A glutathione S-transferase (GST) catalyzed macrocyclization reaction for peptides up to 40 amino acids in length is reported. GST catalyzes the selective S(N)Ar reaction between an N-terminal glutathione (GSH, γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) tag and a C-terminal perfluoroaryl-modified cysteine on the same polypeptide chain. Cyclic peptides ranging from 9 to 24 residues were quantitatively produced within 2 h in aqueous pH = 8 buffer at room temperature. The reaction was highly selective for cyclization at the GSH tag, enabling the combination of GST-catalyzed ligation with native chemical ligation to generate a large 40-residue peptide macrocycle.
A glutathione S-transferase (GST) catalyzed macrocyclization reaction for peptides up to 40 amino acids in length is reported. GST catalyzes the selective S(N)Ar reaction between an N-terminal glutathione (GSH, γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) tag and a C-terminal perfluoroaryl-modified cysteine on the same polypeptide chain. Cyclic peptides ranging from 9 to 24 residues were quantitatively produced within 2 h in aqueous pH = 8 buffer at room temperature. The reaction was highly selective for cyclization at the GSH tag, enabling the combination of GST-catalyzed ligation with native chemical ligation to generate a large 40-residue peptide macrocycle.
Both natural and hybrid cyclic
peptides represent an important class of molecules being actively
explored as potential therapeutics.[1] These
species are attractive because of their enhanced binding affinity,
exo- and endopeptidase resistance, and in certain cases increased
cell penetration compared to their linear counterparts. Chemical macrocyclization
methods have been developed to cross-link two functional groups within
a linear peptide substrate through head-to-tail, head-to-side chain,
tail-to-side chain, or side chain-to-side chain.[2] Cross-linking methods include amide bond or ester bond
formation,[3] thiol-based substitution with
alkyl and benzyl halide electrophiles (commonly referred to as “alkylation”),[4] oxidation at cysteine or selenocysteine residues
to form a dichalcogenide bond,[1a,5] native chemical ligation,[6] intein-mediated approaches,[7] Staudinger ligation,[8] transition-metal-catalyzed
coupling reactions,[9] cycloadditions,[10] coordination-based approaches,[11] as well as several noncovalent strategies.[12]Enzyme-catalyzed peptide macrocyclizations remain
rare.[13] Subtiligase was used to catalyze
amide-bond
formation between an N-terminal amine and a C-terminal ester to generate a 31-residue cyclic peptide
with 85% yield.[14] Thioesterase was successfully
employed to cyclize linear peptides generated from the nonribosomal
peptide synthetase system.[15] Sortase was
used to catalyze the cyclization of peptides, glycopeptides, and proteins.[16] With the sortase-catalyzed peptide cyclization
method,[16a] a 67% yield of cyclic peptide
product was produced and the linear oligomer was the major side product.We recently reported a facile cysteine SNAr arylation
chemistry using highly activated and electrophilic perfluoroaromatic
reagents.[17] In particular, two cysteine
residues on an unprotected polypeptide were cross-linked with bifunctional
perfluoroaromatic reagents. This macrocyclization strategy was versatile
enabling the cross-linking of two cysteine moieties positioned at
all sites ranging from i, i+1 to i, i+14 on a 14-residue unprotected peptide.[17b] For longer peptides, however, we found that entropic penalty becomes
large enough to render macrocyclizations inefficient. This fundamental
limitation is therefore expected to be encountered with any long and
unstructured polypeptide irrespective of the cyclization chemistry
used. To address the challenge associated with macrocyclization of
long polypeptides, we now report a strategy where the glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme[18] is
used to catalyze the SNAr reaction between cysteine and
perfluoroaromatic moieties in aqueous buffer leading to large hybrid
peptide macrocycles. This transformation overcomes the major length
restrictions previously encountered in noncatalyzed SNAr
macrocyclization reactions.We have recently shown that GST
can catalyze the conjugation of
perfluoroaryl-linked biomolecules or chemical probes to polypeptides
and proteins containing an N-terminal γ-Glu-Cys-Gly
(GSH) tag.[19] This enzymatic “click”
ligation reaction enables selective modification of the cysteine in
the GSH tag in the presence of other cysteines and reactive functional
groups on the same polypeptide chain. Importantly, we found that GST
can catalyze the cyclization of a seven-residue peptide between an N-terminal GSH tag and a C-terminal perfluoroaryl
moiety; intramolecular cyclization process occurred within seconds
producing cyclic peptide in quantitative yield. This result suggests
that one could in principle develop a general protocol for GST-catalyzed
peptide macrocyclization for potentially larger ring sizes (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-catalyzed
macrocyclization.
