OBJECTIVES: To describe older patients' understanding of emergency department (ED) discharge information and to explore the relationship between understanding of ED discharge information and adverse outcomes. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with patients 65 years or older (or their proxies) within 72 hours of discharge from an academic medical center ED. We assessed 4 areas of discharge information: ED diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care instructions, and return precautions. Adverse events were defined as repeat ED visits and hospitalizations or deaths within 90 days of ED discharge. Reverse Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to illustrate cumulative event probabilities according to patient understanding of discharge information (differences examined with log-rank tests). RESULTS: Of 92 respondents (mean patient age, 75.1; SD, 7.4; 59.8% female subjects), patients or proxies reported not understanding discharge information about diagnosis (20.7%), self-care instructions (16.3%), expected course of illness (63%), and return precautions (55.7%). Within 90 days of ED discharge, 42.3% of patients had returned to the ED, 30.4% were hospitalized, and 4.3% had died. There was little difference in cumulative event probabilities according to whether patients understood self-care instructions or return precautions. Adverse event probabilities were higher among patients who did not understand their ED diagnosis (P = 0.33) and those who did not understand expected course of illness (P = 0.12), although these did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of older patients, or proxies, may not understand ED discharge information, and this could have an effect on patient outcomes. Strategies are needed to improve communication of ED discharge information to older patients and their families.
OBJECTIVES: To describe older patients' understanding of emergency department (ED) discharge information and to explore the relationship between understanding of ED discharge information and adverse outcomes. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with patients 65 years or older (or their proxies) within 72 hours of discharge from an academic medical center ED. We assessed 4 areas of discharge information: ED diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care instructions, and return precautions. Adverse events were defined as repeat ED visits and hospitalizations or deaths within 90 days of ED discharge. Reverse Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to illustrate cumulative event probabilities according to patient understanding of discharge information (differences examined with log-rank tests). RESULTS: Of 92 respondents (mean patient age, 75.1; SD, 7.4; 59.8% female subjects), patients or proxies reported not understanding discharge information about diagnosis (20.7%), self-care instructions (16.3%), expected course of illness (63%), and return precautions (55.7%). Within 90 days of ED discharge, 42.3% of patients had returned to the ED, 30.4% were hospitalized, and 4.3% had died. There was little difference in cumulative event probabilities according to whether patients understood self-care instructions or return precautions. Adverse event probabilities were higher among patients who did not understand their ED diagnosis (P = 0.33) and those who did not understand expected course of illness (P = 0.12), although these did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of older patients, or proxies, may not understand ED discharge information, and this could have an effect on patient outcomes. Strategies are needed to improve communication of ED discharge information to older patients and their families.
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; John P Moriarty; Christine Chen; Robert L Fogerty; Ursula C Brewster; Sandhya Kanade; Boback Ziaeian; Grace Y Jenq; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alexander F Glick; Jonathan S Farkas; Joseph Nicholson; Benard P Dreyer; Melissa Fears; Christopher Bandera; Tanya Stolper; Nicole Gerber; H Shonna Yin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Melody S Goodman; Margaret J Lin; Andrew T Melson; Richard T Griffey Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jin H Han; Ayumi Shintani; Svetlana Eden; Alessandro Morandi; Laurence M Solberg; John Schnelle; Robert S Dittus; Alan B Storrow; E Wesley Ely Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-04-03 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Carolyn Horney; Kenneth Schmader; Linda L Sanders; Mitchell Heflin; Luna Ragsdale; Eleanor McConnell; Michael Hocker; S Nicole Hastings Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2011-01-08 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Bobby DesPain; Travis N Keeling; Mansi Shah; Morgan Rothenberger Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Nicole Shin; Solita Jones; Nnenna Aginam; Maureen Gross; Yonitte Kinsella; Jennifer A Williams; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Commun Healthc Date: 2015-03
Authors: J S Albrecht; A L Gruber-Baldini; J M Hirshon; C H Brown; R Goldberg; J H Rosenberg; A C Comer; J P Furuno Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ivy Benjenk; Eva H DuGoff; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Nia Cayenne; Courtney M C Jones; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Rebecca K Green; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.451