Literature DB >> 25013430

The educational utility of simulations in teaching history and physical examination skills in diagnosing breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Jory S Simpson1.   

Abstract

This paper is a review of the literature examining the use of medical simulations to teach our future healthcare providers how to diagnose breast cancer. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify the literature published between 1990 and 2014. In total, 113 articles were retrieved and evaluated for their relevance to the topic. Simulation methods, such as standardized patients and breast models were found to enhance students' abilities to perform patient histories and physical examinations to detect breast cancer. In addition, simulation can help trainees learn how to communicate bad news to patients effectively. There is an abundance of literature supporting the continued use of simulations in the curricula of medical schools. However, future studies based on sound theoretical frameworks are needed to evaluate the positive effects of simulation-based education on patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Models; Patient simulation; Standardized patients

Year:  2014        PMID: 25013430      PMCID: PMC4090311          DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1738-6756            Impact factor:   3.588


  22 in total

1.  Education of medical students in clinical breast examination during surgical clerkship.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle; Angela M Babbo; Micheal Posner; Derrick J Beech
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Impact of a standardized patient intervention to teach breast and abdominal examination skills to third-year medical students at two institutions.

Authors:  A K Sachdeva; P J Wolfson; P G Blair; D R Gillum; E J Gracely; M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Effectiveness of a dynamic breast examination training model to improve clinical breast examination (CBE) skills.

Authors:  Gregory J Gerling; Alicia M Weissman; Geb W Thomas; Edwin L Dove
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2003

4.  The effect of standardized patient feedback in teaching surgical residents informed consent: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Kristine Leeper-Majors; James R Veale; Thomas S Westbrook; Kendall Reed
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review.

Authors:  Judith Gaffan; Jane Dacre; Alison Jones
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Augmented, pulsating tactile feedback facilitates simulator training of clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  Gregory J Gerling; Geb W Thomas
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 7.  A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training.

Authors:  J B Cooper; V R Taqueti
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings.

Authors:  J Vetto; R Pommier; W Schmidt; M Wachtel; P DuBois; M Jones; A Thurmond
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  2 in total

1.  Commentary: simulations in breast cancer: the next steps.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

2.  Standardized patients in psychiatry - the best way to learn clinical skills?

Authors:  Monika Himmelbauer; Tamara Seitz; Charles Seidman; Henriette Löffler-Stastka
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.