Literature DB >> 25003521

Tracking genomic cancer evolution for precision medicine: the lung TRACERx study.

Mariam Jamal-Hanjani1, Alan Hackshaw2, Yenting Ngai2, Jacqueline Shaw3, Caroline Dive4, Sergio Quezada5, Gary Middleton6, Elza de Bruin7, John Le Quesne3, Seema Shafi7, Mary Falzon8, Stuart Horswell9, Fiona Blackhall10, Iftekhar Khan2, Sam Janes11, Marianne Nicolson12, David Lawrence13, Martin Forster14, Dean Fennell15, Siow-Ming Lee14, Jason Lester16, Keith Kerr17, Salli Muller18, Natasha Iles2, Sean Smith2, Nirupa Murugaesu1, Richard Mitter9, Max Salm9, Aengus Stuart9, Nik Matthews19, Haydn Adams20, Tanya Ahmad14, Richard Attanoos21, Jonathan Bennett22, Nicolai Juul Birkbak23, Richard Booton24, Ged Brady4, Keith Buchan25, Arrigo Capitano8, Mahendran Chetty26, Mark Cobbold27, Philip Crosbie28, Helen Davies29, Alan Denison30, Madhav Djearman31, Jacki Goldman32, Tom Haswell33, Leena Joseph34, Malgorzata Kornaszewska35, Matthew Krebs4, Gerald Langman36, Mairead MacKenzie33, Joy Millar26, Bruno Morgan3, Babu Naidu37, Daisuke Nonaka38, Karl Peggs5, Catrin Pritchard39, Hardy Remmen25, Andrew Rowan40, Rajesh Shah41, Elaine Smith42, Yvonne Summers43, Magali Taylor44, Selvaraju Veeriah7, David Waller45, Ben Wilcox46, Maggie Wilcox33, Ian Woolhouse47, Nicholas McGranahan40, Charles Swanton48.   

Abstract

The importance of intratumour genetic and functional heterogeneity is increasingly recognised as a driver of cancer progression and survival outcome. Understanding how tumour clonal heterogeneity impacts upon therapeutic outcome, however, is still an area of unmet clinical and scientific need. TRACERx (TRAcking non-small cell lung Cancer Evolution through therapy [Rx]), a prospective study of patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aims to define the evolutionary trajectories of lung cancer in both space and time through multiregion and longitudinal tumour sampling and genetic analysis. By following cancers from diagnosis to relapse, tracking the evolutionary trajectories of tumours in relation to therapeutic interventions, and determining the impact of clonal heterogeneity on clinical outcomes, TRACERx may help to identify novel therapeutic targets for NSCLC and may also serve as a model applicable to other cancer types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003521      PMCID: PMC4086714          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


Introduction

Each patient's cancer has a unique genomic landscape, often comprised of populations of genetically distinct, separated subclones with the potential to undergo dynamic evolutionary processes throughout the disease course [1],[2]. One of the major challenges in achieving the goal of precision medicine lies in obtaining an accurate view of this genomic landscape, in order to choose the appropriate therapeutic regimen [3]. Intratumour heterogeneity poses a challenge in that a single tumour biopsy may not fully capture the current or future tumour landscape and merely represents a “snapshot” of the disease in space and time. Several studies have demonstrated branched evolution in different tumour types, including breast [4],[5], pancreatic [6], kidney [7], colorectal [8], and prostate [9] cancers, as well as haematological malignancies such as chronic lymphoblastic leukaemia [1] and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [10]. Understanding how tumour clonal heterogeneity impacts upon clinical outcome, and how cancer subclones compete, adapt, and evolve through the disease course in relation to therapy, is an area of unmet clinical and scientific need. Lung TRACERx (TRAcking non-small cell lung Cancer Evolution through therapy [Rx], ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01888601), is a prospective study in primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which through multiregion and longitudinal tumour sampling and sequencing, aims to define the genomic landscape of NSCLC and to understand the impact of tumour clonal heterogeneity upon therapeutic and survival outcome.

