Shahnawaz Anwer1, Ameed Equebal2, Tushar J Palekar3, M Nezamuddin2, Osama Neyaz2, Ahmad Alghadir4. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, KSA ; Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth India. 2. National Institute for the Orthopedically Handicapped (NIOH), India. 3. Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth India. 4. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, KSA.
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to describe the effect of locomotor training on a treadmill for three individuals who have an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). [Subjects and Methods] Three indivduals (2 males, 1 female) with incomplete paraplegia participated in this prospective case series. All subjects participated in locomotor training for a maximum of 20 minutes on a motorized treadmill without elevation at a comfortable walking speed three days a week for four weeks as an adjunct to a conventional physiotherapy program. The lower extremity strength and walking capabilities were used as the outcome measures of this study. Lower extremity strength was measured by lower extremity motor score (LEMS). Walking capability was assessed using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II). [Results] An increase in lower extremity motor score and walking capabilities at the end of training program was found. [Conclusion] Gait training on a treadmill can enhance motor recovery and walking capabilities in subjects with incomplete SCI. Further research is needed to generalize these findings and to identify which patients might benefit from locomotor training.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to describe the effect of locomotor training on a treadmill for three individuals who have an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). [Subjects and Methods] Three indivduals (2 males, 1 female) with incomplete paraplegia participated in this prospective case series. All subjects participated in locomotor training for a maximum of 20 minutes on a motorized treadmill without elevation at a comfortable walking speed three days a week for four weeks as an adjunct to a conventional physiotherapy program. The lower extremity strength and walking capabilities were used as the outcome measures of this study. Lower extremity strength was measured by lower extremity motor score (LEMS). Walking capability was assessed using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II). [Results] An increase in lower extremity motor score and walking capabilities at the end of training program was found. [Conclusion] Gait training on a treadmill can enhance motor recovery and walking capabilities in subjects with incomplete SCI. Further research is needed to generalize these findings and to identify which patients might benefit from locomotor training.
Several reports indicate that patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) can recover
locomotor function after locomotor training1, 2). The reason for this improvement in
locomotor activity was thought to be mainly due to an adaptation of spinal neuronal networks
to physiological proprioceptive inputs3).
Strengthening of cortical input might also play an important role in functional recovery of
locomotion4). A few studies have reported
beneficial effects of locomotor training on a treadmill with partial body weight support in
patients with incomplete paraplegia5, 6). These effects can also be seen in patients
with complete injuries of the spinal cord7).Several investigators have reported significant improvement of lower limb muscle strength
following locomotor training. However, some investigators have also investigated the effect
of locomotor training on recovery of lower limb muscle strength as a secondary outcome8,9,10). A conventional training program primarily
provides compensatory strategies for achieving mobility and strengthening above the level of
the lesion11, 12). Previously, various methods to enhance locomotor recovery have
been explored in humans using locomotor training that optimizes sensory information
associated with locomotion2, 7, 13). The purpose of
this case series was to describe locomotor training incorporating gait training on a
treadmill enhance motor recovery and walking capabilities in patients with incomplete
SCI.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
Three patients (2 males, 1 female) with incomplete paraplegia received gait training on a
treadmill as an adjunct to their conventional physiotherapy programs. Subject 1 was a
40 year-old male who was 14 months post injury and had a T6 injury classified as ASIA D
based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale and neurological
classification standards. Subject 2 was a 48 year-old male who was 10 months post injury
and had a T8 injury classified as ASIA C based on the ASIA Impairment Scale and
neurological classification standards. Subject 3 was a 38 year-old female who was12 months
post injury. She had a T10 incomplete spinal cord injury classified as ASIA D. The
subjects were able to walk on level ground with the help of a standard walker or two
crutches. Those subjects found medically unstable and symptomatic for bladder infection,
decubitus ulcers, cardiopulmonary disease, or other significant medical complications
prohibiting testing and/or training were excluded. The subjects signed an informed consent
form approved by the institutional ethics committee. This study was conducted at the
National Institute for the Orthopedically Handicapped (NIOH), Kolkata, India.
Methods
All three subjects underwent a gait training program for a maximum of 20 minutes on a
motorized treadmill without elevation at a comfortable walking speed three days a week for
four weeks as an adjunct to their standard physiotherapy programs. The speed was gradually
increased from 0.5 m/sec to 3 m/sec as per the patient’s ability while the subjects held
onto for support. The therapist provided the subjects with verbal cues for taking equal
step lengths and for sustaining an upright posture to maintain balance.The subjects’ standard physiotherapy program included stretching exercises for tight
musculature. Each stretch was performed for three repetitions with a 30-second hold,
followed by a minimum of 30 minutes of a standing program in an Oswestry frame. Subjects
then participated in mat activities like standing on their knees, walking on their knees,
push-ups, bridging, and abdominal curls for 30 minutes. Subjects also underwent in a
strengthening program for upper extremities and balance training.Strengthening exercises of upper extremity muscles such as the shoulder abductors,
adductors, rotators, biceps brachii, and triceps brachii were completed for 3 sets of 10
repetitions each following the Delorme regimen of progressive resistive exercise
(PRE)14). The rest periods between
repetitions and sets were 30 seconds and 60 seconds respectively, and there was a 5-minute
rest period between exercises. Increases of 10% resistance were made gradually every
week14). Balance training consisted of
task-oriented training on a physio ball. While sitting on the physio ball, each subject
reached forward, to the left, and to the right while trying to touch the therapist’s hand.
