Literature DB >> 19167506

Commonalities in the neural mechanisms underlying automatic attentional shifts by gaze, gestures, and symbols.

Wataru Sato1, Takanori Kochiyama, Shota Uono, Sakiko Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

Eye gaze, hand-pointing gestures, and arrows automatically trigger attentional shifts. Although it has been suggested that common neural mechanisms underlie these three types of attentional shifts, this issue remains unsettled. We measured brain activity using fMRI while participants observed directional and non-directional stimuli, including eyes, hands, and arrows, to investigate this issue. Conjunction analyses revealed that the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS), the inferior parietal lobule, the inferior frontal gyrus, and the occipital cortices in the right hemisphere were more active in common in response to directional versus non-directional stimuli. These results suggest commonalities in the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the automatic attentional shifts triggered by gaze, gestures, and symbols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19167506     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Non-intentional but not automatic: reduction of word- and arrow-based compatibility effects by sound distractors in the same categorical domain.

Authors:  James D Miles; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Frontolimbic neural circuitry at 6 months predicts individual differences in joint attention at 9 months.

Authors:  Jed T Elison; Jason J Wolff; Debra C Heimer; Sarah J Paterson; Hongbin Gu; Heather C Hazlett; Martin Styner; Guido Gerig; Joseph Piven
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-12-20

4.  Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Sandra M Pacione; Heather F Neyedli; Matthew Ray; Jerry Ou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-10

5.  Activation of frontoparietal attention networks by non-predictive gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Robert M Joseph; Zachary Fricker; Brandon Keehn
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Bodily movement of approach is detected faster than that of receding.

Authors:  Hirokazu Doi; Kazuyuki Shinohara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

7.  Atypical neural networks for social orienting in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Natalie Colich; Marco Iacoboni; Eran Zaidel; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Lauri Nummenmaa; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Richard N Henson; James V Haxby; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Dorsal and ventral attention systems underlie social and symbolic cueing.

Authors:  Alicia Callejas; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Watch out! Magnetoencephalographic evidence for early modulation of attention orienting by fearful gaze cueing.

Authors:  Fanny Lachat; Teresa Farroni; Nathalie George
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.