Overview of Lung TRACERx

Lung TRACERx incorporates longitudinal sample collection from diagnosis to relapse in order to investigate how each cancer responds to treatment, the potential mutational processes and mechanisms involved in drug resistance, and development of metastatic disease. Although here we discuss TRACERx in NSCLC, the proposed longitudinal sample collection and study template is also relevant to other tumour types. TRACERx, conducted across six sites in the United Kingdom (London, Leicester, Manchester, Aberdeen, Birmingham, and Cardiff), will enrol 842 patients with primary NSCLC stages I-IIIA over an accrual period of four years with a total five-year follow-up per patient. Primary surgically resected NSCLC tumours and associated lymph nodes, surplus to diagnostic requirements, will be subject to multiregion sampling and subsequent whole-exome and/or whole-genome sequencing. In patients suffering disease recurrence, consent will be obtained for a further biopsy to assess how the tumour clonal structure has changed through therapy and disease progression. The primary objectives of TRACERx are to determine the relationship between intratumour heterogeneity and clinical outcome (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]), and to establish the impact of adjuvant platinum-containing regimens on intratumour heterogeneity in relapsed disease. The secondary objectives include developing and validating an intratumour heterogeneity index as a prognostic or predictive biomarker and identifying drivers of genomic instability, metastatic progression, and drug resistance by identifying and tracking the dynamics of somatic mutational heterogeneity. TRACERx also aims to define clonally dominant drivers of disease to address the role of clonal driver dominance in targeted therapeutic response, and to guide lung cancer treatment stratification. The sample collection per patient and overall study schema are summarised in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.
Figure 1

Sample collection in TRACERx.

Figure 2

Schematic of an integrated clinical approach to understanding the impact of intratumour heterogeneity upon disease progression and clinical outcome.

Abbreviations: cfDNA, circulating-free tumour DNA; CTCs, circulating tumour cells; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; IHC, immunohistochemistry. Lungs diagram adapted from “Lungs diagram simple” from Patrick J. Lynch, Wikimedia Commons under CY-BY 2.5. Metastatic disease image from Haubner, et al. (2005) PLoS Med 2: e70. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020070. Images of FACS analysis, immunohistochemistry, and FISH obtained from the Swanton lab.

Schematic of an integrated clinical approach to understanding the impact of intratumour heterogeneity upon disease progression and clinical outcome.

Abbreviations: cfDNA, circulating-free tumour DNA; CTCs, circulating tumour cells; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; IHC, immunohistochemistry. Lungs diagram adapted from “Lungs diagram simple” from Patrick J. Lynch, Wikimedia Commons under CY-BY 2.5. Metastatic disease image from Haubner, et al. (2005) PLoS Med 2: e70. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020070. Images of FACS analysis, immunohistochemistry, and FISH obtained from the Swanton lab.

Spatial Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution in NSCLC

Previous efforts to characterise the cancer genome of NSCLC have involved the analysis of copy number alterations [11],[12], targeted sequencing of candidate cancer genes [13],[14] and next-generation sequencing of genomes and/or exomes [15]–[18]. By interrogating the mutational spectrum of tumours, these studies have demonstrated its complex and heterogeneous genomic landscape from point mutations to large structural variants, and the high mutational burden of smoking-related NSCLC. However, few studies in NSCLC have investigated the clonal and subclonal architecture of lung cancer tumours and their evolution through disease progression. The TRACERx consortium has developed methods to analyse the dynamics of genetic intratumour heterogeneity within individual tumours over time [7]. Distance-based phylogenetic trees will be inferred from the variants, insertions and deletions (INDELS), and structural variations observed in multiregion exome sequence datasets from a single tumour, allowing the discrimination of conserved early genetic mutations present at all sites of the primary tumour from later somatic events present in parts of the tumour and/or metastatic sites. This estimated temporal ordering will give insight into the potential relationships of such changes with ploidy shifts, chromosomal instability, and mutational processes that may change during the course of tumour progression.

