Literature DB >> 2501518

Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer.

L A Gervasi1, J Mata, J D Easley, J H Wilbanks, C Seale-Hawkins, C E Carlton, P T Scardino.   

Abstract

Pelvic lymph node metastases indicate a poor prognosis for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer but the significance of minimal nodal metastases still is debated. We determined the progression and cancer specific survival rates based on the extent of nodal metastases in 511 patients followed for a mean of 8.6 years (range 2.5 to 17.5 years) after bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and irradiation therapy. The patients were divided into 4 groups based on the extent of nodal metastases: NO--negative nodes (359 patients), N1--a single microscopic positive node (37), N2--multiple microscopic positive nodes (86) and N3--grossly positive or juxtaregional nodes (29). The risks of distant metastases and of dying of prostate cancer were much greater in the 152 patients with positive nodes (N+) than in those with negative nodes (p less than 0.00005). The risk of metastatic disease at 10 years was only 31 +/- 7 per cent for the NO patients compared to 83 +/- 7 per cent for the N+ patients, and the risk of dying of prostate cancer was only 17 +/- 6 per cent at 10 years for the NO group and 57 +/- 11 per cent for the N+ patients. Patients with a single microscopic node (N1) had a pattern of progression and cancer specific mortality rate similar to patients with more extensive nodal metastases and markedly worse than patients with negative nodes. The risk of distant metastases was 80 +/- 15 per cent at 10 years for the N1 group, 84 +/- 11 per cent for the N2 group and 88 +/- 13 per cent for the N3 group, while the risk of dying of prostate cancer at 10 years was 40 +/- 19, 66 +/- 15 and 58 +/- 24 per cent, respectively. The finding of a single pelvic lymph node containing microscopic metastatic disease markedly worsened the prognosis of our patients with prostate cancer. Once prostate cancer is found within the pelvic lymph nodes the patient has systemic disease unlikely to be controlled by pelvic lymph node dissection and radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2501518     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38748-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

Review 1.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Lee C Zhao; Reed A Omary; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Maximum tumor diameter adjusted to the risk profile predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Georg Müller; Malte Rieken; Gernot Bonkat; Joel Roman Gsponer; Tatjana Vlajnic; Christian Wetterauer; Thomas C Gasser; Stephen F Wyler; Alexander Bachmann; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Experimental models to study lymphatic and blood vascular metastasis.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Byron Hann; Lily Wu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  Comparison of semi-extended and standard lymph node dissection in radical prostatectomy: A single-institute experience.

Authors:  Senji Hoshi; Natuho Hayashi; Yuuta Kurota; Kiyotsugu Hoshi; Akinori Muto; Osamu Sugano; Kenji Numahata; Vladimir Bilim; Isoji Sasagawa; Shoichiro Ohta
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-08

6.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging in the advanced management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Robotic-assisted fluorescence sentinel lymph node mapping using multimodal image guidance in an animal model.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Sean P Stroup; Zhengtao Qin; Carl K Hoh; David J Hall; David R Vera; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Detection of pelvic lymph node micrometastasis by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in prostate cancer patients after hormonal therapy.

Authors:  Ding-Yi Liu; Wei-Mu Xia; Qi Tang; Jian Wang; Min-Wei Wang; Ying Wang; Shu-Jun Wang; Yong-Feng Ye; Wen-Long Zhou; Yuan Shao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Improved performance of SPECT-CT In-111 capromab pendetide by correlation with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for identifying metastatic pelvic lymphadenopathy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew D Hardie; William J Rieter; Marques L Bradshaw; Leonie L Gordon; Matthew A Young; Thomas E Keane
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Prostate cancer imaging with a new monoclonal antibody: a preliminary report.

Authors:  E Sanford; R Grzonka; A Heal; M Helal; L Persky; I Tyson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.