The macrocyclic peptide is generated by GST-catalyzed SNAr reaction between the cysteine thiol of an N-terminal
glutathione (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) tag and a perfluoroaryl moiety linked
to the C-terminal cysteine. Circles represent amino
acids.
Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-catalyzed
macrocyclization.
The macrocyclic peptide is generated by GST-catalyzed SNAr reaction between the cysteine thiol of an N-terminal
glutathione (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) tag and a perfluoroaryl moiety linked
to the C-terminal cysteine. Circles represent amino
acids.The linear substrates employed
in our studies were readily prepared
in two steps (Figure 2). Peptides with an N-terminal disulfide protected GSH tag and a C-terminal free cysteine were synthesized by rapid flow-based Fmoc-SPPS
followed by C-terminal cysteine S-arylation with perfluoroaromatic reagents using the previously reported
protocol (see the Supporting Information). The linear substrates were purified by RP-HPLC and then subjected
to macrocyclization. Tris(carboxylethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP·HCl)
was added to the reaction buffer in situ to deprotect the disulfide
bond and generate a free cysteine in the GSH tag for GST-catalyzed
macrocyclization.
Figure 2
Synthesis of perfluoroaryl-linked
peptides for GST-catalyzed macrocyclization.
Circles represent amino acids. PG: protecting group; SPPS: solid-phase
peptide synthesis.
We commenced our study by searching for the
best perfluoroaromatic
linker for the GST-catalyzed cyclization reaction (Figure 3). We prepared model peptides 1a–c with C-terminal cysteines S-arylated with decafluorobiphenyl, hexafluorobenzene, and pentafluorophenyl
sulfide, respectively (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Upon incubation of a 0.1 mM solution of peptide 1a (Figure 3B, top chromatogram) in the presence
of 10 mol % of GST (0.2 mg/mL) in pH 8.0 phosphate buffer with 20
mM TCEP·HCl, cyclic product Cyc-1a was produced
in quantitative yield within 5 min at room temperature as shown by
LC–MS analysis of the crude reaction mixture. We did not observe
oligomeric side products (Figure 3B, bottom
chromatogram). Importantly, the control reaction without added enzyme
contained mostly unreacted linear peptide 1a′
with only a trace amount of cyclized product (Figure 3B, middle chromatogram). Compared with peptide 1a, peptides 1b and 1c showed significantly
lower enzyme mediated cyclization yields under the same reaction conditions
(Figure 3A). At extended reaction times, only
45% and 57% of cyclized products were observed for peptide 1b and 1c respectively (Figures S4 and S5, Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Macrocyclization
of peptides with different perfluoroaromatic linkers.
Reaction conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 1a–c, 0.2 mg/mL GST, 20 mM tris(carboxylethyl)phosphine hydrochloride
(TCEP·HCl), 0.1 M phosphate, pH 8.0, room temperature (25 °C),
5 min. (A) Reaction yields with different linkers with or without
the addition of GST. (B) LC–MS analysis of crude reaction mixtures
with peptide 1a. Amino acids are shown in one-letter
codes. γ-E: γ-glutamic acid. LC–MS data shown are
total ion currents (TIC); mass spectra at the highest points of the
TIC peaks are shown as insets.
Synthesis of perfluoroaryl-linked
peptides for GST-catalyzed macrocyclization.
Circles represent amino acids. PG: protecting group; SPPS: solid-phase
peptide synthesis.The highest cyclization
rate under GST catalysis was achieved with
peptide 1a as determined by LC–MS time course
studies (Figures S3 and S9, Supporting Information). The cyclization rate of peptide 1a under enzyme-catalysis
was ∼900-fold faster than without enzyme (Figure S10, Supporting Information). This high cyclization
efficiency under enzyme catalysis permitted macrocyclization at increased
concentrations of linear peptide: unlike other enzyme-catalyzed macrocyclization
methods where increasing the concentrations of linear substrates can
lead to the formation of oligomeric side products via competing intermolecular
reaction pathways.[16a] We found that increasing
the concentration of peptide 1a to 10 mM with only 0.1
mol % of GST still produced the cyclized product quantitatively within
3 h (Figure S11, Supporting Information); no oligomeric byproducts were observed. The unique preference
and high efficiency of peptide 1a for GST-catalyzed cyclization
indicates the perfluorobiphenyl moiety is highly suited for this chemistry.Macrocyclization
of peptides with different perfluoroaromatic linkers.