Histological Heterogeneity in NSCLC

Lung cancer is a histologically highly heterogeneous disease. Mixed lung tumours containing more than one histological type, such as adenosquamous tumours, combined small-cell tumours (small-cell combined with NSCLC), or tumours with areas of histological dedifferentiation are not uncommon. Within adenocarcinomas, histological variety is the rule, with most tumours showing a mixture of patterns, the commonest being lepidic/in situ, acinar, solid, papillary, and micropapillary. Solid and micropapillary patterns are associated with worse outcome [19]–[21]. Some patterns show associations with known driving mutations [22],[23], although these relationships are incompletely described at present. Furthermore, nuclear grade, which is not currently routinely assessed, often shows heterogeneity and is itself related to outcome [24],[25]. It is not known to what extent this spatial histological heterogeneity reflects genomic heterogeneity as opposed to epigenetic or microenvironmental influences. TRACERx aims to correlate histological heterogeneity with genomic heterogeneity and potentially improve the predictive and prognostic value of histological appearances in NSCLC.

Tumour Heterogeneity, Outcome, and Impact of Platinum Chemotherapy in NSCLC

It is unclear why adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery for primary NSCLC is effective in some patients but not in others. An increasing body of evidence supports the association of patterns of intratumour heterogeneity, in multivariate analyses, with poor survival outcome in NSCLC and other solid tumours [26]. Indeed, work from us and others has shown that chromosomal instability, a driver of intratumour heterogeneity, is associated with cancer drug resistance, and numerous studies have documented the association of chromosomal instability with poor outcome in NSCLC [26]–[31]. The impact of intratumour heterogeneity on evolutionary fitness, together with the documented relationship of heterogeneity with drug resistance, supports the potential predictive nature of this candidate biomarker. Cytotoxic therapies have also been shown to influence the genomic landscape of drug-resistant diseases [32],[33], which raises the concern that increased genomic complexity in cytotoxic refractory tumours may potentiate tumour adaptation. However, studies to date are based on the analysis of small retrospective cohorts such that the true relationship between intratumour heterogeneity and clinical outcome, as well as the impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the tumour genomic landscape, is currently unknown. TRACERx will prospectively assess whether an intratumour heterogeneity index can predict response to adjuvant therapy, and attempt to validate intratumour heterogeneity as an effective prognostic and predictive biomarker independent of known factors, such as tumour stage.

Defining Drivers of Intratumour Heterogeneity and Drug Resistance

Deep sequencing analyses are revealing vast clonal heterogeneity present in solid tumours, including NSCLC, and the spatial and temporal dynamics of cancer subclones that emerge during the disease course and following acquired drug resistance [34],[35]. We have shown that drivers of intratumour heterogeneity can be defined in vivo and that one mechanism driving tumour heterogeneity in colorectal cancer, DNA replication stress, may be targetable [36]. Defining such processes in longitudinal solid tumour cohorts may have therapeutic relevance in attempting to limit tumour heterogeneity, adaptation, and cancer evolution [37]. TRACERx aims to develop an improved understanding of the relationship between phenotypic and genetic intratumour heterogeneity with cancer evolution, and identify further drivers of genomic instability. Ultimately it is hoped that this will support the development of novel therapeutic approaches to limit relapse and improve outcomes in NSCLC.

Impact of Intratumour Heterogeneity on Host Immunity and Tumour Neo-Antigenic Repertoire

Whilst evidence suggests that intratumour heterogeneity may significantly limit the antitumour activity of targeted therapeutics [38], its overall effect on the anticancer immune response may be beneficial, since high levels of intratumoural mutational diversity may generate neo-antigens perceived by the immune system as non-self, thus providing relevant targets for immune-based therapies [38]–[40]. TRACERx aims to provide a resource to define the impact of intratumour heterogeneity on cancer immunity throughout tumour evolution and therapy. Through the integration of clinical and tumour multiregion sequencing data with immunological analysis, the consortium will assess various aspects of tumour immunobiology, including the overall impact of distinct drivers of intratumour heterogeneity on immune infiltration and function, the proportion of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes with the ability to recognise neo-antigens, and whether novel T cell receptors that recognise phosphopeptides preferentially expressed by tumour cells can be identified in patients, with NSCLC serving as a platform for the development of future immunotherapeutic strategies.

