Literature DB >> 25011534

Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area and diagnostic accuracy of mitral stenosis by dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography.

Song Soo Kim1, Sung Min Ko, Meong Gun Song, Hyun Kun Chee, Jun Suk Kim, Hweung Kon Hwang, Jae-Hwan Lee.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the utility of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) for quantification of the mitral valve area (MVA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and mitral stenosis (MS) and to compare the results of DSCT with those of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). One hundred-two patients with AF and MS who had undergone electrocardiography-gated DSCT, TTE and CMR prior to operation were retrospectively enrolled. The MVA was planimetrically determined by DSCT, CMR, and TTE, as well as by Doppler TTE using the pressure half-time method (TTE-PHT). Agreement, relationship between measurements, and the highest accuracy were evaluated using Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. The MVA on DSCT (mean, 1.27 ± 0.27 cm(2)) was significantly larger than that on CMR (1.15 ± 0.28 cm(2), P < 0.05), TTE-planimetry and TTE-PHT (1.16 ± 0.28 and 1.07 ± 0.30 cm(2), respectively; P < 0.05). TTE-planimetry had better correlation with planimetry on DSCT and CMR (r = 0.65 and 0.67, respectively; P < 0.05) than TTE-PHT (r = 0.51 and 0.55, respectively; P < 0.05). Using an MVA of 1.0 cm(2) on TTE-planimetry and TTE-PHT as the reference, the optimal thresholds for detecting severe MS on DSCT was 1.19 cm(2). The planimetry of the MVA measured by DSCT may be a reliable, alternative method for the quantification of MS in patients with AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011534     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0488-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  29 in total

1.  Current evaluation and management of patients with mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Shahbudin H Rahimtoola; Alex Durairaj; Anil Mehra; Ismael Nuno
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Shiow Jiuan Lin; Peggy A Brown; Mary P Watkins; Todd A Williams; Katherine A Lehr; Wei Liu; Gregory M Lanza; Samuel A Wickline; Shelton D Caruthers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Reassessment of valve area determinations in mitral stenosis by the pressure half-time method: impact of left ventricular stiffness and peak diastolic pressure difference.

Authors:  K Karp; D Teien; P Bjerle; P Eriksson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance.

Authors:  J D Thomas; G T Wilkins; C Y Choong; V M Abascal; I F Palacios; P C Block; A E Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis.

Authors:  P M Nichol; B W Gilbert; J A Kisslo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Determination of mitral valve area by cross-sectional echocardiography.

Authors:  L S Wann; A E Weyman; H Feigenbaum; J C Dillon; K W Johnston; R C Eggleton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Measurement of mitral orifice area in patients with mitral valve disease by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  W L Henry; J M Griffith; L L Michaelis; C L McIntosh; A G Morrow; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Alexander Lembcke; Holger Thiele; André Lachnitt; Christian N H Enzweiler; Moritz Wagner; Patrick A Hein; Stephan Eddicks; Dietmar E Kivelitz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.