Literature DB >> 25014048

Cerebellar theta burst stimulation in stroke patients with ataxia.

Sonia Bonnì, Viviana Ponzo, Carlo Caltagirone, Giacomo Koch.   

Abstract

Evidence for effective improvement of the symptoms of cerebellar stroke is still limited. Here, we investigated the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the injured cerebellar hemisphere in six patients with posterior circulation stroke. We applied a two-week course of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Before and after the iTBS treatment, paired-pulse TMS methods were used to explore: i) the functional connectivity between the cerebellar hemisphere and the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1), by means of the cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) protocol; and ii) the intracortical circuits in the contralateral M1, by means of the short intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) and intra-cortical facilitation (ICF) protocols. Patients were also evaluated using the Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS). Cerebellar iTBS induced a decrease in CBI and an increase in ICF at an interstimulus interval of 15 msec. These neurophysiological changes were paralleled by a clinical improvement, shown by the MICARS posture and gait subscale scores. Cerebellar iTBS could be a promising tool to promote recovery of cerebellar stroke patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25014048      PMCID: PMC4172246     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Neurol        ISSN: 0393-5264


  24 in total

Review 1.  Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Nicola Smania; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Stefano Paolucci; Marco Iosa; Patrizia Ianes; Serena Recchia; Chiara Giovanzana; Franco Molteni; Renato Avesani; Pietro Di Paolo; Massimo Zaccala; Michela Agostini; Cristina Tassorelli; Antonio Fiaschi; Daniela Primon; Maria Grazia Ceravolo; Simona Farina
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a tool for human cerebellar plasticity.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Moving, sensing and learning with cerebellar damage.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Changes of cortical excitability of human motor cortex in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Domenico A Restivo; Sara Lanza; Riccardo Saponara; Giuseppe Rapisarda; Salvatore Giuffrida; Agostino Palmeri
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 6.  Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant?

Authors:  G Kwakkel; B J Kollen
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  Clinical characteristics of patients with brainstem strokes admitted to a rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  Robert Teasell; Norine Foley; Timothy Doherty; Hillel Finestone
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Motor cortex excitability after cerebellar infarction.

Authors:  J Liepert; T Kucinski; O Tüscher; F Pawlas; T Bäumer; C Weiller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  The effect of short-duration bursts of high-frequency, low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Guillermo O Paradiso; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Carolyn Gunraj; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  24 in total

1.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum. Moving towards the clinic.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

4.  Cerebellar transcranial static magnetic field stimulation transiently reduces cerebellar brain inhibition.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Y Okada
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2017 Apr/Jun

5.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: Moving Towards Clinical Applications for Cerebellar and Extra-Cerebellar Disorders.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 6.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  Neurorestoration after stroke.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Anand Veeravagu; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 9.  Understanding and modulating motor learning with cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.