Literature DB >> 2501006

Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

S A Eriksson1, B O Isberg, J U Lindgren.   

Abstract

We measured the lumbar bone mineral of 19 cadavers (10 women, 9 men) by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). In addition, we determined the ultimate load and stress of each vertebra, and finally ash content and volumetric ash density of the vertebral body. We found that single energy QCT was inferior to DPA and dual energy QCT in the prediction of the ultimate load or stress of vertebrae (P less than 0.001). The ultimate stress was best predicted by using the dual energy QCT results (r = 0.71; SEE = 36.3 N/cm2) whereas the ultimate vertebral load was best predicted by using the DPA (BMC) results (r = 0.80; SEE = 740 N). If the QCT finding was multiplied with the surface area of the vertebral body it could be used to predict the ultimate load with good accuracy (r = 0.74; SEE = 841 N). All the above correlations were higher in women than in men. The frequency of vertebral compression fractures in the material was well correlated with the bone mineral findings. A nonlinear (third degree) relationship between mineral content and mechanical characteristics is proposed but within the area of measurement used in clinical practice a linear (first degree) equation is preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2501006     DOI: 10.1007/bf02553758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  20 in total

1.  Fracture of the vertebral end-plate in the lumbar spine; an experimental biochemical investigation.

Authors:  O PEREY
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1957

2.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck.

Authors:  N Dalén; L G Hellström; B Jacobson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-10

3.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

4.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; M Towsley; R Lindsay; L Markhard; D Dempster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Correlations between breaking load and CT absorption values of vertebral bodies.

Authors:  F Brassow; W Crone-Münzebrock; L Weh; R Kranz; G Eggers-Stroeder
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning.

Authors:  R A Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis.

Authors:  G H Bell; O Dunbar; J S Beck; A Gibb
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1967

9.  Load capacity of the low back.

Authors:  N Eie
Journal:  J Oslo City Hosp       Date:  1966-04

10.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  33 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.

Authors:  X S Zhu; Z M Zhang; H Q Mao; D C Geng; J Zou; G L Wang; Z G Zhang; J H Wang; L Chen; H L Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Effect of cement volume and placement on mechanical-property restoration resulting from vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sean Molloy; Lee H Riley; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  The determination of bone fracture properties by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and single-photon absorptiometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  M D Markel; M A Wikenheiser; R L Morin; D G Lewallen; E Y Chao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Sodium fluoride does not increase human bone cell proliferation or protein synthesis in vitro.

Authors:  D J Baylink; J R Farley; K H Lau; J Wergedel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Compact bone and fracture risk.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.