Literature DB >> 10407124

Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function.

H Barbeau1, D A McCrea, M J O'Donovan, S Rossignol, W M Grill, M A Lemay.   

Abstract

Motivated by the challenge of improving neuroprosthetic devices, the authors review current knowledge relating to harnessing the potential of spinal neural circuits, such as reflexes and pattern generators. If such spinal interneuronal circuits could be activated, they could provide the coordinated control of many muscles that is so complex to implement with a device that aims to address each participating muscle individually. The authors' goal is to identify candidate spinal circuits and areas of research that might open opportunities to effect control of human limbs through electrical activation of such circuits. David McCrea's discussion of the ways in which hindlimb reflexes in the cat modify motor activity may help in developing optimal strategies for functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS), by using knowledge of how reflex actions can adapt to different conditions. Michael O'Donovan's discussion of the development of rhythmogenic networks in the chick embryo may provide clues to methods of generating rhythmic activity in the adult spinal cord. Serge Rossignol examines the spinal pattern generator for locomotion in cats, its trigger mechanisms, modulation and adaptation, and suggests how this knowledge can help guide therapeutic approaches in humans. Hugues Barbeau applies the work of Rossignol and others to locomotor training in human subjects who have suffered spinal cord injury (SCI) with incomplete motor function loss (IMFL). Michel Lemay and Warren Grill discuss some of the technical challenges that must be addressed by engineers to implement a neuroprosthesis using electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, particularly the control issues that would have to be resolved. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10407124     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00008-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev


  36 in total

Review 1.  Spinal-Cord plasticity: independent and interactive effects of neuromodulator and activity-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  D Parker
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2000 Aug-Dec       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Retraining the injured spinal cord.

Authors:  V R Edgerton; R D Leon; S J Harkema; J A Hodgson; N London; D J Reinkensmeyer; R R Roy; R J Talmadge; N J Tillakaratne; W Timoszyk; A Tobin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Afferent control of locomotor CPG: insights from a simple neuromechanical model.

Authors:  Sergey N Markin; Alexander N Klishko; Natalia A Shevtsova; Michel A Lemay; Boris I Prilutsky; Ilya A Rybak
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; David Apple; Hugues Barbeau; Michele Basso; Andrea Behrman; Dan Deforge; John Ditunno; Gary Dudley; Robert Elashoff; Lisa Fugate; Susan Harkema; Michael Saulino; Michael Scott
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Development of less invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation model for motor therapy in rodents.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yoshihiko Kato; Hidenori Suzuki; Yasuaki Imajo; Yuichiro Yoshida; Atsushi Moriya; Toshihiko Taguchi; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Tissue engineering the monosynaptic circuit of the stretch reflex arc with co-culture of embryonic motoneurons and proprioceptive sensory neurons.

Authors:  Xiufang Guo; Jennifer E Ayala; Mercedes Gonzalez; Maria Stancescu; Stephen Lambert; James J Hickman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial.

Authors:  B Dobkin; H Barbeau; D Deforge; J Ditunno; R Elashoff; D Apple; M Basso; A Behrman; S Harkema; M Saulino; M Scott
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Chondroitinase ABC promotes recovery of adaptive limb movements and enhances axonal growth caudal to a spinal hemisection.

Authors:  Stephanie C Jefferson; Nicole J Tester; Dena R Howland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced forelimb movement in a rodent model.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; James V Lynskey; Danielle Protas; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Changes in locomotor muscle activity after treadmill training in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Monica A Gorassini; Jonathan A Norton; Jennifer Nevett-Duchcherer; Francois D Roy; Jaynie F Yang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.