Only when the subject could actually touch the therapist’s hand were they marked as “task
completed”. For forward reach, both hands of the subjects were extended. For the left and
right side reach, reaching from one side to the other was counted as one repetition. Each
task was performed in sets of 5, with each set consisting of 10 repetitions and a
one-minute rest between each set.The lower extremity strength and walking capabilities were used as the outcome measures
of this study. Lower extremity strength was measured by lower extremity motor score
(LEMS). The LEMS represents the sum of the scores on the manual muscle strength test for
five key lower extremity muscles as defined in the International Standards for
Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury15). The specific muscle groups tested correspond roughly to
segmental innervation levels L2–S1 and included hip flexors, knee extensors, ankle
dorsiflexors, great toe extensors, and ankle plantar flexors; ordinal scores ranging from
0 to 5 were used for scoring. The total scores from all lower-extremity muscles tested
bilaterally were summed to provide the Lower-Extremity Motor Score (LEMS). The total score
ranges between 0 and 50. The correlation of ASIA motor scores with conventional manual
muscle testing in all major muscle groups of the lower extremity was previously found to
be high16). However, Noreau and
Vachon17) reported decreased
sensitivity of manual muscle testing in people with SCI at grades greater than 3.
Similarly, Jonsson et al.18) found
inconsistent inter-rater reliability of motor scores generated during ASIA assessment
(Kappa statistics 0.48 −0.89 for LEMS).Walking capability was assessed using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI
II). The WISCI II categorizes a person’s walking capability based on the need for physical
assistance and assistive devices and/or braces19). It is a 20-item scale with a score ranging from 0 (meaning the
patient is unable to walk) to 20 (meaning the patient can walk with no assistive device,
no braces, and no assistance for at least 10 meters)20).
RESULTS
All three subjects improved their lower extremity motor scores and walking capabilities
over the four-week training period. Table
1 details the outcomes of training for each subject.
Table 1.
Comparison of lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and walking
capabilities
Variables
Subject 1
Subject 2
Subject 3
Baseline
Week 4
Baseline
Week 4
Baseline
Week 4
LEMS
19
32
17
30
17
28
WISCI
8
19
12
19
11
18
DISCUSSION
This study evaluated the effect of treadmill training on the motor recovery and walking
capabilities in three patients with incomplete SCI. Previous studies have shown locomotor
recovery after locomotor training in patients with incomplete SCI1, 2, 9). The results of this study also suggest that treadmill training
without weight support is feasible and beneficial for patients with incomplete
paraplegia.In present study, all three patients improved their levels of lower extremity muscle
strength and walking capabilities over the four-week training period. In patients with
incomplete SCI, treadmill training may strengthen cortical input, which in turn may
contribute to these improvements4). Hornby
et al.21) reported that after treadmill
training, subjects with incomplete SCI showed improved lower extremity muscle strength and
walking capability.Recently, Gorassini et al.22) reported
that after treadmill training, subjects with incomplete SCI showed an increase in muscle
activity on EMG with functional recovery of walking skills. Similarly, Anwer et al.23) reported improved gait parameters and
functional independence after 4 weeks of treadmill training in patients with incomplete
spinal cord injury. Conversely, Wirz et al.8) found that only 2/20 patients with ASIA C or D grade SCI
demonstrated improvements in walking ability, as determined by WISCI II scores.In previous studies, training intensity was reported to be 15 minutes3, 24), 20 minutes25), or 30 minutes26) at a frequency of 3 days a week8) or 5 days a week26). Similarly, we chose a training protocol consisting of 20 minutes
at a frequency of 3 days a week for 4 weeks. However, the patients in the present study
recieved treadmill training without body weight support.In this report, we presented the results of three individual case studies. Without a
control group, factors other than the locomotor training may have contributed to the
outcomes and affected the recovery of muscle strength and locomotion. Investigating the
influence of injury chronicity, level, and severity and of age at the time of injury on the
outcomes of locomotor training is certainly warranted via controlled, experimental studies.
The present study suggests that gait training on a treadmill can be used to enhance motor
recovery and walking capabilities in subjects with incomplete SCI. Further research is
needed to generalize these findings and to identify which patients might benefit from
locomotor training.
Authors: Andrea L Behrman; Anna R Lawless-Dixon; Sandra B Davis; Mark G Bowden; Preeti Nair; Chetan Phadke; Elizabeth M Hannold; Prudence Plummer; Susan J Harkema Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2005-12