Literature DB >> 25009311

Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli.

Timothy N Welsh1, Sandra M Pacione, Heather F Neyedli, Matthew Ray, Jerry Ou.   

Abstract

It is widely held that the spatial compatibility effect emerges because the irrelevant spatial dimension of the target stimulus activates a response simultaneous to the activation of a response to the relevant stimulus dimension. The non-target response facilitates response planning on compatible trials, but interferes with response planning on incompatible trials. In support of this hypothesis, the trajectories of aiming movements executed on incompatible trials deviate in the direction of the stimulus location. These deviations are thought to occur because the characteristics of the simultaneously active target and non-target responses merge. Previously, target stimuli were presented at the target locations leaving open the possibility that the response activation and subsequent deviations were dependent on the stimulus-driven attentional capture associated with the dynamic change of stimulus onset. The present research was conducted to determine if attention capturing events at the target locations were necessary for the movement deviations to emerge by investigating if trajectory deviations are also observed when the spatial dimension is presented centrally. Participants in the Central condition aimed to left and right target locations based on the color of a ring worn on a finger that pointed toward the response locations. Similar to results from a Peripheral condition, trajectory deviations were observed in the Central condition. Although it is unclear if the deviations in the Central condition occurred because of attentional shifts driven by the cue or response preplanning, these results demonstrate that dynamic changes at target locations are sufficient, but not necessary, to generate trajectory deviations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25009311     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0597-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  19 in total

1.  Hand deviations toward distractors. Evidence for response competition.

Authors:  T N Welsh; D Elliott; D J Weeks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; C Lortie; G C Baylis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching.

Authors:  Timothy Welsh; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-08

4.  Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Commonalities in the neural mechanisms underlying automatic attentional shifts by gaze, gestures, and symbols.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Sakiko Yoshikawa
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  How decisions evolve: the temporal dynamics of action selection.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse; Rico Fischer; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-15

Review 8.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.