Development of Minimally Invasive Methods to Study Tumour Evolution

Primary and metastatic tumours will be genetically profiled to identify clonal and subclonal driver mutations. However, our analysis of the primary tumour is limited to tissue surplus to diagnostic requirement, albeit multiregional, and our analysis of metastatic sites is likely to be restricted to one location, emphasising the need to develop less invasive approaches to follow tumour evolution. Circulating biomarkers have the potential to monitor minimal residual disease, forecast early progression, and document subclonal evolution through therapy and acquired drug resistance [41]. Here we propose to extend the TRACERx consortium's expertise in minimally invasive biomarker approaches to monitor tumour subclonal evolution through serial analysis of circulating-free tumour DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs) before surgery and throughout the disease course. We have shown that cfDNA analysis is technically straightforward with limited cost and has demonstrable utility in disease monitoring [35],[42], and that CTC number in NSCLC is an independent prognostic biomarker [43]. TRACERx aims to address how intratumour heterogeneity is manifested in circulating biomarkers and the extent to which the genetic landscape of the primary and metastatic tumour is reflected in CTCs and cfDNA. This comparison will take into account the limitations in tumour sampling and therefore the potential to identify genetic aberrations in CTCs and cfDNA not detected in the tumour tissue. By comparing serial samples, TRACERx will determine whether cfDNA can detect residual disease following surgery and predict tumour recurrence, whether CTCs and cfDNA in advanced metastatic disease can represent further selection of subclones over time, and whether CTCs and cfDNA can provide insight into drug resistance mechanisms.

Clonal Dominance and Clinical Outcome

There is a pressing need to define early driver events suitable for clinical drug trial stratification and to assess prospectively the role of drug target intratumour heterogeneity in the early emergence of resistance and poor DFS outcomes. Until recently, the term “actionable mutation” was used to define the presence of a somatic mutation or copy number event in a single tumour biopsy that might suggest a targeted therapeutic approach. However, emerging evidence for intratumour heterogeneity in breast cancer [44], renal cell carcinoma [7], glioblastoma [45], pancreatic cancer [6],[46], and medulloblastoma [47] demands the consideration of the role of clonal dominance when defining actionable events. In patients with an identified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation treated with EGFR-targeted therapy, the clonality of the mutation is generally unknown, and yet it has been suggested that subclonal EGFR somatic mutational heterogeneity may be an understudied mechanism of drug resistance [48]. Similarly, identifying high-risk subclonal drivers that might contribute to metastatic progression and be suitable for therapeutic intervention is also an area of unmet need. Through the deep-sequencing of paired primary and relapsed-disease samples, TRACERx will distinguish clonal from subclonal drivers and will relate the clonal dominance of targetable events to progression-free survival (PFS) intervals for targeted therapies in the advanced disease setting within the DARWIN (Deciphering Anti-tumour Response With INtratumour Heterogeneity) Clinical Trial Programme that is currently in development. The consortium will attempt to define a new process for drug development, stratifying PFS outcomes based on clonal dominance of the targetable event, and map the tumour's subclonal dynamics during the acquisition of drug resistance.

Metastatic Disease and Defining the Origins of the Lethal Subclone

Clonal diversity between primary and metastatic tumours in the same patient has been demonstrated in different tumour types, including but not limited to, breast [49], pancreatic [6],[46], prostate [9], and medulloblastoma [47]. Longitudinal sample collection and genomic analysis from the primary tumour through disease progression and at the time of death has the potential to identify the molecular features and subclonal origin of the metastatic process. In an interesting case of prostate cancer, Haffner and colleagues correlated whole-genome sequencing data from a primary tumour with three sites of metastases collected at autopsy 17 years after presentation [9]. Despite genetic heterogeneity among metastases, there were many shared events suggesting a monoclonal origin. Through histological assessment, alongside sequencing, they identified the lethal metastatic clone originating from the primary tumour. Patients who develop terminal metastatic NSCLC in TRACERx will be asked to consider enrolling in an autopsy programme that will be open nationally. For each patient, TRACERx will have accumulated an unprecedented amount of genetic data, and accessing tissue from multiple sites of disease after death would give some insight into the evolving constellation of genetic aberrations and a potential model for the metastatic process. Circulating biomarkers collected at this point may add to this model, although as previously mentioned, the extent to which these biomarkers reflect tumour genomics in NSCLC is yet to be fully determined.

