Literature DB >> 33224817

Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with different chemotherapy regimens predicts the outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.

Shicong Tang1, Ke Wang1, Kai Zheng1, Jiadong Liu1, Hengyu Zhang1, Mingjian Tan1, Hongwan Li1, Huimeng Li1, Xin Tan1, Dequan Liu1, Rong Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This retrospective analysis was designed to research whether clinical response partial response (PR)/complete response (CR) and pathological response (PCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can translate into prognosis benefit pathological response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and whether different chemotherapy regimens will influence the outcomes.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were followed up strictly. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics and recurrence was performed using the carried out by chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Clinical response was strongly correlated with lymph nodes status (P=0.032). The OS comparison of pathological response between the pCR group and non-pCR groups did not exhibit statistically significant differences (P=0.400). A similar non-significant response result was observed in the comparison of clinical response between the PR/CR and SD/PD groups group (P=0.108). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not support clinical response (P=0.156 P=0.095 respectively) or pathological response (P=0.600 P=0.144 respectively) as the predictors of prognosis. There were no significant differences in either the comparison of the clinical response group it seems no statistically significance (P=0.496) or the comparison of the pathological response group (P=0.460). OS analyses across different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens demonstrated no significant differences (P=0.307). In the PR/CR and PD/SD comparison of every single regimen, there were no significant differences. However, for patients with PR/CR patients from the comparison of five regimens, namely, TAC, FAC, AC-T, AT and TCBP demonstrated a significant difference (P=0.022). In the group of patients with luminal A breast cancer, the result of the Fisher's exact test approached significant (P=0.059).
CONCLUSIONS: Neither PR/CR nor pCR can translate into long-term outcome benefit. PR/CR and PCR are not independent predictors in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients who received a taxane + anthracycline regimen exhibited a higher recurrence rate than any other regimens, especially those patients with luminal A breast cancer. 2020 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Response; breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; outcome

Year:  2020        PMID: 33224817      PMCID: PMC7667071          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  31 in total

1.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)].

Authors:  Hirokazu Watanabe; Morihito Okada; Yasushi Kaji; Miyako Satouchi; Yozo Sato; Yuichiro Yamabe; Hiroaki Onaya; Masahiro Endo; Miyuki Sone; Yasuaki Arai
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2009-12

Review 2.  Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiangnan Kong; Meena S Moran; Ning Zhang; Bruce Haffty; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: assessing pathologic complete response as a trial-level surrogate end point for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  E L Korn; M C Sachs; L M McShane
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Luca Gianni; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; Ling-Ming Tseng; Mei-Ching Liu; Ana Lluch; Elżbieta Staroslawska; Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez; Seock-Ah Im; Jose Luiz Pedrini; Brigitte Poirier; Paolo Morandi; Vladimir Semiglazov; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Giulia Bianchi; Tania Szado; Jayantha Ratnayake; Graham Ross; Pinuccia Valagussa
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nathalie LeVasseur; J Sun; L Gondara; R Diocee; C Speers; C Lohrisch; S Chia
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Stefan Glück; Femke de Snoo; Justine Peeters; Lisette Stork-Sloots; George Somlo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Dalliah M Black; Michael Z Gilcrease; Isabelle Bedrosian; Brian P Hobbs; Sarah M DeSnyder; Rosa F Hwang; Beatriz E Adrada; Simona F Shaitelman; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Benjamin D Smith; Rosalind P Candelaria; Gildy V Babiera; Basak E Dogan; Lumarie Santiago; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer with clinically negative axilla.

Authors:  Zhao Bi; Jingjing Liu; Peng Chen; Yanbing Liu; Tong Zhao; Chunjian Wang; Zhaopeng Zhang; Xiao Sun; Pengfei Qiu; Binbin Cong; Xianrang Song; Yongsheng Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 10.  Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J S D Mieog; J A van der Hage; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.