Judith Gaffan1, Jane Dacre, Alison Jones. 1. Academic Centre for Medical Education, Royal Free and University College Medical School Archway Campus, London, United Kingdom. j.gaffan@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: This article is a review of the literature regarding teaching oncology to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: MEDLINE, Psychinfo, ERIC, TIMELIT, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched, using the search terms cancer, oncology, education, undergraduate, and teaching. RESULTS: The main findings can be summarized as follows: the involvement of patients in teaching is popular with students and portfolio learning is a successful way of involving patients; the use of standardized patients to teach breast examination improves students' performance in clinical assessment; the use of silicone models to teach breast examination improves students' sensitivity for detecting breast lumps; computer aided learning modules have a role, but are not superior to other types of learning; learning about cancer screening and prevention increases students' knowledge, improves their self rated skills, and changes their behavior; and cancer patients have an important role to play in teaching undergraduate communication skills. CONCLUSION: We have found 48 articles on undergraduate teaching in oncology. Oncology teachers should consider adopting the evidence based approaches outlined in this review, and there should be more emphasis on educational research within the field of oncology.
PURPOSE: This article is a review of the literature regarding teaching oncology to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: MEDLINE, Psychinfo, ERIC, TIMELIT, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched, using the search terms cancer, oncology, education, undergraduate, and teaching. RESULTS: The main findings can be summarized as follows: the involvement of patients in teaching is popular with students and portfolio learning is a successful way of involving patients; the use of standardized patients to teach breast examination improves students' performance in clinical assessment; the use of silicone models to teach breast examination improves students' sensitivity for detecting breast lumps; computer aided learning modules have a role, but are not superior to other types of learning; learning about cancer screening and prevention increases students' knowledge, improves their self rated skills, and changes their behavior; and cancerpatients have an important role to play in teaching undergraduate communication skills. CONCLUSION: We have found 48 articles on undergraduate teaching in oncology. Oncology teachers should consider adopting the evidence based approaches outlined in this review, and there should be more emphasis on educational research within the field of oncology.
Authors: René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Ana Helena Lopes; Almir José Sarri; Zuleica Caulada Benedetti; Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Wayne D Newhauser; Michael E Scheurer; Jessica M Faupel-Badger; Jessica Clague; Jeffrey Weitzel; Kendra V Woods Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sabine Fromm-Haidenberger; Gudrun Pohl; Joachim Widder; Gerhard Kren; Florian Fitzal; Rupert Bartsch; Jakob de Vries; Christoph Zielinski; Richard Pötter Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.037