Literature DB >> 27022081

Evaluating reproductive decisions as discrete choices under social influence.

R Alexander Bentley1, William A Brock2, Camila C S Caiado3, Michael J O'Brien4.   

Abstract

Discrete choice, coupled with social influence, plays a significant role in evolutionary studies of human fertility, as investigators explore how and why reproductive decisions are made. We have previously proposed that the relative magnitude of social influence can be compared against the transparency of pay-off, also known as the transparency of a decision, through a heuristic diagram that maps decision-making along two axes. The horizontal axis represents the degree to which an agent makes a decision individually versus one that is socially influenced, and the vertical axis represents the degree to which there is transparency in the pay-offs and risks associated with the decision the agent makes. Having previously parametrized the functions that underlie the diagram, we detail here how our estimation methods can be applied to real-world datasets concerning sexual health and contraception.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bangladesh; contraception; discrete choice; fertility; sexual health; social influence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27022081      PMCID: PMC4822434          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  32 in total

1.  Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Christos C Ioannou; Güven Demirel; Thilo Gross; Colin J Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Larissa Conradt; Simon A Levin; Naomi E Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Friendship and natural selection.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cooperating with the future.

Authors:  Oliver P Hauser; David G Rand; Alexander Peysakhovich; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Jens Krause; Darren P Croft; Alexander D M Wilson; Max Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  On the nature of cultural transmission networks: evidence from Fijian villages for adaptive learning biases.

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; James Broesch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation.

Authors:  Robert Boyd; Peter J Richerson; Joseph Henrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

8.  Evidence for evolution in response to natural selection in a contemporary human population.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Francine M Mayer; Daniel H Nussey; Mireille Boisvert; Fanie Pelletier; Denis Réale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Applying evolutionary anthropology.

Authors:  Mhairi A Gibson; David W Lawson
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

10.  Social network analysis shows direct evidence for social transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Catherine Hobaiter; Timothée Poisot; Klaus Zuberbühler; William Hoppitt; Thibaud Gruber
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography?

Authors:  Rebecca Sear; David W Lawson; Hillard Kaplan; Mary K Shenk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Self-serving incentives impair collective decisions by increasing conformity.

Authors:  Sepideh Bazazi; Jorina von Zimmermann; Bahador Bahrami; Daniel Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.