PURPOSE: A comprehensive understanding of the role of modifiable health behaviors in effective management of cancer-related fatigue is needed. Among breast cancer survivors, we examined how postdiagnosis diet quality, independently and jointly with physical activity, is related to fatigue, and the potential mediating role of inflammation. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study completed food frequency and physical activity questionnaires 30 months postdiagnosis. We scored diet quality using the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010). Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in fasting 30-ml blood samples. Multidimensional fatigue was measured 41 months postdiagnosis using the 22-item revised Piper Fatigue Scale. In multivariate linear models, we determined whether fatigue was associated HEI-2010 quartiles (Q1-Q4), and a variable jointly reflecting HEI quartiles and physical activity levels. RESULTS: Survivors with better-quality diets (Q4 vs. Q1) had lower total fatigue (4.1 vs. 4.8, p-contrast = 0.003) and subscale scores (behavioral severity 3.4 vs. 4.2, p-contrast = 0.003; affective meaning 3.9 vs. 4.8, p-contrast = 0.007; sensory 4.4 vs. 5.2, p-contrast = 0.003; cognitive 4.6 vs. 5.0, p-contrast = 0.046). Least squares estimates of fatigue were similar in models including CRP. Compared to survivors with poor-quality diets and no physical activity, survivors with better-quality diets and meeting physical activity recommendations had significantly lower behavioral severity (3.2 vs. 4.7, p-contrast = 0.002) and sensory (3.8 vs. 4.8. p-contrast = 0.006) fatigue scores. CONCLUSION: In this large breast cancer survivor cohort, postdiagnosis diet quality was inversely and independently associated with fatigue. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Future interventions designed to improve multiple energy balance behaviors can provide insight into their associations with fatigue.
PURPOSE: A comprehensive understanding of the role of modifiable health behaviors in effective management of cancer-related fatigue is needed. Among breast cancer survivors, we examined how postdiagnosis diet quality, independently and jointly with physical activity, is related to fatigue, and the potential mediating role of inflammation. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study completed food frequency and physical activity questionnaires 30 months postdiagnosis. We scored diet quality using the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010). Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in fasting 30-ml blood samples. Multidimensional fatigue was measured 41 months postdiagnosis using the 22-item revised Piper Fatigue Scale. In multivariate linear models, we determined whether fatigue was associated HEI-2010 quartiles (Q1-Q4), and a variable jointly reflecting HEI quartiles and physical activity levels. RESULTS: Survivors with better-quality diets (Q4 vs. Q1) had lower total fatigue (4.1 vs. 4.8, p-contrast = 0.003) and subscale scores (behavioral severity 3.4 vs. 4.2, p-contrast = 0.003; affective meaning 3.9 vs. 4.8, p-contrast = 0.007; sensory 4.4 vs. 5.2, p-contrast = 0.003; cognitive 4.6 vs. 5.0, p-contrast = 0.046). Least squares estimates of fatigue were similar in models including CRP. Compared to survivors with poor-quality diets and no physical activity, survivors with better-quality diets and meeting physical activity recommendations had significantly lower behavioral severity (3.2 vs. 4.7, p-contrast = 0.002) and sensory (3.8 vs. 4.8. p-contrast = 0.006) fatigue scores. CONCLUSION: In this large breast cancer survivor cohort, postdiagnosis diet quality was inversely and independently associated with fatigue. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Future interventions designed to improve multiple energy balance behaviors can provide insight into their associations with fatigue.
Authors: Patricia M Guenther; Kellie O Casavale; Jill Reedy; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Hazel A B Hiza; Kevin J Kuczynski; Lisa L Kahle; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: G A Curt; W Breitbart; D Cella; J E Groopman; S J Horning; L M Itri; D H Johnson; C Miaskowski; S L Scherr; R K Portenoy; N J Vogelzang Journal: Oncologist Date: 2000
Authors: Anne McTiernan; Kumar B Rajan; Shelley S Tworoger; Melinda Irwin; Leslie Bernstein; Richard Baumgartner; Frank Gilliland; Frank Z Stanczyk; Yutaka Yasui; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fang Fang Zhang; Rohit P Ojha; Kevin R Krull; Todd M Gibson; Lu Lu; Jennifer Lanctot; Wassim Chemaitilly; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Nicholas J Marchello; Heather D Gibbs; Debra K Sullivan; Mathew K Taylor; Jill M Hamilton-Reeves; Alvin F Beltramo; Christie A Befort Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Suzanna Maria Zick; Justin Colacino; Maria Cornellier; Tohfa Khabir; Katie Surnow; Zora Djuric Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Velda J Gonzalez-Mercado; Sara Marrero; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Maribel Tirado-Gómez; Miguel A Marrero-Falcón; Elsa Pedro; Leorey N Saligan Journal: P R Health Sci J Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 0.600