BACKGROUND: This study examined whether a single intervention with standardized patients (SPs) as a supplement to traditional teaching during the surgery clerkship would enhance the breast and abdominal examination skills of third-year medical students. METHODS:During the academic year 1994-1995, 153 students from two institutions were assigned to control or experimental groups. At institution A, all students underwent pretests and posttests with SPs; at institution B, no pretest was conducted. All experimental students received group and one-to-one instruction with SPs during the intervention session. RESULTS: At posttest, the experimental group performed better than the control group on breast examination (P = 0.002), professionalism during this examination (P <0.001), abdominal examination (P <0.001), and professionalism during the latter examination (P = 0.050). The improvement from pretest to posttest at institution A was significantly greater in the experimental group than the control group for the breast examination (P = 0.036) and the abdominal examination (P <0.001). Analyses on a variety of specific tasks within each examination were also performed. CONCLUSION: A single intervention with SPs teaching breast and abdominal examinations resulted in significant enhancement of these clinical skills.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study examined whether a single intervention with standardized patients (SPs) as a supplement to traditional teaching during the surgery clerkship would enhance the breast and abdominal examination skills of third-year medical students. METHODS: During the academic year 1994-1995, 153 students from two institutions were assigned to control or experimental groups. At institution A, all students underwent pretests and posttests with SPs; at institution B, no pretest was conducted. All experimental students received group and one-to-one instruction with SPs during the intervention session. RESULTS: At posttest, the experimental group performed better than the control group on breast examination (P = 0.002), professionalism during this examination (P <0.001), abdominal examination (P <0.001), and professionalism during the latter examination (P = 0.050). The improvement from pretest to posttest at institution A was significantly greater in the experimental group than the control group for the breast examination (P = 0.036) and the abdominal examination (P <0.001). Analyses on a variety of specific tasks within each examination were also performed. CONCLUSION: A single intervention with SPs teaching breast and abdominal examinations resulted in significant enhancement of these clinical skills.
Authors: M Triola; H Feldman; A L Kalet; S Zabar; E K Kachur; C Gillespie; M Anderson; C Griesser; M Lipkin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joseph E Safdieh; Andrew L Lin; Juliet Aizer; Peter M Marzuk; Bernice Grafstein; Carol Storey-Johnson; Yoon Kang Journal: Med Educ Online Date: 2011-01-14
Authors: Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Robert M Hamm; David M Kelley; Jose A Medina; Noreen S Syed; Geraint A Harris; Frank J Papa Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 2.463