Literature DB >> 25008799

Taste matters - effects of bypassing oral stimulation on hormone and appetite responses.

Maartje S Spetter1, Monica Mars2, Max A Viergever1, Cees de Graaf2, Paul A M Smeets3.   

Abstract

The interaction between oral and gastric signals is an important part of food intake regulation. Previous studies suggest that bypassing oral stimulation diminishes the suppression of hunger and increases gastric emptying rate. However, the role of appetite hormones, like cholecystokinin-8 and ghrelin, in this process is still unclear. Our objective was to determine the contributions of gastric and oral stimulation to subsequent appetite and hormone responses and their effect on ad libitum intake. Fourteen healthy male subjects (age 24.6±3.8y, BMI 22.3±1.6kg/m(2)) completed a randomized, single-blinded, cross-over experiment with 3 treatment-sessions: 1) Stomach distention: naso-gastric infusion of 500mL/0kJ water, 2) Stomach distention with caloric content: naso-gastric infusion of 500mL/1770kJ chocolate milk, and 3) Stomach distention with caloric content and oral exposure: oral administration of 500mL/1770kJ chocolate milk. Changes in appetite ratings and plasma glucose, insulin, cholecystokinin-8, and active and total ghrelin concentrations were measured at fixed time-points up to 30min after infusion or oral administration. Subsequently, subjects consumed an ad libitum buffet meal. Oral administration reduced appetite ratings more than both naso-gastric infusions (P<0.0001). Gastric infusion of a caloric load increased insulin and cholecystokinin-8 and decreased total ghrelin concentrations more than ingestion (all P<0.0001). No differences in active ghrelin response were observed between conditions. Ad libitum intake did not differ between oral and gastric administration of chocolate milk (P>0.05). Thus, gastric infusion of nutrients induces greater appetite hormone responses than ingestion does. These data provide novel and additional evidence that bypassing oral stimulation not only affects the appetite profile but also increases anorexigenic hormone responses, probably driven in part by faster gastric emptying. This confirms the idea that learned associations between sensory characteristics and associated metabolic consequences serve to adapt hormone responses to nutrient content. These findings underscore the importance of oral stimulation in the regulation of food intake.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCK-8; ghrelin; insulin; nasogastric feeding; satiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25008799     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  13 in total

1.  EDITORIAL: "The Koch's" view on the sense of taste in endocrinology.

Authors:  Christian A Koch
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  The Effect of Feeding Behavior on Hypothalamus in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Rats with Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Intervention.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Xiaoyan Chen; Jianhua Yan; Xinchun Li; Chen Huang; Qi Wan; Xuelian Deng; Qiao Zou
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 3.  Cephalic phase insulin release: A review of its mechanistic basis and variability in humans.

Authors:  Alexa J Pullicin; John I Glendinning; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-07-09

4.  Sugar-induced cephalic-phase insulin release is mediated by a T1r2+T1r3-independent taste transduction pathway in mice.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Sarah Stano; Marlena Holter; Tali Azenkot; Olivia Goldman; Robert F Margolskee; Joseph R Vasselli; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marlou Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Exacting Responses: Lack of Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses Upon Oro-Sensory Exposure.

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Expected Satiety: Application to Weight Management and Understanding Energy Selection in Humans.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Eva Almiron-Roig; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

8.  Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men.

Authors:  Anne G M Wijlens; Cees de Graaf; Alfrun Erkner; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Self-reported eating rate is associated with weight status in a Dutch population: a validation study and a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Janet H W van den Boer; Jentina Kranendonk; Anne van de Wiel; Edith J M Feskens; Anouk Geelen; Monica Mars
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Association between self-reported eating speed and metabolic syndrome in a Beijing adult population: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lixin Tao; Kun Yang; Fangfang Huang; Xiangtong Liu; Xia Li; Yanxia Luo; Lijuan Wu; Xiuhua Guo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.