Literature DB >> 15370515

Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching.

Timothy Welsh1, Digby Elliott.   

Abstract

Consistent with action-based theories of attention, the presence of a nontarget stimulus in the environment has been shown to alter the characteristics of goal-directed movements. Specifically, it has been reported that movement trajectories veer away from (Howard & Tipper, 1997) or towards (Welsh, Elliott, & Weeks, 1999) the location of a nontarget stimulus. The purpose of the experiments reported in this paper was to test a response activation model of selective reaching conceived to account for these variable results. In agreement with the model, the trajectory changes in the movements appear to be determined by the activation levels of each competing response at the moment of response initiation. The results of the present work, as well as those of previous studies, are discussed within the framework of the model of response activation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370515     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  34 in total

1.  How automatic is the hand's automatic pilot? Evidence from dual-task studies.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Amy Mulroue; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.

Authors:  Kevin A LeBlanc; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The time course of phase correction: a kinematic investigation of motor adjustment to timing perturbations during sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; Ramesh Balasubramaniam; Peter E Keller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence.

Authors:  Michael Villiger; Sanjay Chandrasekharan; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Patrick Haggard; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Non-target flanker effects on movement in a virtual action centred reference frame.

Authors:  Sherilene M Carr; James G Phillips; James W Meehan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Objects or Locations in Vision for Action? Evidence from the MILO task.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-01-01

9.  The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Between-person effects on attention and action: Joe and Fred revisited.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Steve Hansen; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.