Reaction conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 1a–c, 0.2 mg/mL GST, 20 mM tris(carboxylethyl)phosphine hydrochloride
(TCEP·HCl), 0.1 M phosphate, pH 8.0, room temperature (25 °C),
5 min. (A) Reaction yields with different linkers with or without
the addition of GST. (B) LC–MS analysis of crude reaction mixtures
with peptide 1a. Amino acids are shown in one-letter
codes. γ-E: γ-glutamic acid. LC–MS data shown are
total ion currents (TIC); mass spectra at the highest points of the
TIC peaks are shown as insets.Macrocyclization of peptides with increasing lengths. Reaction
conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 2a–4a,
0.2 mg/mL GST, 20 mM TCEP·HCl, 0.1 M phosphate, pH 8.0, room
temperature (25 °C), 2 h. (A) Reaction yields of cyclization
reactions with and without the addition of GST (C(S-tBu): tert-butylthio-protected cysteine; C*: perfluoroaryl-modified
cysteine). The two cysteines that were cross-linked together are highlighted
in red. (B) LC–MS analysis of reactions of peptide 2a to 4a with the addition of GST. LC–MS data shown
are total ion currents (TIC); mass spectra at the highest points of
the TIC peaks are shown as insets.To probe macrocyclization of peptides with increasing lengths,
we prepared peptides 2a–4a with variable
numbers (2–4) of repeating GLKAG pentapeptide sequences positioned
between the GSH tag and the perfluoroaryl-linked C-terminal cysteine
(Figure S2, Supporting Information). Although
decreased cyclization rates were observed as the peptide lengths increased
(Figure S10, Supporting Information), cyclization
of these three peptides under reaction conditions similar to those
described in Figure 3 yielded cyclized products Cyc-2a–Cyc-4a nearly quantitatively within
2 h (Figure 4). Only 5% of cyclic products
were observed for reactions without GST present (Figure 4A and Figures S6–S8, Supporting
Information).
Figure 4
Macrocyclization of peptides with increasing lengths. Reaction
conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 2a–4a,
0.2 mg/mL GST, 20 mM TCEP·HCl, 0.1 M phosphate, pH 8.0, room
temperature (25 °C), 2 h. (A) Reaction yields of cyclization
reactions with and without the addition of GST (C(S-tBu): tert-butylthio-protected cysteine; C*: perfluoroaryl-modified
cysteine). The two cysteines that were cross-linked together are highlighted
in red. (B) LC–MS analysis of reactions of peptide 2a to 4a with the addition of GST. LC–MS data shown
are total ion currents (TIC); mass spectra at the highest points of
the TIC peaks are shown as insets.
To compare the GST-catalyzed macrocyclization
in water with the
uncatalyzed macrocyclization in organic solvent side-by-side, we prepared
and purified peptides 2a′–4a′ by reducing the disulfide moiety in peptides 2a–4a and purified them by RP-HPLC (Figure S12, Supporting Information). Adding DMF with Tris
base to peptides 2a′–4a′
initiated their intramolecular cyclization reaction and produced cyclized
products Cyc-2a–Cyc-4a. The highest
reaction yield was observed for the shortest peptide 2a′ with 39% of cyclized product generated within 2 h as measured
by LC–MS analysis of the crude reaction mixture (Figure S12B, Supporting Information). Significant amounts
of oligo- and polymeric side products were observed for the macrocyclizations
of longer peptides 3a′ and 4a′;
desired cyclic products were minor products identified in the LC–MS
chromatograms (Figure S12, Supporting Information).To further compare the GST-catalyzed cyclization with our
previously
reported cross-linking chemistry,[17b] we
synthesized peptides 2b–4b with free
cysteines at both the GSH tag and the C-terminus.