Conclusions

The importance of intratumour heterogeneity is increasingly recognised as a driver of tumour progression, drug resistance and treatment failure in solid tumours [5],[6],[27],[44],[47],[50]–[52]. The presence of subclonal driver events may prove a significant challenge to biomarker development and drug target discovery efforts, and contribute to drug resistance and poor survival outcome [10],[44],[53],[54]. Despite the impressive developments of international large-scale sequencing consortia, the spatial separation of tumour subclones, the changing nature of the disease over time, and the impact of such diversity upon outcome are yet to be addressed [3]. Lung TRACERx is a large-scale study integrating complex genomic data with phenotypic clinical annotation and outcome in order to decipher the heterogeneity of the cancer genome and mutational pathways involved in NSCLC pathogenesis. It aims to develop clinically meaningful measures of intratumour heterogeneity to guide patient management and treatment stratification [55] and to prospectively define thresholds of tumour heterogeneity for clinical risk stratification. With increasing awareness of the need to obtain tissue and genetically profile cancers in order to stratify treatment, the concept of longitudinal tissue collection and analysis has become more acceptable in oncological practice. In following cancers from diagnosis to relapse, tracking the evolutionary trajectories of tumours in relation to therapeutic interventions, and determining the impact of clonal heterogeneity on clinical outcomes, TRACERx may also serve as a model applicable to other cancer types. TRACERx is not without its limitations. In determining the full extent of intratumour heterogeneity, we are reliant on tissue collected surplus to diagnostic requirements, and therefore entire tumours are not sequenced. However, with deep sequencing and multiregion sampling, together with retrospective genomics analysis of residual surplus tumour tissue guided by the metastatic sample datasets, we hope to achieve significant coverage of the relevant tumour genomic landscape within each patient. Analysing circulating biomarkers, such as cfDNA and CTCs, may further complement the tumour sequencing data and identify additional genetic aberrations not detected by primary or metastatic tumour sequencing. We anticipate that a biopsy of a metastatic site may not be appropriate in all patients, but having taken into account expected rates of attrition, we will have a sufficient number of cases to meet the study outcome objectives. Finally, our ability to detect subclonal somatic events occurring at low variant allele frequencies is limited by the power of our existing methods, but as sequencing and bioinformatics methods advance, TRACERx will adapt to incorporate such improvements in technologies, including the use of deep whole-genome sequencing datasets in some cases with no clear genetic driver events. Overall, TRACERx aims to develop an understanding of the genomic landscape of NSCLC through the disease course and the biological role of underlying genetic events that might contribute to disease progression. Optimising understanding of NSCLC evolutionary processes may help to identify novel therapeutic targets to improve clinical outcomes. As the cost of sequencing decreases and informatics techniques advance, such large-scale longitudinal genomic studies may become a central component to the delivery of precision cancer medicine.
  55 in total

1.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Campbell; Shinichi Yachida; Laura J Mudie; Philip J Stephens; Erin D Pleasance; Lucy A Stebbings; Laura A Morsberger; Calli Latimer; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena A Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Constance A Griffin; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Michael A Quail; Michael R Stratton; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A comprehensive survey of clonal diversity measures in Barrett's esophagus as biomarkers of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lauren M F Merlo; Najaf A Shah; Xiaohong Li; Patricia L Blount; Thomas L Vaughan; Brian J Reid; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-10-12

