Literature DB >> 26100865

Individual olfactory perception reveals meaningful nonolfactory genetic information.

Lavi Secundo1, Kobi Snitz2, Kineret Weissler2, Liron Pinchover2, Yehuda Shoenfeld3, Ron Loewenthal4, Nancy Agmon-Levin3, Idan Frumin2, Dana Bar-Zvi2, Sagit Shushan2, Noam Sobel1.   

Abstract

Each person expresses a potentially unique subset of ∼ 400 different olfactory receptor subtypes. Given that the receptors we express partially determine the odors we smell, it follows that each person may have a unique nose; to capture this, we devised a sensitive test of olfactory perception we termed the "olfactory fingerprint." Olfactory fingerprints relied on matrices of perceived odorant similarity derived from descriptors applied to the odorants. We initially fingerprinted 89 individuals using 28 odors and 54 descriptors. We found that each person had a unique olfactory fingerprint (P < 10(-10)), which was odor specific but descriptor independent. We could identify individuals from this pool using randomly selected sets of 7 odors and 11 descriptors alone. Extrapolating from this data, we determined that using 34 odors and 35 descriptors we could individually identify each of the 7 billion people on earth. Olfactory perception, however, fluctuates over time, calling into question our proposed perceptual readout of presumably stable genetic makeup. To test whether fingerprints remain informative despite this temporal fluctuation, building on the linkage between olfactory receptors and HLA, we hypothesized that olfactory perception may relate to HLA. We obtained olfactory fingerprints and HLA typing for 130 individuals, and found that olfactory fingerprint matching using only four odorants was significantly related to HLA matching (P < 10(-4)), such that olfactory fingerprints can save 32% of HLA tests in a population screen (P < 10(-6)). In conclusion, a precise measure of olfactory perception reveals meaningful nonolfactory genetic information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HLA; MHC; autoimmunity; olfactory genetics; olfactory perception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100865      PMCID: PMC4507195          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424826112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  The molecular receptive range of an odorant receptor.

Authors:  R C Araneda; A D Kini; S Firestein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Quantification of odor quality.

Authors:  P M Wise; M J Olsson; W S Cain
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity: olfactory epithelium is implicated.

Authors:  K K Yee; C J Wysocki
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-04

4.  Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism.

Authors:  T B Reusch; M A Häberli; P B Aeschlimann; M Milinski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor.

Authors:  Suma Jacob; Martha K McClintock; Bethanne Zelano; Carole Ober
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Characterization of clustered MHC-linked olfactory receptor genes in human and mouse.

Authors:  R M Younger; C Amadou; G Bethel; A Ehlers; K F Lindahl; S Forbes; R Horton; S Milne; A J Mungall; J Trowsdale; A Volz; A Ziegler; S Beck
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Population differences in the human functional olfactory repertoire.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Different noses for different people.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Orna Man; Doron Lancet; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A synthetic sandalwood odorant induces wound-healing processes in human keratinocytes via the olfactory receptor OR2AT4.

Authors:  Daniela Busse; Philipp Kudella; Nana-Maria Grüning; Günter Gisselmann; Sonja Ständer; Thomas Luger; Frank Jacobsen; Lars Steinsträßer; Ralf Paus; Paraskevi Gkogkolou; Markus Böhm; Hanns Hatt; Heike Benecke
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Possible roles for products of polymorphic MHC and linked olfactory receptor genes during selection processes in reproduction.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Gotrfried Dohr; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.886

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth.

Authors:  John P McGann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Consequences of undetected olfactory loss for human chemosensory communication and well-being.

Authors:  A Oleszkiewicz; F Kunkel; M Larsson; T Hummel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A behavioral paradigm for measuring perceptual distances in mice.

Authors:  Hirofumi Nakayama; Richard C Gerkin; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  A 3D transcriptomics atlas of the mouse nose sheds light on the anatomical logic of smell.

Authors:  Mayra L Ruiz Tejada Segura; Eman Abou Moussa; Elisa Garabello; Thiago S Nakahara; Melanie Makhlouf; Lisa S Mathew; Li Wang; Filippo Valle; Susie S Y Huang; Joel D Mainland; Michele Caselle; Matteo Osella; Stephan Lorenz; Johannes Reisert; Darren W Logan; Bettina Malnic; Antonio Scialdone; Luis R Saraiva
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Assessment of Olfactory Function in MAPT-Associated Neurodegenerative Disease Reveals Odor-Identification Irreproducibility as a Non-Disease-Specific, General Characteristic of Olfactory Dysfunction.

Authors:  Katerina Markopoulou; Bruce A Chase; Piotr Robowski; Audrey Strongosky; Ewa Narożańska; Emilia J Sitek; Mariusz Berdynski; Maria Barcikowska; Matt C Baker; Rosa Rademakers; Jarosław Sławek; Christine Klein; Katja Hückelheim; Meike Kasten; Zbigniew K Wszolek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  SmellSpace: An Odor-Based Social Network as a Platform for Collecting Olfactory Perceptual Data.

Authors:  Kobi Snitz; Ofer Perl; Danielle Honigstein; Lavi Secundo; Aharon Ravia; Adi Yablonka; Yaara Endevelt-Shapira; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Do all mice smell the same? Chemosensory cues from inbred and wild mouse strains elicit stereotypic sensory representations in the accessory olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Rohini Bansal; Maximilian Nagel; Romana Stopkova; Yizhak Sofer; Tali Kimchi; Pavel Stopka; Marc Spehr; Yoram Ben-Shaul
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Olfactory phenotypic expression unveils human aging.

Authors:  Andrea Mazzatenta; Alessandro Cellerino; Nicola Origlia; Davide Barloscio; Ferdinando Sartucci; Camillo Di Giulio; Luciano Domenici
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12

9.  Variation in olfactory neuron repertoires is genetically controlled and environmentally modulated.

Authors:  Ximena Ibarra-Soria; Thiago S Nakahara; Jingtao Lilue; Yue Jiang; Casey Trimmer; Mateus Aa Souza; Paulo Hm Netto; Kentaro Ikegami; Nicolle R Murphy; Mairi Kusma; Andrea Kirton; Luis R Saraiva; Thomas M Keane; Hiroaki Matsunami; Joel Mainland; Fabio Papes; Darren W Logan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Genetic gateways to COVID-19 infection: Implications for risk, severity, and outcomes.

Authors:  Monojit Debnath; Moinak Banerjee; Michael Berk
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.