PURPOSE: To preliminarily evaluate the potential for an improvement in diagnostic performance by a combined interpretation of In-111 capromab pendetide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) including computed tomography (CT) image fusion with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) for identifying prostate cancer in pelvic lymph nodes thru correlation with histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional approved, retrospective study identified patients with available histopathology of lymph nodes removed at the time of radical prostatectomy and who had undergone staging with In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT and/or pelvic MRI (including DWI). The performance of In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT for identifying malignant lymph nodes was assessed. Subsequently, a combined reading of In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT and prostate MRI with DWI was performed and the performance assessed. RESULTS: 18 patients underwent In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT. Of these, 12 patients had also undergone imaging with MR-DWI. In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT had a sensitivity of 40.0% and specificity of 96.7% for identification of malignant lymph nodes. However, In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT combined with MRI with DWI had a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 98.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MR-DWI to the interpretation of In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT may increase the sensitivity for detecting malignant lymph nodes in prostate cancer. Future prospective evaluation of combined In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT-CT and MR-DWI is indicated and may improve clinical evaluation of nodal disease in prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: To preliminarily evaluate the potential for an improvement in diagnostic performance by a combined interpretation of In-111capromab pendetide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) including computed tomography (CT) image fusion with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) for identifying prostate cancer in pelvic lymph nodes thru correlation with histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional approved, retrospective study identified patients with available histopathology of lymph nodes removed at the time of radical prostatectomy and who had undergone staging with In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT and/or pelvic MRI (including DWI). The performance of In-111capromab pendetide SPECT for identifying malignant lymph nodes was assessed. Subsequently, a combined reading of In-111capromab pendetide SPECT and prostate MRI with DWI was performed and the performance assessed. RESULTS: 18 patients underwent In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT. Of these, 12 patients had also undergone imaging with MR-DWI. In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT had a sensitivity of 40.0% and specificity of 96.7% for identification of malignant lymph nodes. However, In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT combined with MRI with DWI had a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 98.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MR-DWI to the interpretation of In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT may increase the sensitivity for detecting malignant lymph nodes in prostate cancer. Future prospective evaluation of combined In-111capromab pendetide SPECT-CT and MR-DWI is indicated and may improve clinical evaluation of nodal disease in prostate cancer.
Authors: Tom Budiharto; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Laura Van den Bergh; Felix Mottaghy; Christophe M Deroose; Raymond Oyen; Filip Ameye; Kris Bogaerts; Karin Haustermans; Hendrik Van Poppel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: G L Wright; B M Grob; C Haley; K Grossman; K Newhall; D Petrylak; J Troyer; A Konchuba; P F Schellhammer; R Moriarty Journal: Urology Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: M J Manyak; G H Hinkle; J O Olsen; R P Chiaccherini; A W Partin; S Piantadosi; J K Burgers; J H Texter; C E Neal; J A Libertino; G L Wright; R T Maguire Journal: Urology Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: William J Rieter; Thomas E Keane; Mark A Ahlman; Clayton T Ellis; Kenneth M Spicer; Leonie L Gordon Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Michael L Blute; James H Eastham; Markus Graefen; Axel Heidenreich; Jeffrey R Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Urs E Studer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Julie K Jang; Leslie A Khawli; Ryan Park; Brian W Wu; Zibo Li; David Canter; Peter S Conti; Alan L Epstein Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 6.261