3.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Alexander Krasnitz; Linda Rodgers; Kerry Cook; Jennifer Meth; Jude Kendall; Michael Riggs; Yvonne Eberling; Jennifer Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Dan Levy; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in smokers and never-smokers.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Govindan; Li Ding; Malachi Griffith; Janakiraman Subramanian; Nathan D Dees; Krishna L Kanchi; Christopher A Maher; Robert Fulton; Lucinda Fulton; John Wallis; Ken Chen; Jason Walker; Sandra McDonald; Ron Bose; David Ornitz; Donghai Xiong; Ming You; David J Dooling; Mark Watson; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Lineage-specific dependency of lung adenocarcinomas on the lung development regulator TTF-1.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tanaka; Kiyoshi Yanagisawa; Keiko Shinjo; Ayumu Taguchi; Ken Maeno; Shuta Tomida; Yukako Shimada; Hirotaka Osada; Takayuki Kosaka; Hideo Matsubara; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Yoshitaka Sekido; Mitsune Tanimoto; Yasushi Yatabe; Takashi Takahashi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Epitope landscape in breast and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Neil H Segal; D Williams Parsons; Karl S Peggs; Victor Velculescu; Ken W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; James P Allison
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time.

Authors:  Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia.

Authors:  Kristina Anderson; Christoph Lutz; Frederik W van Delft; Caroline M Bateman; Yanping Guo; Susan M Colman; Helena Kempski; Anthony V Moorman; Ian Titley; John Swansbury; Lyndal Kearney; Tariq Enver; Mel Greaves
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Breast cancer genome heterogeneity: a challenge to personalised medicine?

Authors:  Charles Swanton; Rebecca A Burrell; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Nicholas McGranahan; Jiri Bartek; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  72 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal cancer: Tracking tumour evolution through liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Samra Turajlic; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Predicting lung cancer recurrence from circulating tumour DNA. Commentary on 'Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution'.

Authors:  Daniel J Murphy; Kevin G Blyth
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Exploiting Synthetic Lethality and Network Biology to Overcome EGFR Inhibitor Resistance in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Simon Vyse; Annie Howitt; Paul H Huang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Natural Selection in Cancer Biology: From Molecular Snowflakes to Trait Hallmarks.

Authors:  Angelo Fortunato; Amy Boddy; Diego Mallo; Athena Aktipis; Carlo C Maley; John W Pepper
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Unstable Genome and Transcriptome Dynamics during Tumor Metastasis Contribute to Therapeutic Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Sung-Yup Cho; Jeesoo Chae; Deukchae Na; Wonyoung Kang; Ahra Lee; Seoyeon Min; Jinjoo Kang; Boram Choi; Jieun Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Jeffrey H Chuang; Charles Lee; Won-Suk Lee; Hansoo Park; Jong-Il Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Detection of Solid Tumor Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Using Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Authors:  Re-I Chin; Kevin Chen; Abul Usmani; Chanelle Chua; Peter K Harris; Michael S Binkley; Tej D Azad; Jonathan C Dudley; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 7.  [Molecular diagnostics of non-small cell lung cancer: New markers and technologies].

Authors:  A Warth; V Endris; M Kriegsmann; A Stenzinger; R Penzel; N Pfarr; W Weichert
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Challenges and unanswered questions for the next decade of circulating tumour cell research in lung cancer.

Authors:  Sumitra Mohan; Francesca Chemi; Ged Brady
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Circulating Tumor Cells, DNA, and mRNA: Potential for Clinical Utility in Patients With Melanoma.

Authors:  Melody J Xu; Jay F Dorsey; Ravi Amaravadi; Giorgos Karakousis; Charles B Simone; Xiaowei Xu; Wei Xu; Erica L Carpenter; Lynn Schuchter; Gary D Kao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 10.  Treatment Algorithms Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling: The Essence of Precision Medicine Trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Maud Kamal; Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Philippe Bedard; Gaëlle Pierron; Céline Callens; Etienne Rouleau; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Nicolas Servant; Marie Alt; Roman Rouzier; Xavier Paoletti; Olivier Delattre; Ivan Bièche
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.