Peptides 2b–4b could be cyclized
by the reaction with decafluorobiphenyl to produce Cyc-2a–Cyc-4a. Similar to peptide 2a′–4a′, we observed decreased cyclization yields as the
peptide lengths increased. 37% of desired product was formed with
the shortest peptide 2b, but no detectable cyclic product
resulted with longer peptides 3b and 4b (Figure
S14 and S13, Supporting Information). We
previously found reducing the concentration of linear substrate could
improve the reaction yield of the cyclization reaction for small model
peptides in DMF; however, cyclization of 3b and 4b at diluted conditions still resulted in mixtures of byproducts
(Figure S13F,I, Supporting Information).In contrast to the GST-catalyzed cyclization where increasing the
peptide length had no effects on the cyclization yield, all cyclization
reactions in DMF showed significantly diminished yields as the peptide
lengths increased (Figure S14, Supporting Information). The significantly lowered reaction efficiencies and yields for
macrocyclization in DMF compared to macrocyclization under GST catalysis
in water highlight the effectiveness of the GST-catalyzed macrocyclization
process which compensates the entropic penalty derived from the increased
size of the peptide substrate.Our previous studies have shown
that the GST-catalyzed perfluoroarylation
reaction was highly selective toward the cysteine residue within the
GSH moiety.[19] The desired GSH S-arylated product could be selectively and quantitatively formed
in the presence of another cysteine in the same polypeptide chain.
We reasoned this highly selective nature of the GST-catalyzed reaction
could permit the combination of GST-catalyzed ligation with native
chemical ligation (NCL) to generate large cyclic peptides from linear
substrate synthesized by NCL reaction (Figure 5). GST selectively recognizes the GSH tag and only catalyzes the
arylation reaction at the GSH thiol in the presence of the free cysteine
generated from NCL reaction, thus allowing NCL product to be cyclized
by GST-catalyzed ligation (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Macrocyclization of a
40-residue peptide 7 prepared
from native chemical ligation. Reaction conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 7, 0.2 mg/mL GST, 0.2 M phosphate, 20 mM TCEP·HCl, pH
8.0, room temperature, 2 h. LC–MS data shown are total ion
currents of starting material (top chromatogram) and crude reaction
mixture (bottom chromatogram); mass spectra at the highest points
of the TIC peaks are shown as insets.
We synthesized and purified a large 40-residue linear peptide 7 obtained from the hydrazide-based NCL reaction[21] (Figure S15, Supporting
Information). Cyclization of peptide 7 under GST
catalysis produced desired cyclized product Cyc-7 with
70% yield as measured by LC–MS analysis of the crude reaction
mixture. Trypsin digestion and MS/MS analysis confirmed that the cysteine
at the NCL ligation site remained unmodifed after the GST-catalyzed
cyclization reaction (Figure S18, Supporting Information). Reaction without enzyme showed only a trace amount of product
formation and no regioselectivity (Figure S17, Supporting Information). In addition, we further showed that
the native chemical ligation and GST-catalyzed ligation could be done
in one pot with the desired macrocyclic peptide as the major product
(Figure S16, Supporting Information). In
most cases, the macrocyclic product ring size is restricted to lengths
of peptides that can be accessed from SPPS and the efficiency of the
cyclization reactions. In our method, combining GST-catalyzed ligation
and native chemical ligation offers a method to overcome these challenges
for the synthesis of large macrocyclic peptides.Macrocyclization of a
40-residue peptide 7 prepared
from native chemical ligation. Reaction conditions: 0.1 mM peptide 7, 0.2 mg/mL GST, 0.2 M phosphate, 20 mM TCEP·HCl, pH
8.0, room temperature, 2 h. LC–MS data shown are total ion
currents of starting material (top chromatogram) and crude reaction
mixture (bottom chromatogram); mass spectra at the highest points
of the TIC peaks are shown as insets.We have shown how glutathione S-transferase
(GST)
can efficiently mediate the macrocyclization reaction of long peptides
by catalyzing a SNAr process between cysteine and perfluoroaromatic
moieties. This transformation operates under mild aqueous conditions,
at ambient temperature, and takes only a few hours to complete. The
reaction was shown to be highly efficient and selective, especially
for the generation of macrocyclic peptides with large ring sizes.
To demonstrate the unique selectivity of our GST-catalyzed reaction,
a 40-residue macrocyclic peptide was prepared by combining GST-catalyzed
ligation with native chemical ligation.
Authors: Hyunil Jo; Nataline Meinhardt; Yibing Wu; Swapnil Kulkarni; Xiaozhen Hu; Kristin E Low; Peter L Davies; William F DeGrado; Doron C Greenbaum Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Chi Zhang; Ekaterina V Vinogradova; Alexander M Spokoyny; Stephen L Buchwald; Bradley L Pentelute Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Chi Zhang; Matthew Welborn; Tianyu Zhu; Nicole J Yang; Michael S Santos; Troy Van Voorhis; Bradley L Pentelute Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Saba Alapour; Anamika Sharma; Beatriz G de la Torre; Deresh Ramjugernath; Neil A Koorbanally; Fernando Albericio Journal: Front Chem Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 5.221