neither kin nor mates, and these ties tend to be with similar people. Here, we show that this similarity extends to genotypes. Across the whole genome, friends' genotypes at the single nucleotide polymorphism level tend to be positively correlated (homophilic). In fact, the increase in similarity relative to strangers is at the level of fourth cousins. However, certain genotypes are also negatively correlated (heterophilic) in friends. And the degree of correlation in genotypes can be used to create a "friendship score" that predicts the existence of friendship ties in a hold-out sample. A focused gene-set analysis indicates that some of the overall correlation in genotypes can be explained by specific systems; for example, an olfactory gene set is homophilic and an immune system gene set is heterophilic, suggesting that these systems may play a role in the formation or maintenance of friendship ties. Friends may be a kind of "functional kin." Finally, homophilic genotypes exhibit significantly higher measures of positive selection, suggesting that, on average, they may yield a synergistic fitness advantage that has been helping to drive recent human evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetics; kinship detection; social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024208      PMCID: PMC4113922          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400825111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Genetic similarity shared by best friends among adolescents.

Authors:  Guang Guo
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Across-line SNP association study for direct and associative effects on feather damage in laying hens.

Authors:  F Biscarini; H Bovenhuis; J van der Poel; T B Rodenburg; A P Jungerius; J A M van Arendonk
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond.

Authors:  Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Positive natural selection in the human lineage.

Authors:  P C Sabeti; S F Schaffner; B Fry; J Lohmueller; P Varilly; O Shamovsky; A Palma; T S Mikkelsen; D Altshuler; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The architecture of human kin detection.

Authors:  Debra Lieberman; John Tooby; Leda Cosmides
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  Glenn E Weisfeld; Tiffany Czilli; Krista A Phillips; James A Gall; Cary M Lichtman
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-07

9.  Evidence of abundant purifying selection in humans for recently acquired regulatory functions.

Authors:  Lucas D Ward; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe; James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  34 in total

1.  Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Parent and peer influences on emerging adult substance use disorder: A genetically informed study.

Authors:  Kaitlin Bountress; Laurie Chassin; Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2016-01-12

3.  In the light of evolution VIII: Darwinian thinking in the social sciences. Introduction.

Authors:  Brian Skyrms; John C Avise; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Social connectedness is associated with fibrinogen level in a human social network.

Authors:  David A Kim; Emelia J Benjamin; James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evaluating reproductive decisions as discrete choices under social influence.

Authors:  R Alexander Bentley; William A Brock; Camila C S Caiado; Michael J O'Brien
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.

Authors:  Jacob A Jezovit; Rebecca Rooke; Jonathan Schneider; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Individual olfactory perception reveals meaningful nonolfactory genetic information.

Authors:  Lavi Secundo; Kobi Snitz; Kineret Weissler; Liron Pinchover; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Ron Loewenthal; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Idan Frumin; Dana Bar-Zvi; Sagit Shushan; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Depressive Symptomology as a Moderator of Friend Selection and Influence on Substance Use Involvement: Estimates from Grades 6 to 12 in Six Longitudinal School-Based Social Networks.

Authors:  Susan T Ennett; Robert W Faris; Andrea M Hussong; Nisha Gottfredson; Veronica Cole
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2018-08-16

Review 9.  The neuroethology of friendship.

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent; Steve W C Chang; Jean-François Gariépy; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Most Likely to Succeed: Long-Run Returns to Adolescent Popularity.

Authors:  Ying Shi; James Moody
Journal:  Soc Curr       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.