BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the prevalence or risk factors for non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions and to identify associated patient characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty adults aged ≥ 65 admitted to medical and surgical units of a tertiary care facility and meeting inclusion criteria. MEASURES: We collected information on demographics, psycho-social factors, discharge diagnoses, and medications using surveys and patient medical records. Domains within discharge instructions included medications, follow-up appointments, diet, and exercise. At 5 days post-discharge, we assessed comprehension by asking patients about their discharge instructions, and compared responses to written instructions from medical charts. We assessed compliance among patients who understood their instructions. RESULTS: Prevalence of non-comprehension was 5 % for follow-up appointments, 27 % for medications, 48 % for exercise and 50 % for diet recommendations. Age was associated with non-comprehension of medication [odds ratio (OR) 1.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.12] and follow-up appointment (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.17) instructions. Male sex was associated with non-comprehension of diet instructions (OR 1.91; 95 % CI 1.10, 3.31). Social isolation was associated with non-comprehension of exercise instructions (OR 9.42; 95 % CI 1.50, 59.11) Depression was associated with non-compliance with medication (OR 2.29; 95 % CI 1.02, 5.10) and diet instructions (OR 3.30; 95 % CI 1.24, 8.83). CONCLUSIONS: Non-comprehension of discharge instructions among older adults is prevalent, multi-factorial, and varies by domain.
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the prevalence or risk factors for non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions and to identify associated patient characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty adults aged ≥ 65 admitted to medical and surgical units of a tertiary care facility and meeting inclusion criteria. MEASURES: We collected information on demographics, psycho-social factors, discharge diagnoses, and medications using surveys and patient medical records. Domains within discharge instructions included medications, follow-up appointments, diet, and exercise. At 5 days post-discharge, we assessed comprehension by asking patients about their discharge instructions, and compared responses to written instructions from medical charts. We assessed compliance among patients who understood their instructions. RESULTS: Prevalence of non-comprehension was 5 % for follow-up appointments, 27 % for medications, 48 % for exercise and 50 % for diet recommendations. Age was associated with non-comprehension of medication [odds ratio (OR) 1.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.12] and follow-up appointment (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.17) instructions. Male sex was associated with non-comprehension of diet instructions (OR 1.91; 95 % CI 1.10, 3.31). Social isolation was associated with non-comprehension of exercise instructions (OR 9.42; 95 % CI 1.50, 59.11) Depression was associated with non-compliance with medication (OR 2.29; 95 % CI 1.02, 5.10) and diet instructions (OR 3.30; 95 % CI 1.24, 8.83). CONCLUSIONS: Non-comprehension of discharge instructions among older adults is prevalent, multi-factorial, and varies by domain.
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; John P Moriarty; Christine Chen; Robert L Fogerty; Ursula C Brewster; Sandhya Kanade; Boback Ziaeian; Grace Y Jenq; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Susan N Hastings; Amanda Barrett; Morris Weinberger; Eugene Z Oddone; Luna Ragsdale; Michael Hocker; Kenneth E Schmader Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Jerry L Grenard; Brett A Munjas; John L Adams; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leah S Karliner; Andrew Auerbach; Anna Nápoles; Dean Schillinger; Dana Nickleach; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Eric A Coleman; Amita Chugh; Mark V Williams; Jim Grigsby; Jeffrey J Glasheen; Marlene McKenzie; Sung-Joon Min Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Jonathan S Lee; Anna Nápoles; Sunita Mutha; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-07-24
Authors: Heidi L Wald; Luci K Leykum; Melissa L P Mattison; Eduard E Vasilevskis; David O Meltzer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Alexander F Glick; Jonathan S Farkas; Joseph Nicholson; Benard P Dreyer; Melissa Fears; Christopher Bandera; Tanya Stolper; Nicole Gerber; H Shonna Yin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Molly E Waring; David D McManus; Stephenie C Lemon; Joel M Gore; Milena D Anatchkova; Richard H McManus; Arlene S Ash; Robert J Goldberg; Catarina I Kiefe; Jane S Saczynski Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-10-23
Authors: H Spechbach; I Fabreguet; E Saule; M Hars; J Stirnemann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Alicia I Arbaje; Ashley Hughes; Nicole Werner; Kimberly Carl; Dawn Hohl; Kate Jones; Kathryn H Bowles; Kitty Chan; Bruce Leff; Ayse P Gurses Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 7.035