Literature DB >> 23901056

Trends in long-term mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure in the UK.

Akan Emin1, Chris A Rogers, Jayan Parameshwar, Guy Macgowan, Rhiannon Taylor, Nizar Yonan, Andre Simon, Steven Tsui, Stephan Schueler, Nicholas R Banner.   

Abstract

AIMS: Heart transplantation (HTx) is limited by the scarcity of suitable donor hearts. Consequently, more patients with advanced heart failure require a ventricular assist device (VAD). We report U.K. activity, trends, and outcome for long-term VAD support as a bridging therapy to HTx. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients were grouped into three eras: E1, February 2004-March 2006; E2, April 2006-March 2009; and E3, April 2009-March 2011. Exclusions were patients who received isolated short-term support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation without prior or subsequent long-term VAD support. A total of 247 patients received VAD support; 202 left ventricular (LVAD) support alone and 45 both left and right ventricular support. Activity increased over time, from 36 patients implanted in E1 to 123 in E3. Overall, 46 patients received a first-generation device, 80 a second-generation device, and 121 a third-generation device. Use of third-generation devices increased from <6% in E1 to 78% in E3. Median duration of LVAD support increased from 141 days in E1 to 578 days in E3 (P < 0.001). Overall survival to 1 year after LVAD implant rose from 58.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 40.7-72.4%] in E1 to 72.5% (95% CI 63.3-79.8%) in E3 (P = 0.21), and improved significantly with device generation; at 1 year, 50% of patients with first-generation devices were alive compared with 68.1% and 76.9% of patients with second- and third-generation devices, respectively (P = 0.002). These differences remained after risk adjustment. HTx following LVAD implant reduced over time (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: VAD activity and duration of support have increased. There has been a shift from first- and second- to third-generation devices, and an associated improvement in survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECMO; Heart transplantation; Mechanical circulatory support (MCS); Survival; ventricular assist device (VAD)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23901056     DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  10 in total

1.  A UK Single Centre Retrospective Analysis of the Relationship between Haemodynamic Changes and Outcome in Patients Undergoing Prolonged Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Massimo Capoccia; Christopher T Bowles; Anton Sabashnikov; Fabio De Robertis; Mohamed Amrani; Nicholas R Banner; Andre Simon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  The total artificial heart in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Karthik Thangappan; Awais Ashfaq; Chet Villa; David L S Morales
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-03

3.  Central extracorporeal life support with left ventricular decompression for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and lung failure.

Authors:  Alexander Weymann; Bastian Schmack; Anton Sabashnikov; Christopher T Bowles; Philipp Raake; Rawa Arif; Markus Verch; Ursula Tochtermann; Jens Roggenbach; Aron Frederik Popov; Andre Ruediger Simon; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Four-year outcomes with third-generation centrifugal left ventricular assist devices in an era of restricted transplantation.

Authors:  Faruk Özalp; Sai Bhagra; Catriona Bhagra; Tanveer Butt; Bandigowdanapalya Ramesh; Nicola Robinson-Smith; Neil Wrightson; Gareth Parry; Massimo Griselli; Asif Hasan; Stephan Schueler; Guy A MacGowan
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Advanced mechanical circulatory support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a 20-year outcome analysis in a non-transplant unit.

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Kasra Shaikhrezai; Sai Prasad; Renzo Pessotto; William Walker; Geoffrey Berg; Vipin Zamvar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 6.  Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Christopher T Bowles; Rachel Hards; Neil Wrightson; Paul Lincoln; Shishir Kore; Laura Marley; Jonathan R Dalzell; Binu Raj; Tracey A Baker; Diane Goodwin; Petra Carroll; Jane Pateman; John J M Black; Paul Kattenhorn; Mark Faulkner; Jayan Parameshwar; Charles Butcher; Mark Mason; Alexander Rosenberg; Ian McGovern; Alexander Weymann; Carl Gwinnutt; Nicholas R Banner; Stephan Schueler; Andre R Simon; David W Pitcher
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Scott Dougherty; Omar Bouamra; Vasudev Pai; Philip Curry; Steven Tsui; Stephen Clark; Stephen Westaby; Nawwar Al-Attar; Vipin Zamvar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 8.  The Total Artificial Heart in End-Stage Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Chet R Villa; David L S Morales
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  An early analysis of cost-utility of baroreflex activation therapy in advanced chronic heart failure in Germany.

Authors:  Oleg Borisenko; Jochen Müller-Ehmsen; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Erik Rafflenbeul; Christian Hamm
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Scott Dougherty; Andrew Sinclair; Keith Buchan; Fiona MacLennan; Omar Bouamra; Philip Curry; Vipin Zamvar; Geoffrey Berg; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.