PURPOSE: Despite their efficacy, LVADs remain associated with serious complications. The relationship between haemodynamic changes during support and outcome remains inadequately characterised. This association was investigated in LVAD recipients undergoing prolonged support. METHODS: Forty patients receiving LVAD therapy for >2 years were reviewed retrospectively (mean support duration was 38.62 ± 15.28). Pre- and on-LVAD haemodynamic data were assessed in three groups: (1) those receiving ongoing support (n = 24); (2) those who underwent cardiac transplantation (n = 4); (3) those who died during support (n = 12). RESULTS: For group 1 and 2, LVAD support achieved a decrease in mean PAP, mean PCWP, TPG, and PVR and an increase in thermodilution blood flow (TBF) with significance at ≤5% level. For group 3, there were non-significant changes in TPG and PVR at the 5% level but for mean PAP, mean PCWP, and TBF the changes were similar to Groups 1 and 2 with significance at ≤5% level. Aggregated data from all three groups showed a 58% increase in TBF on LVAD support. CONCLUSION: Highly significant and favourable haemodynamic changes were found. However, group 3 did not undergo decrease in TPG and PVR possibly because of suboptimal LVAD flow, right heart dysfunction and unavoidable prolongation of support.
PURPOSE: Despite their efficacy, LVADs remain associated with serious complications. The relationship between haemodynamic changes during support and outcome remains inadequately characterised. This association was investigated in LVAD recipients undergoing prolonged support. METHODS: Forty patients receiving LVAD therapy for >2 years were reviewed retrospectively (mean support duration was 38.62 ± 15.28). Pre- and on-LVAD haemodynamic data were assessed in three groups: (1) those receiving ongoing support (n = 24); (2) those who underwent cardiac transplantation (n = 4); (3) those who died during support (n = 12). RESULTS: For group 1 and 2, LVAD support achieved a decrease in mean PAP, mean PCWP, TPG, and PVR and an increase in thermodilution blood flow (TBF) with significance at ≤5% level. For group 3, there were non-significant changes in TPG and PVR at the 5% level but for mean PAP, mean PCWP, and TBF the changes were similar to Groups 1 and 2 with significance at ≤5% level. Aggregated data from all three groups showed a 58% increase in TBF on LVAD support. CONCLUSION: Highly significant and favourable haemodynamic changes were found. However, group 3 did not undergo decrease in TPG and PVR possibly because of suboptimal LVAD flow, right heart dysfunction and unavoidable prolongation of support.
Authors: Stephen Westaby; Adrian Banning; Desley Neil; Philip Poole-Wilson; O Howard Frazier Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Elisa Mikus; Alexander Stepanenko; Thomas Krabatsch; Antonio Loforte; Michael Dandel; Hans Brendan Lehmkuhl; Roland Hetzer; Evgenij V Potapov Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2011-02-26 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Akan Emin; Chris A Rogers; Jayan Parameshwar; Guy Macgowan; Rhiannon Taylor; Nizar Yonan; Andre Simon; Steven Tsui; Stephan Schueler; Nicholas R Banner Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 10.247