Literature DB >> 19903760

Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Nicholas Navin1, Alexander Krasnitz, Linda Rodgers, Kerry Cook, Jennifer Meth, Jude Kendall, Michael Riggs, Yvonne Eberling, Jennifer Troge, Vladimir Grubor, Dan Levy, Pär Lundin, Susanne Månér, Anders Zetterberg, James Hicks, Michael Wigler.   

Abstract

Cancer progression in humans is difficult to infer because we do not routinely sample patients at multiple stages of their disease. However, heterogeneous breast tumors provide a unique opportunity to study human tumor progression because they still contain evidence of early and intermediate subpopulations in the form of the phylogenetic relationships. We have developed a method we call Sector-Ploidy-Profiling (SPP) to study the clonal composition of breast tumors. SPP involves macro-dissecting tumors, flow-sorting genomic subpopulations by DNA content, and profiling genomes using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Breast carcinomas display two classes of genomic structural variation: (1) monogenomic and (2) polygenomic. Monogenomic tumors appear to contain a single major clonal subpopulation with a highly stable chromosome structure. Polygenomic tumors contain multiple clonal tumor subpopulations, which may occupy the same sectors, or separate anatomic locations. In polygenomic tumors, we show that heterogeneity can be ascribed to a few clonal subpopulations, rather than a series of gradual intermediates. By comparing multiple subpopulations from different anatomic locations, we have inferred pathways of cancer progression and the organization of tumor growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903760      PMCID: PMC2798832          DOI: 10.1101/gr.099622.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  46 in total

Review 1.  The history of cancer epigenetics.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Benjamin Tycko
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  PROBER: oligonucleotide FISH probe design software.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Vladimir Grubor; Jim Hicks; Evan Leibu; Elizabeth Thomas; Jennifer Troge; Michael Riggs; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Jonathan Sebat; Anders Zetterberg; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Wild-type NRas and KRas perform distinct functions during transformation.

Authors:  Poppy P Fotiadou; Chiaki Takahashi; Hasan N Rajabi; Mark E Ewen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Approaching solid tumor heterogeneity on a cellular basis by tissue proteomics using laser capture microdissection and biological mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Donald J Johann; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Sumana Mukherjee; DaRue A Prieto; Jeffrey C Hanson; Michael Emmert-Buck; Josip Blonder
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation.

Authors:  Felix Mitelman; Bertil Johansson; Fredrik Mertens
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  The cancer genome.

Authors:  Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Karyotypic comparisons of multiple tumorous and macroscopically normal surrounding tissue samples from patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  M R Teixeira; N Pandis; G Bardi; J A Andersen; S Heim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Sari Laitinen; Sofia Khan; Mauno Vihinen; Jeanne Kowalski; Guoqiang Yu; Li Chen; Charles M Ewing; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Yue Wang; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Tapio Visakorpi; G Steven Bova
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Interphase cytogenetics reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and intra-tumour heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Fiegl; C Tueni; T Schenk; R Jakesz; M Gnant; A Reiner; M Rudas; H Pirc-Danoewinata; C Marosi; H Huber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  225 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  Clinical implementation of comprehensive strategies to characterize cancer genomes: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Laura E MacConaill; Paul Van Hummelen; Matthew Meyerson; William C Hahn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 4.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Genetic and non-genetic clonal diversity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  James R M Black; Nicholas McGranahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Accurate reconstruction of the temporal order of mutations in neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Sprouffske; John W Pepper; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-04-13

7.  Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2.

Authors:  Simone Picelli; Omid R Faridani; Asa K Björklund; Gösta Winberg; Sven Sagasser; Rickard Sandberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Tumor evolution in response to chemotherapy: phenotype versus genotype.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Center of cancer systems biology second annual workshop--tumor metronomics: timing and dose level dynamics.

Authors:  Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Giannoula Lakka Klement
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Carol Farhangfar; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.