Literature DB >> 25011977

"We don't know her history, her background": adoptive parents' perspectives on whole genome sequencing results.

Julia Crouch1, Joon-Ho Yu, Aditi G Shankar, Holly K Tabor.   

Abstract

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) can provide parents with a wide range of genetic information about their children, and adoptive parents may have unique issues to consider regarding possible access to this information. The few papers published on adoption and genetics have focused on targeted genetic testing of children in the pre-adoption context. There are no data on adoptive parents' perspectives about pediatric ES/WGS, including their preferences about different kinds of results, and the potential benefits and risks of receiving results. To explore these issues, we conducted four exploratory focus groups with adoptive parents (N = 26). The majority lacked information about their children's biological family health history and ancestry, and many viewed WGS results as a way to fill in these gaps in knowledge. Some expressed concerns about protecting their children's future privacy and autonomy, but at the same time stated that WGS results could possibly help them be proactive about their children's health. A few parents expressed concerns about the risks of WGS in a pre-adoption context, specifically about decreasing a child's chance of adoption. These results suggest that issues surrounding genetic information in the post-adoption and ES/WGS contexts need to be considered, as well as concerns about risks in the pre-adoption context. A critical challenge for ES/WGS in the context of adoption will be balancing the right to know different kinds of genetic information with the right not to know. Specific guidance for geneticists and genetic counselors may be needed to maximize benefits of WGS while minimizing harms and prohibiting misuse of the information in the adoption process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011977      PMCID: PMC4291307          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  10 in total

1.  Genetic testing in adoption. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Committee and The American College of Medical Genetics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Denise Avard; Karine Sénécal; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  The health and well-being of adopted children.

Authors:  Matthew D Bramlett; Laura F Radel; Stephen J Blumberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Comprehensive health evaluation of the newly adopted child.

Authors:  Veronnie F Jones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Childhood genetic testing for familial cancer: should adoption make a difference?

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson; Samantha J Leonard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Autonomy, Well-Being, and the Value of Genetic Testing for Adopted Persons.

Authors:  Thomas May; Harold Grotevant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-09

2.  Information Topics of Greatest Interest for Return of Genome Sequencing Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.

Authors:  Joann Seo; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody S Goodman; Barbara B Biesecker; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An examination of the association between lifetime history of prostate and pancreatic cancer diagnosis and occupation in a population sample of Canadians.

Authors:  Smriti Singh; James Ted McDonald; Gabriela Ilie; Anil Adisesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees.

Authors:  Natalie M Baptista; Kurt D Christensen; Deanna Alexis Carere; Simon A Broadley; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.